Friday, September 21, 2018

Dealing with Indian high moral ground dwellers


Indians, particularly the elite sections, have severe affliction to posture as caretakers of the world (and on a fine sunny day even universe is in the ambit of influence). Arguably the self-professed entitled of the primitive society seems to carry the burden of ever higher morals passed on from sanctum vacuum blessing. They posture as opinion makers and influencers from ever expanding putrid pit, and every attempt is made to normalise these. With very few and rare exceptions their output is not only mediocre but have over the decades with firm grip over mainstream narrations severely degraded the society and reduced a promising society into more than many ways as basket case of the world. It is therefore necessary to conduct following test so as to not fall into high placed chicanery that accompanies wonderful turn of sentence (that constantly mesmerise british fluffs -a definitive reference, that some have been adopted as exotic diversity pets with monster mullahs) so as to be not carried away. Hence when reading or listening to an Indian, particularly those prone to take highest moral grounds at shortest of notice (includes the debauched gandhian blessed variety) check the following (akin to Bechdel test -a measure of representation in fiction):

First step: Does the fellow carry a casteist reference in his name or bearings? If yes drop him/her instantly. If no proceed
Second step: Does the fellow understand, and is sensitive, to the social context and historical framework of the opinion/news/events? If his/her opinion is social neutral, insensitive or shows lack of awareness, blatantly negligent to the reality of oppressed marginalised majority then drop him/her. The effort to understand is not worth the time however riveting the opinion, masquerading angst is an art around here indeed its virtue signalling with no skin -a common affliction of the blessed for big lick as caretakers/trustees.
Third step: If the fellow is aware of social context does the fellow take or position as anti-caste (in an effort to annihilate caste and primitive values herein) as has been the egalitarian traditions of this society or does he/she takes the clever ways of Castetva forces (cosy springboard of Hindutva forces) towards caste tolerance (enhanced by cunning gandhians, and positioned as non-violence to awe the world) -unique take on diversity of pus filled putrid pit. If yes drop him/her.

So as you can see it is extremely arduous task to weed out the muck. The western fattened fluffs who provide anchor to these caste apologists must be careful. There need to be zero tolerance for casteism they are as sinister a presence as the racist, Nazis and fundamentalist. Casteist louts are in the same company as feudal bigots and cannibals.