Of course I have seen the corrupt side of the Army too, I know some who got court martialed. Incidentally I know personally about recruitment related corruption and wouldn’t be surprised some caught in jaipur recently were known to me!!. If it can happen in 80s jaipur it must be big business now!. But I would like to stick to the positive side of the experience in this blog. In Chennai I was regular at transit camp and would interact with young officers who were mostly part of the battalion on move. I got along famously well, mostly my name was referred to get in touch to move around Chennai hangouts. I still recall few of them, one lieutenant I remember who was coming from Siachin had permanent swelling in his fingers, he told me lot about those places. They even showed me all the ammunitions and explained in detail. Man it was great. During Kargil war I was not into TV, nor was aware of details but yes tried to get the info on dead soldiers, should have known many of them. They were people who had lots of determination, sincerity of purpose and yes discipline. For instance you tell them meet at Anna Salai at so and so place at this time and you can expect them to be there sharp to the dot. Incidentally I too am very much stickler of time and have dislike for people who don’t take time seriously. Committing to other is a grave responsibility some people don’t understand this, I find that least amusing and take it as reflection on character of the person. What motivated those soldiers was not really money, looking back I wonder whether it is possible to have such people in contemporary market manipulated world. It is surreal.
Saturday, August 01, 2009
Crimson tide: now that is what we call a movie…
Wednesday, July 29, 2009
The balderdash of protecting the national interest…
Whether it is per capita emission or per capita consumption
The question is not about
Most people in this part of the world though don’t have such luxury and generally think in terms of saving money, so save fuel, therefore take shortcuts or share. The reason why fuel price increase is a sensitive issue, it has a cascading effect. Clearly most Indians don’t handle stress by going for long drive (that sounds almost insane). It is in the same class of indulgence sports like car racing also fall (dimwits refer it to as formulae one, no formulae there dude. Driving fast and wasting fuel is not smart). In
It is this very “opportunity” that is being packed as national interest. The logic of per capita fits in well. It serves their lifestyle at the expense of common people very well indeed. This blogger very strongly submits that national demarcations as a standard in deciding on issues threatening the world like global warming is short sited and grossly ineffective. This blogger though understands the practical limitations of declassifying nation-state. Though countries may have varying per capita emissions but to classify a country as single entity is grievously mistaken, there are entrenched interest groups in societies. In poorer societies they are looking for easy profit, exploiting nature at the expense of livelihood of poor marginalized people is easily done with corrupt system and complaint market driven elite. Clearly lifestyle choices of richer section of society is having a serious impact on livelihood options of poor, it’s very exploitative nature is unsustainable the reason why we are in such state of affair. Paradox here is capitalism is hinged on consumption, it is amazing they still haven’t found any better alternatives. Clearly the model of development is seriously questioned.
The leaders at
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
Monday, July 20, 2009
Please god rain in the catchment areas !!
There is a well next to my house that was dug in mid 1940s, about 30 odd feet deep, it was always full of water till two years back, then it went dry no amount of rain fills even a centimeter. An old man (he doesn’t forget to mention that he was a graduate when
Despite rains
Shocking: I was shocked to see Swami Agnivesh in some trash discussion the other day (saw it for five odd minutes, no time for nonsense, just to check what he had to say), it is disheartening to see him participating in what I would say vulgar. It saddened me lot and even contemplated removing him from dedication (it may not matter to him or the world but for me it is quite significant). Not about what he said (he still is an amazing man), on why he need to participate in these nonsense which is meant to promote some trash program (that I think it is about talking personal details to make disproportionate amount of money kind of question program, it is new low but who is bothered). Swami Agnivesh has degraded himself by encouraging these trashes, there is no excuse for encouraging or even allowing crude people one’s attention. He needs to be aware that there are people who can misuse, his view doesn’t matter what matters is publicity for these people good or bad. Infact they create controversy (against themselves too) for cheap publicity and if you could package it as freedom of expression or other egalitarian ideals then crudeness gets legitimacy.
Swami Agnivesh is expected to more responsible and show some dignity by denying these disgusting people or has he also got bug of TV channels like small timers. This blogger think he doesn’t need these manipulations. I still have admiration for him as I have listened to him many times during 1997-98, so these incidents does dent but any other breach it is over. Very upset about this.
