Wednesday, July 24, 2019

Devious word play to negate egalitarian value system


I thought i will deal with these scoundrels through twitter (already the framework is laid, so few tweets here and there as the situation and context would do), and really don’t have time for these manipulators. But problem is these high end vicious bunch have severely degraded and cannibalised the society while keeping firm control over narration, percolating it through herds (as Sant Ravish –specially nurtured to contain and control angst, says yeh hui na baath) this then is cleverly manipulated to work out benign narration indeed to a level where caste racist cheapskate give vision of mahatma. They also have spread across the world, and specifically to Europe –more specifically Britain, they thrived while degrading the surrounding –the Indian infection spread when there is an ecosystem of putrefaction, and with monarchical democracy, with entitled presences in the democratic institutions the caste feudals ensconce to comfortable breeding ground. The angst filled british fluffs have been nurturing these as beleaguered colonial victims –who in turn carry enlarged pupil so as to be fed. Since these caste feudal masquerading liberal secular don’t have any value system (mostly heuristic to manipulate) leapfrogging from squatter’s moral vacuum they sniff every opportunity for degradation meanwhile cleverly posing as benign liberal. The worst of islam through monster mullah is therefore a natural choice. The degradation of Britain through deviant multiculturalism has much to do with Indian infection carried by the cunning caste feudal expertising in nuances and semantics of deception. British fluffs fattened in their own muck and colonial angst have constantly nurtured these. This has become a threat to the world as xenophobic extreme forces gain ground at the expense of genuinely vulnerable exploited populace across the world. In the play of posturers the society is the looser.

 This precisely is how caste feudal have been negotiating their miserable world. So instead of defending and fighting or showing any signs of competence for the same against exploiters, invaders and colonisers these nincompoops were always ready to negotiate (and in the absence of any other choice these are sought to be morphed as nonviolence by a crude horrendously violent society, and then the audacity to position as overseer of the world), accepting lowest common denominator, to keep their control over hapless people through intellectually challenged self defeating conception. It’s no wonder that this region's contribution to the humanity is rather dismal, and whatever is the claim is appropriated and plagiarised from the common people -who were indeed connected to the reality for survival (even as basic as the values of non violence through Buddhism, what horrendously primitive this society must been that is still sought to be resuscitated). So, the so called kings paid ransom to the colonisers while keeping their kingdom, and ofcourse these were done through exploiting the rich natural resources and hapless people. While for colonisers and invaders nothing was so very easy. Meanwhile squatters were at work with grip over power structures to further degrade the society into fancy conceptions limited by their own limited minds. These laughable nonsenses are sometimes churned out as Indian philosophy. The world must thank that these caste cannibals with amazing self assuredness of intellectually challenged are confined to subcontinent, as they spread they will carry the infection.

Billions of dollar worth was transacted to the invaders and colonisers as a compensation for keeping the deviant structure alive. So while some posed as freedom fighters to get the control back, common people were being exploited through resource depletion by colonisers and value depletion by squatters –who constantly sought to cannibalise even the soul after the human such was the depth of depravation of putrefying pit that even colonisers had to intervene. As the region slipped into amazing levels of depravities the colonisers sucked in while the effete elite became conduit of exploitation –even exchanging finer aspect on these matters. One of the things that emerged from these sinister interactions was a game conceived, as is known as cricket, and now rivals religion in entrapping and exploiting common people into non thinking consumer wastrels ecstatic about illusionary pride while the reality is as usual neglected. The deviousness, that closely work with squatter value system, has quite logically opened up for market to create trump like successes and blessings.  

The worst was when common people were being exploited by colonial forces and squatter’s horrendous value systems while the exceedingly cunning nincompoop native rulers guided by sanctum vacuum became the conduit. When India got independence these very nincompoop staked their own claim, habituated to exploit the weak and lick the strong and with no concept of any empathetic value system or intellectual rigor. During the early phase of this fledgling nation when resources where limited the state was forced to pay ‘privy purse’ to these nincompoops. Look at the irony they paid ransom to colonial forces by exploiting people and natural resources and now after independence they seek the same from democratic government. This devious exploitation continued till 1971 (for almost 25years, that means billions of rupees were paid off to these blackmailers) until when Indira Gandhi kicked the butt of these suckers. These parasites now posture as benign carriers of traditions, indeed warriors!

Trapping common people and exploiting them, their body, their soul, their surrounding, has been the constant endeavor in this part of the world, and with no value system it worked out deviant euphemism of communities to cannibalise another. With modern thoughts percolating across the world there is a threat perception from these entitled sucking grounds. Cunning Kasturi&Sons have been right at the forefront (with purity mami –the inhouse b*, sniffing for editorial strategy) even deviously posturing as siding left –the nuanced variety you pick up from debating clubs of hedonist bleeder elites in London. So now they recruit a caste scoundrel with squatter reference to defend and not defend casteism! Smart. The wriggling carries all the talent passed through generational inbreeding and sniffing. The fellow uses brahmanism as an entry point carefully scuttling caste, as if brahmanism is some new deal. Brahmanism is a vicious subset of casteism that is used by cunning to negate the context and hence undermine the anti-caste frame. It is a cunning attempt to posit that only some aspect of putrid cannibalistic conception is problematic. It is a play of semantics in an attempt to hinge to higher moral grounds entrenched in rotten pit. The crude caste cunning fellow gets on to the business. He writes... 

