There have always been successful
attempts by Indian elite to twist narration to work in their depraved end. The mediocre
debauched society and its crude ways are quite an illustration of it. That these depravities are now mainstream narration
of culture and tradition shows their clout and hold over this godforsaken society.
It was reported that two Dalit children have drowned. This is how they twist it
for requirement, this mischief is also to bring in their conspicuous compassion
and crude opportunism that this society is so famous for. Dalit is a reference
to point out discrimination and mindset functioning herein; it is not an identity
of an individual. Identifying these with incident that has no reference to discrimination
is a clever ploy to solidify identity that is functioning out of squatter’s
conceptions, this also a valiant attempt to morph decadent home truths as they
playact liberals. There is also an attempt on ‘Dalit literature’, as if a new
organism is seeking light hence our duty to bless. Classifying people, putting
hierarchy and then intellectualising is been a favourite pass time around here
for a very long time, in the intricacies of these they find philosophies of
redemptions. There is also a clever ploy to track similarities between ‘Dalit
literature’ and Afro-American studies. Clearly there is a similarity in terms
of heinous discriminations and violence, but atrocities on Dalits and primitive
frameworks are much dreadful than any known form of organised atrocity in human civilisation. Afro-American was an identity, while Dalit is a reference,
indeed twisting Dalit as an identity is itself an attempt on discrimination, that is worse
than racism, and points to debauchery at work. Discrimination on Afro-American
was on race and physically identifiable pointers, which in some sense was quite
common during medieval period, as societies were quite closed and xenophobic. That
it took the form of racism is what makes the voices of Afro American narration distinctive
and empathy evoking. The difference here is that Dalit is a situation that is a
creation of depraved framework that works within, among itself. It is a form of cannibalism. Handiwork of wily squatters to usurp the
benefits and passing it into hereditary frame was an effortless consolidation. That
the primitive framework is still thriving and the conspicuous compassion dispensing
elite is cleverly tethered to it is what makes it uniquely terrible. Dalit and Afro-American
are definitely not the same narration, the experience of heinous atrocities much
similar but the framework entirely different. There is a clever attempt by Indian
elite to mix the two hence to show themselves as compassionate. They are attempting
to place themselves with civilised world, and jostling with enlightened sections
who try to give space to Afro-American voices and strongly condemn acts of
racism, Indian elite is also trying to find their traction in this hallowed circle.
Gandhi was hoisted quite successfully, evidently everything else was muzzled in
this juggernaut of conspicuous compassion; the apostle of peace narration quite cleverly
hid the depraved elite and their primitive ways. They therefore sashayed the
world ramp with compelling ease, representing and consolidating themselves as
peaceful souls.
While racism is condemned around
the world and Afro Americans are protected from these discriminations with structures
and policies under place (gun hugging white Americans falling behind in the civilizational
scale). The primitive structures that created and authenticated Dalit atrocities
are still in place, and not at all shocking is the Indian elite's attempt on positing as benevolent
and competing with West as enlightened souls. The habitual offenders have
created Dalit narration to match Afro-American, hence show themselves, therefore
Indian society, as beacons of kindness. These ingenious attempts must be
exposed, primitive Indian elite shouldn’t be allowed to squiggle in the cloak
of some eastern mystic with unique elevated connection to truth, reality is much mucky.
Post script: After the blasts in Bangkok, one clever fellow was
quick to hit the button. He lamented the fact that India is not leveraging its ‘historical
cultural’ connections with East Asia. The blast happened near Hindu temple is what
got him excited, it was pushed in that the temple brought in positive energy, predicted by astrologers, hence balance to calamitous world that only some
have the tricks for quick fix solutions. It is clear that the bomb blasts didn’t fall
into positive. So how are we going to cover that one, squatter embedded journalist
should have the alibi. In the meanwhile in the midst of the unfolding tragedy
he seemed offended that ‘brahmins’ are replaced by Buddhist monks in ‘saffron robes’,
but is satisfied that atleast clandestinely Hindu ways are practised, having witnessed
‘brahmin decedents’ at work in the royal palace. Incidentally this fellow’s enthusiasms
were not shared as he was corrected, ‘Indic influence’ as our man went gaga on Indian
civilizational influence. Sane people don’t want to have any reference to Indian
“civilizational” influence -the predominating narration being that of obnoxious squatter,
this our man doesn’t really get. This scoundrel who is masquerading journalist needs
to understand that opposite happened in India as Buddhist temples were grabbed
by squatters and converted into spots of debauchery in the meanwhile the
temples in East Asia incorporated the subtleties and refined ways, quite clearly
squatters didn’t have any place in such narration. That is the difference between
Hindu religion of East Asia and the subtle practises that evolved through Buddhism,
and squatter controlled Indian Hindu temples that remain spaces of decadence
and unethical ways that gets continuously replicated as it spreads into other
fields and sustains. It is a mindset, hence attitude. While they target Radhe maas of the world, the debauchery inside temples and how it
corrupts souls is ignored. Not surprising, as this will expose lot of home truths
and crude foundation of some ever purifying conscience keepers, including some accuracies
on mahatmas and pundits.
It is also getting clear (atleast
from this fellows claim) that ‘royal’ families in Thailand got their nourishment
on elevated thyself from hobnobbing with squatters, if not now atleast few centuries back, –who are renowned for the ability
to churn out creative otherworldly alibis to suit the occasion, hence the ‘royals’
in Thailand find themselves indispensably entitled. Monarchy is a disgraceful anachronism
of modern times, a joke played on common people as also severe flaw in sensibilities
of equitable dealing.