I recall a seminar on ‘value education’ I happen to participate a decade back where he spoke at length (those days I was trying to have an in depth understanding on Education, even visiting schools in Uttrakhand to later some in south India). Later I even decided to dedicate sometime to teach street children. I recall going to Salam Balak trust (finding address even in posh colonies of south
By the way Ela Bhatt is another person I forgot to mention, what an amazing woman. Few months back while traveling I came across these girls from US who had come as exchange students to a college in Bangalore. I was traveling from Jodhpur to Bangalore and they got in from Ahmedabad to the same compartment. They were studying Sociology and had gone to Ahmedabad for studying more on woman emancipation. The shocking part was when asked about SEWA they showed ignorance. That really upset me (what kind of brief these kids given before being send for tour by teachers?). I spend some precious time to explain about Ela Bhatt and SEWA and that there couldn’t be any better place to visit for knowing about woman’s emancipation than this, I recall even writing down the details on paper for them!!.
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
Celebrating wonderful trees
The trees cut could also be transplanted, I am sure many would be ready to contribute to the expense, that though is the least thought when trying to replicate New York or Dubai. Trees don’t grow in few months so the excuse of afforestation is rather crude. Many trees in big Indian cities exist because religion (specifically proto Hinduism) has saved them otherwise they would have easily cut and destroyed!!. This tree was saved recently while hundreds were cut has to thank this ancient temple.
Trees, like all plants, sequester (absorb and store) carbon dioxide as part of the process of photosynthesis, which enables them to grow. Through this process, carbon dioxide is converted into stored carbon, and this is why trees are sometimes referred to as 'carbon sinks'. By taking this carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, trees clean the air, reduce temperatures, and counteract our polluting lifestyles. Tree planting in urban areas is a great way to give something back to the environment. Trees are highly 'carbon smart' and, as well as absorbing atmospheric carbon dioxide, can help mitigate against climate change in a number of ways: a) Trees can also save as much as 10% of annual energy consumption around buildings by moderating the local climate keeping it cool in summer and warmer in winter. b)Tree canopies reduce rainstorm impact and provide a natural alternative to resource-heavy flood control systems that depend on hard engineering. c) Trees help to filter harmful pollutants from the air, making areas with many trees healthier places to be than areas without trees. d) Trees create vital wildlife habitats, enabling more species to thrive in their surroundings (the placard is taken from mysore zoo) .
In addition to their positive physical differences to the environment, trees also add beauty to the urban landscape, and tree planting is a wonderful way of bringing different communities together around a shared goal ( the above is taken from Net at Trees for cities).
Meet Wangari Maathai: this lady from African subcontinent (Kenya to be specific) was the one who brought to the focus of the world the issue of environmental degradation with issues of human rights and democracy. In announcing the award in 2004, the Norwegian Nobel Prize Committee said, “Peace on Earth depends on our ability to secure our living environment.”
“Through the Green Belt Movement, thousands of ordinary citizens were mobilized and empowered to take action and effect change,” Maathai said in her December 2004 Nobel address. “They learned to overcome fear and a sense of helplessness and moved to defend democratic rights.”
Maathai didn’t necessarily see these connections when she started her work. In the beginning, planting trees was simply a direct way of meeting the needs of rural women — the primary caretakers of their families — for firewood, extra income, prevention of erosion, clean drinking water, and better crop yields. Similarly, deforestation causes rivers to dry up and rainfall patterns to shift.
But there was another, equally important, and long-term result, according to Maathai. These women, she says, “are often the first to become aware of environmental damage as resources become scarce and incapable of sustaining their families.”
Environmental concerns are linked to broader issues of good governance and protection of human rights. During her campaign Wangari Maathai has been arrested, imprisoned, and beaten when her grassroot campaign took on endemic corruption in the government — especially over plans to build an office tower in the middle of Nairobi’s Uhuru Park. In her Nobel address, Maathai said that although the Green Belt Movement didn’t initially address political issues, “It soon became clear that responsible governance of the environment was impossible without democratic space. Therefore, the tree became a symbol for the democratic struggle in Kenya. ... In time, the tree also became a symbol for peace and conflict resolution.”
