Continuing with article below...
These examples shows the level of
mediocrity of Indian media and the devious opportunists who control these. Such
is the obsequious connection to colonial masters that they constantly have the
urge for authentication from white man eking in london dustbin. These media
houses are not only incompetent but have absolutely no connection to any truth nor
are concerned about any indian reality except posturing for benefits, or most
importantly hinging to beneficial narrations for bigger gains. The embryonic
connection with british fluffs is also to be noted for english as defining
factor for arbitration even if it misses the point of what is being pushed in,
so is the fact that they really don’t have any worthy columnists, except
brands. It doesn’t matter though as not many read these. Large content reading
has seen a massive drop in recent times as people have many outlets to choose from and their
attention span is now reduced to tree dwelling species. This therefore is the
echo chamber of despicable elite that one has the occasion to peek.
Today I was reading one pravasi bharat
posturer in the same newspaper (always make sure to return the newspaper to
seller, deny even a single penny to them). While writing on Islamophobia (a
touchy subject for cunning manipulators, since they are confused in the fast
changing dynamics as to where the lick is) he very confidently asserts that “…Any
perusal of Islam, by laymen, by theologians, by scholars and renowned Imams
will prove that the religion does not, in any interpretation, instruct people
to tie explosives to themselves and kill innocent people. Neither does any
interpretation of the Quran or the Hadith justify driving vans into people
walking on the pavements of Westminster Bridge. These are far-fetched willful
medieval interpretations unacceptable to most Muslims in the contemporary world…”.
These kind of statements will definitely get him admirers in the ecosystem that
is being nurtured wherein religion is being positioned as benign force. This is
serious matter and shouldn’t be allowed to be passed into mainstream by these devious
anglers without scrutiny. Religion is without any exception segregatory and
works against creation of free community with thinking contemplative individuals
connected to realities and fickleness of forces of nature and are ready to face
emerging challenges and opportunities. Religion not only produces unthinking
followers but opens space for exploitation and brutalities as also takes humans
away from the exciting realities and contemplative possibilities to replace it with
grand fictions that further alienates humans. The delirious effects of these delusions
we are seeing all around us and persistently worked to diminish our reality. Every
religion has provided space for violence in varying degree and islam is
definitely not an exception (there are enough mentions in ‘holy books’ that
points to acceptance of violence, however benignly one may try to interpret,
indeed, why should one work to interpret? Why aren’t these in simple
unequivocal language if it is meant to spiritually guide humans?).
Significantly, if the society is ready to accept something written few
centuries back as ultimate truth, and is incapable to factor in evolving understandings,
ideas and evolution of societies all through the ages then there is something
seriously wrong. It is a serious incursion into humanity and progressive value
system on which human rights are hinged on. It is an assault on intellect and
insult on basic intelligence of individuals and common sense. It is a deep gash
on empathy and tolerance, and this is precisely what religion is pushing in (and
in its perversity claiming to be victim of the same).
This has to be
understood, and it is about time to turn the table on religion as to why is
that it segregates and is incapable to accept its fallacies and limitation, and
be humble to the human predicament? Also, why is it exciting reactionary forces
and regressive value system across the world? This denial of abortion in a US state
has everything to do with religion. The oft repeated excuse of it being wrongly
interpreted doesn’t rub any more we have well past it. If it is interpretable
then the religion is at fault for allowing it to be interpreted. The onus is
very much on the religion. There is absolutely no reason to see religion as
benign force, indeed it need to be put in strident scrutiny on every available occasion.
Not an inch of hard earned space for empathy and individual liberty must be acceded.
History is witness to amazing level of atrocities in the name of religion as also
inspired by religions, this framework have always been against progressive
ideas –the same that nurtured value system encouraging critical faculty of
questioning, doubting and inquiring that has led to spectacular understanding
of forces of nature and development of modern amenities.