For a start, opposing ‘Brahmanism’ does not entail being ‘anti-Brahmin’. To do so would imply that all Brahmins are responsible for these atrocities. This is as preposterous as ascribing blame to all Muslims for any wrong committed in, say, the reign of Alauddin Khilji, or all British people for the Jallianwala Bagh massacre or, for that matter, all Hindus for the lynching of an innocent Muslim. We should not fall prey to this crude notion of collective responsibility. In a society which is riven by caste, a person may belong to the caste of Brahmins but not adhere to the core ethic of Brahmanism. He may even have morally disassociated himself from it. The resolution to burn the Manusmriti and thereby oppose Brahmanism was taken by Ambedkar jointly with G.S. Sahasrabuddhe, a chitpavan Brahmin.      
Let’s make it very clear opposing casteism means very definitely opposing any forms and expressions of caste. It means anti-brahmin in no uncertain terms. It also means every person adhering to caste is responsible for every caste atrocity committed anywhere anytime (indeed past too). Not doing this will be denying the anti-caste humanist traditions across the ages through egalitarian saints and evolved value system that sought to remove the scrooge of caste and casteism herein and other related primitive value system from Hinduism. The cheapskates attempt at using Ambedkar is devious (they tried to ignore the great soul, then erase him, and now since there is no option misuse him). Ambedkar meeting a ghantapavan squatter means nothing. You see caste in him (because that is your concern) i don’t see his name carrying anything which is indicative. Being against brahmanism is also being anti-brahmin anti-caste which most likely he was. In any case Bose meeting Hitler doesn’t make him Nazi. Nor does admirable Mahatma Ambedkar meeting some insignificant squatter make him accepting the putrid value system. This is not only mischievous but casteist meant to denigrate.     

There is no casteism without caste. Caste means nothing without the framework in which it function and nurtures. Caste is the beginning and end of casteism. It's a dehumanizing segregatory conception that has nothing to do with any value system, least faith and very least hindu religion which it has viciously ensnared and parasites. This attempt to separate the inseparable is futile and a cunning diversion to avoid uncouth hometruth and gene donor's fantasy while trying to sneak onto high moral grounds. Also, the attempt at comparing and equating casteism with other religion is devious but yes if as a muslim i glorify acts of Khilji or whoever then ofcourse i would be responsible for the atrocities. And yes, for British loving Indians, if britishers attempt to glorify colonialism then they are also responsible for the atrocities committed by colonialists -as it is they are severely compromised by continuing with theatre of royals. The society has used the resources exploited to create luxury for itself and citizens who enjoys these. The source of 'development' can be questioned. Also, if the monarchy and religion was direct gainer of colonialism and if they carry the same structure and pride for it then it is problematic. If on the one side a society suffers in the aftermath of untold exploitation while another reaps benefits then the source cannot be negated. If you are part of the system and are benefiting from that system then you are responsible for it. There is a collective responsibility. No amount of semantics and clever posturing will work.

And so when push comes to shove the fellow shifts to and fro from caste to religion. Atrocities against muslim is therefore posited as against hindu, binary. This again is a cunning move, since the value system that make people do such atrocities come, very definitely, from caste system that places hideous ideas of purity hence meat eating falls for easy option lynching. White cow sacredness is part of that evolved purity that pushed the beleaguered society to absurdity. It has nothing to do with loving animals (a concept pushed in through egalitarian thoughts of Buddhism into the primitive society) it has much to do with caste primed mindsets. This society is severely degraded and the last many decades have seen these getting institutionalised through primitives masquerading as liberal secular playing to western nuances. Unless corrective actions are not taken to negate caste and uproot it, to start with from government machinery, it’s going to get worse. Meanwhile posturers trying to capitalise on the angst needed to be weeded out. The problem is these cunning set have severely degraded the social science field too. Most sociology and anthropology works are shoddy and is written by Indians with limited intellect and valueless context with specific intention to spread their infection. This fellow is nurtured as political theorist in the center for studying developing societies. The irony and pity of it. Kasturi&Sons recruit needs to put in more effort. Kuch jyada hi charbi chad gayi hai tum logon me. Use more grey matter, and finer argument skills. This will not do. Using words like preposterous and then leaning on to scrotum scratching camaraderie, nepotism and entitlements is quite lazy. Arguments are not a ritual nor cunning manipulation but ardent effort backed by awareness, inquisitive critical mind, working on empathetic value system. Indians are mostly incapable and incapacitated to use these.