You can visit Wangari Maathai website through the link herein in the blog…
The snap below is taken from very close to where I stay. The owner of this building could have easily cut the tree, that was the easiest option, as they have in done in west. But our man has different understanding of life and surrounding and also development. If ordinary people are ready to spend extra few rupees to save their surrounding then why can’t the planners. It is astounding the lack of application of mind. I am sure housing colonies would be ready to spend few thousand rupees to transplant trees, that are chopped, to their localities. Has the government thought about these ideas, or is it cut cut and cut for aggressive growth?. Incidentally when the monsoon was delayed policy makers started to sweat, although this blogger hopes there are no droughts but would like to see one. That should jolt them out of the stupor. Under the economic understanding of growth monsoon is a factor. And this factor is expected to be constant also referred to as normal monsoon as if rain happens because they are meant for economic growth because economist want it!!. Under this understanding clouds brings rain and so it rains (like stork bring babies!). From what I have studied trees have an important contribution on rain, ground water, ecosystem. So tomorrow if there are no rains and no drinking water don’t show surprise. Geez where the clouds with water gone?!!. They are supposed to come aren’t they?
Saturday, July 11, 2009
on world population day...
“The increase in the world population has vastly accelerated over the last century. It took the world population millions of years to reach the first billion, then 123 years to get to the second, 33 years to the third, 14 years to the fourth, 13 years to the fifth billion, with a sixth billion to come, according to one UN projection, in another 11 years.
Has development, in fact, done much to reduce population growth? There can be little doubt that economic and social development, in general, has been associated with major reductions in birth rates and the emergence of smaller families as the norm. This is a pattern that was, of course, clearly observed in Europe and
It is what people do when they have some basic education, know about family planning methods and have access to them, do not readily accept a life of persistent drudgery, and are not deeply anxious about their economic security. It is also what they do when they are not forced by high infant and child mortality rates to be so worried that no child will survive to support them in their old age that they try to have many children. In country after country the birth rate has come down with more female education, the reduction of mortality rates, the expansion of economic means and security, and greater public discussion of ways of living.
Post script: Amen
Tuesday, July 07, 2009
Sarkozy, market choices and modern savages
Rousseau was a significant inspiration behind French revolution, and the democratic principles on which civilized societies stand. What Rousseau refers to as virtue is what we know as ethics. The reason why I am quoting Rousseau is to point out that all great ideas that put the foundations of equitable society was based on ethics, an expectation of responsible behavior. All understandings of different religions and faith also stand on the same premise. The society as we know and cherish stands on the enlightened thoughts of some great people who strived to create ideals for the betterment of humanity.
What we are seeing in the contemporary world is a paradox of unbridled access to information and exciting possibilities with degradation of society through unsatiated greed and increasingly crude irresponsible lifestyle. The misplaced confidence of ‘great unthinking masses’ (to use Kant) is being sought to be channelised as freedom, as aspiration, as legitimate desires. Is it surprising that people who espouse liberal values are themselves repulsive opportunists?. Is it surprising that those who swear by god and call themselves religious resort to shocking expressions of faith?. In this scenario democracy becomes farce in the hand of few, religion becomes tool of oppression.
Business and commerce is important part of society but whether Adam smith or Weber (remember he had Protestant ethics as his reference) they emphasized on being responsible. Ethics here means that if my business is irrevocably damaging the environment and long term well being of society then it is unethical. Democracy therefore means that leaders take decisions to safeguard against these exploitations and dangerous implications on future. I don’t think it could get simpler than this; it is a very simple reality on which world leaders have to work at
In this increasingly crude world cherished institutions and great thought get easily manipulated by vested interests. Market opportunism has constructed freedom as independence to do nonsense and still feel euphoric!!. The ideals though were meant to necessarily go with responsible behavior otherwise it is not freedom, it is vulgar. It is in this world that religion also finds its extreme takers. The society it seems is extending its fringes of crudeness wherein the construct was for enlightened thinking and actions. So what we have is society of reactionaries, a society that individually and collective live by reacting to each other or situation, in this melee competence is downgraded and truth pushed out. They create their own reality. It is where extreme forms of vulgarity meet.