It is about time religions
are opened to strident critical scrutiny, instead to being treated as sacred
and outside the realm of inquiry or criticism. Religion is churning lots of BS
and misery, and it is increasingly clear that it is not part of the solution
but is here to accentuate problems while dehumanizing and keeping ordinary
people in juvenile mindset that is easy to be exploited. It is therefore
unfortunate that Britain is moving towards recognizing islam on par with race,
hence in a strange appalling travesty, racism as islamophobia. Britain has been
seriously compromised, and the wave of rise of reactionary forces across West
can be quite easily be traced to spread of these insular regressive value
system which is sought to be protected in the garb of religion. And the
pretentious fattened fluffs trying to hide their hypocrisies and hedonistic
lifestyle, add to it the angst of colonial exploitation, have turned them into
pliable patronizers who are ever ready to lower the benchmark of human dealings
(so much so that monster mullahs thrive with all comfort taken care). Britain,
specifically, has created more misery to the world than any other country. It’s
about time that international community take note of this. This woman “baroness”
(look at the irony) Sayeeda Warsi is dangerous and is in the same league as
Nigel farage, Marine le pen, Geert Wilders…She shouldn’t be allowed to play the
Muslim angst (a religion which definitely needs to reform, it has become a
burden on common people and evolved sensibilities). There is no denying that
there is rise of racism, but it should be dealt separately and shouldn’t be
allowed to mix with religion and create this devious excuse for serious
encroachments.
Religion is a subjective reality, unlike race
or gender (this too is becoming quite fluid, one hopes even race becomes
immaterial as societies evolve), the attempts to solidify it as objective need
be fiercely resisted. This regressive anachronistic presence shouldn’t be
allowed the prominence in human dealing that it seeks, and must be firmly put in
its place. Meanwhile attack and abuse on individuals pursuing their faith must
be dealt as law and order issue, and not as a systemic problem since the system
in itself is under scrutiny and surely has dubious juvenile value context. Attack
on individual is different from attack on faith. Individual is real while
faith is part of a system that isn’t real, a human conception, hence cannot carry the same gravity
nor it should ever. Systems will have to fulfill the needs to protect human
rights and individual liberty as also evolve with the logics and awareness of
the realities, empathizing with the predicaments.
If common people are
moving towards xenophobic right, that too in societies that is deemed to be
progressive, where citizen are known to be more open minded and empathetic to
varying viewpoints, and have vibrant democratic institutions, then the religion
concerned must be put into scrutiny. Nothing is sacrosanct and to be accepted as if ordained,
least a religion. Take for instance the recent protest by parents against
egalitarian teaching in schools (found as age appropriate and valuable by
experts) for inclusive society on the ground that it goes against their religion. This
is significant pointer to understand what we face and how it is eating into the
society. As it is humane space in the world is reducing (by the onslaught of religion
and capitalism greed poison). Hence it becomes urgent that religion shouldn’t
be allowed any space to intrude into egalitarian value system. There must be
increase in phobia against system that restrict and restrain humanity, undermines
human values, dignity and liberty, which seeks to bludgeon humans into
unthinking followers whose critical faculties are systematically weakened. There
must be religiophobia. There must be islamophobia. There must be hinduphobia. Religions must be critically
examined and stridently opposed wherever and whenever it encroaches on human
rights and poses as benign presence on the misery of people. Religion is a
threat hence it cannot play victim. Individuals can be victims, this can be
dealt on case by case basis with the rule of law taking extra care that regressive value
system is not normalized or accepted in any form.
These attempts to
mainstream regressive frameworks in the guise of faith and capitalizing on angst
of common people is a serious incursion on basic human rights. Values
associated with liberty and equality are hard won with lots of sacrifice by
remarkable people that helped in civilizing human societies and giving hope to
each individual. These values have always been persistently threatened by
powerful entrenched groups and regressive value system that always find easy
alibi in religion (which ofcourse presents itself as such, it is indeed futile
to find otherwise from something that was written many centuries back working
on entirely different context and space, the brutalities and insecurities). As it
is these hard won values that assures humanity a space to exist is tenuous and on ever
shrinking grounds in most societies. Britain must take responsibility against
these serious incursions. History will never forgive, nor will the future
generations.