Till recently this blogger too used to think that Nuclear energy is relatively safe and efficient. With carbon emis
sion preoccupying our mind the dangers of radioactive radiation and the safety concerns of Nuclear power plant were undermined. Until Fukushima happened. Clearly the radioactive risk is significant. And unlike Chernobyl that was an accident caused by negligence Fukushima’s cause is natural that makes nuclear power plants extremely vulnerable. Despite what nuclear scientists may profess (it is difficult to be neutral here since it is an industry now with competing forces that may not like the truth) the fact is that there isn’t any technology that can neutralise radioactivity. Germany’s decision to shut down its Nuclear Power plants (by 2022) is quite significant since nuclear energy contributes to about quarter of its energy needs. This a lesson for those who seek to see nuclear energy as energy of future. Clearly any source of energy has to be sustainable in the long run, and radioactivity is as much damaging (if not more) as increasing carbon footprint. Angela Merkel said it is a "transformation towards efficient and renewable energies, with all the opportunities that it has, for exports, development, new technologies and jobs”
It is astounding that sustainable source of energy is not given as much importance as was needed till recently, i guess with the world reaching the tipping point (or have we already crossed it) the addiction with hydrocarbons will have to give way to renewable sources. Sun seems to be the answer, not only taping and storing sunlight but the fusion reaction. When i was studying in school there was lots of excitement about nuclear fusion (“to light the whole city with a glass of water”) and superconductivity. Wonder what happened to these?
sion preoccupying our mind the dangers of radioactive radiation and the safety concerns of Nuclear power plant were undermined. Until Fukushima happened. Clearly the radioactive risk is significant. And unlike Chernobyl that was an accident caused by negligence Fukushima’s cause is natural that makes nuclear power plants extremely vulnerable. Despite what nuclear scientists may profess (it is difficult to be neutral here since it is an industry now with competing forces that may not like the truth) the fact is that there isn’t any technology that can neutralise radioactivity. Germany’s decision to shut down its Nuclear Power plants (by 2022) is quite significant since nuclear energy contributes to about quarter of its energy needs. This a lesson for those who seek to see nuclear energy as energy of future. Clearly any source of energy has to be sustainable in the long run, and radioactivity is as much damaging (if not more) as increasing carbon footprint. Angela Merkel said it is a "transformation towards efficient and renewable energies, with all the opportunities that it has, for exports, development, new technologies and jobs”It is astounding that sustainable source of energy is not given as much importance as was needed till recently, i guess with the world reaching the tipping point (or have we already crossed it) the addiction with hydrocarbons will have to give way to renewable sources. Sun seems to be the answer, not only taping and storing sunlight but the fusion reaction. When i was studying in school there was lots of excitement about nuclear fusion (“to light the whole city with a glass of water”) and superconductivity. Wonder what happened to these?