Democracy was not meant for conduit of market choices, nor religion for crude insensitive people. Nor Plato nor Rousseau nor Kant ever meant democracy to reduce to serve bunch of profit mongers at the expense of all other expressions and aspirations or even sustainability. When social relations, emotions and even human bodies are meant for the purpose of unabashed money making, when respect becomes sycophancy, when compassion is profit, when words becomes farce, when others are statistics, actions are compromises then we know something is grievously gone wrong and that such a system will lead to nothing but disaster. In Holy Koran there is a mention of modest dressing but enlightened words never conceived crude followers who could pack women in burqa (the full face covering) and still claim divine. Religion also is about power, male domination therefore does find enough reasoning. It is in this context of politically correct and incorrect world Sarkozy’s statements become ambiguous. He may be right or he may be wrong depends upon how much you stand to gain. Truth is the biggest loss in the contemporary world we live in.
These varied forms of vulgarities compete and they call it freedom of expression. Here we get cruder versions of liberty, secularism, profit, love, creativity, modesty, faith…, it’s a celebration of mediocrity. In gist it means you do your crap and we do ours. Live and let live. And yes we respect each other for that!!. And so we live in a free world. Modern savages. If this idea of living was so very ideal then why is environment/nature not ready to take the crap?. Clearly these are not true, therefore unsustainable. Nature doesn’t lie. Then that means there is truth, and we do see it all the time but are not ready to acknowledge. The crass world makes it impossible, so we flirt on the fringes of truth and justify ourselves for immediate gain. Somewhere this will have to end, we see glimpses of that in bombs, riots, cyclones…
Post script: readers are invited to short story blog, there is a new story I posted the other day. It is dedicated to incredible people like Swami Agnivesh, Medha Patkar, Aruna Roy, Binayak Sen, Vandana Shiva, Sugatha Kumari and so on. It is these people who make democracy vibrant. Indian society is proud of them.
Friday, July 03, 2009
The latest about Copenhagen summit
Morten Andersen 02/07/2009 16:50
“Copenhagen is faltering at the moment. The Americans are now fully engaged. But several countries are blocking the progress,” Sir David King, former British Chief Scientific Advisor, said at the World Conference of Science Journalists in London.
He also noted that both Canada and Japan have recently gotten rid of their scientific advisors, and both countries “are stepping into the breach and blocking progress.”
A weak agreement coming out of the UN conference on climate change in Copenhagen this December would be worse than no agreement, said Sir David King. According to Times Online he sees an ambitious bilateral agreement between China and the United States as a better alternative:
“If you had the Chinese premier Wen Jiabao and (Barack) Obama on the same stage, together with the EU position, this would be a strong move in the right direction.”
According to One World Net, the former British advisor has “a lawyer in his team working behind the scenes to find a legal formula that would enable the summit (the UN conference, editor’s remark) to be concluded with a general statement and a commitment that a protocol would follow in 2010.”
In his speech, Sir David King praised a Brazilian commitment to stop deforestation in 2025 and was optimistic about reaching an international agreement on forest conservation at this years UN conference.
Comments by a reader
Peter Wood
03/07/2009 04:13 If Canada and Japan don't cooperate, we can have a treaty without them. Countries can then charge border taxes on fossil fuel intensive goods, and border export taxes on fossil fuels exported to these countries. Probably not a good outcome for Japan's steel industry or Canada's tar sands industry, but a good outcome for the planet
Monday, June 29, 2009
Registering a protest with GOI by an Indian citizen…
By its very nature "exclusive" is partisan, governments are not here to work on the TRP of private channels. After every “high profile” case even senior police official are found giving interviews to TV channels. Is that there job?. Is this how state machinery function in a democracy?. Astounding. Secondly just because a case is high profile doesn’t mean that it gets precedence over others, since high profile word is a construct of market media in most cases (who leaks the video of narco test?. It is a serious case of privacy violation. Does this land have any privacy laws?). The recent rape case by small time hindi film actor was attempted to play through media. Fixers and manipulators got in and tried to subjectify the crime that was still under investigation. All norms and decency was thrown out, even the CM of Maharashtra was found reacting. What a shame.
This blogger agrees that a minister could give an interview to a particular channel or print media as part of getting to know the person- about the minister as a person and his overall views on issues, afterall he/she is a public person. But to give access to a particular TV channel or print media of his liking on every matter and his/her exclusive views is serious dereliction of oath he took (media and others are excited about who gets what during swearing-in ceremony…but what oath was read is much important. It is no small matter or routine. It has to be followed in word and spirit, otherwise why have these expensive mockery?).
When senior minister or official hobnobs with the media (clearly for personal gains later, it’s a tacit understanding) it has direct influence on morale of the junior members and staff, it sets a bad precedence and culture of sycophancy. This is one way corruption gets institutionalized. Generally when most ministers are from
Post Script: this blogger congratulate the Education minister Kapil Sibal for the revolutionary steps taken to make the education system sensitive and learning an enjoyable process. Round of applause for that!!.
Condolences: Lohithadas was a one of the brilliant script writer and director this nation has seen in recent times. This blogger is personally indebted to him. It so happened that my understanding of Malayalam movies in my earlier part of life was limited, just few movies in VCR or DD, so when I was studying in college (in my first year) Kireedom was released. It was a path breaking movie and it had immense influence on me (incidentally it was my very first movie in Kerala), i started to have great liking for Malayalam movies. That period also coincided with some amazing movies being made, I was hooked. Lohithadas had scripted many of these movies, it was sensational to say the least. Later while in
Lohithadas belonged to a tradition that had produced some of the greatest malayalam film directors like Bharatan,
Friday, June 26, 2009
Gone too soon…
This blogger was appalled and angered by his doings in the later part of his life. But I guess there are many part of people they are not able to handle, it saddening to see brilliant people break like that, it got really weird. He was in public right from the tender age of 5 that must have been tough. I liked many of his songs prominent being “lets make this place a better place…”(it is a very sensitive song), “we are the world” (for
What really endeared me to him was what I watched in one of the music channel today, I haven’t listened to this song previously. It is a tribute to a beautiful boy Ryan White who died of AIDS. The song is titled “gone too soon”, I regret not listening this earlier. Michael Jackson might have sung many songs but this one has created a place for him in my heart that will remain forever intact. Despite all the blemishes he was such a wonderful guy. He should have been given a chance to redeem himself. It is an unfair death.
To boldly go where no man (or woman!!) has gone before…
Star Trek had an astounding affect on me, till then life was about mythology wherein chariots could fly and so on. Star trek brought in science fiction. Science fiction means extrapolation of technological future or postulation of future that is logically consistent. Myth and fantasy based stories had magic or unexplained occurrences that were attributed to mystical powers. It was Arthur Clark who blurred the line of science fiction and science fantasy by introducing magic consist with logic.
I always wondered why science fiction not part of school curriculum?.(Note here science fiction is not same as science and therefore should be handled separately nor is it meant to make science interesting- tool of pedagogy. This blogger is arguing science fiction as different stream or additional chapters or exercises to ponder). We didn’t have even a chapter, I assume they don’t have it even now. That is shocking. Infact science fiction is an important understanding. Its implications are significant. They are the guys who predicted airplanes, submarines, spaceships, tanks, cyberspace, robot and so on. How could we ignore them?. Few science fiction writers need be noted here: Isaac Asimov (who first discussed artificial intelligence and made laws for ethical robots: "A robot may not injure humanity, nor, through inaction, allow humanity to come to harm" and so on, became premise for many other science fiction), HG Wells (time travel in Time Machine), Arthur Clark (well known for Space Odyssey-2001 with Kubrick. Speculating on geostationary satellite as also wireless communications, he even wrote time table upto 2010), George Orwell (1984- was about totalitarian future), Mary Shelley (Frankenstein, arguably the first science fiction, was inspired by nightmare she had!!) but it was French writer Jules Verne who is considered father of science fiction. Verne is credited with impressive predictions. His anticipations of the future included the moon landing, the helicopter, air conditioning, automobiles, and even the Internet! (remember it was 19th century). Verne's most famous works include 'Journey to the Center of the Earth,' 'From the Earth to the Moon,' 'Twenty Thousand Leagues under the Sea,' and 'Around the World in Eighty Days.’ Science fiction movies that were immensely popular in recent times include Jurassic park series (Attenborough, you can trust Attenborough brothers for brilliance) was written by Michel Crichton- his understanding on global warming though was more fiction than science!!. Bush administration tried to use him. This blogger is a great fan of science fiction movies (my first few English movie was Terminator, I can’t conceive terminator without
Science fiction need be important part of children’s growth, the understanding of present action/inaction and its probable implication on future for not only himself or herself but the society, the world or the life as we know is what science fiction construct itself on. Children need to understand these, the need for responsible use of science and knowledge. It also is a vicarious experience to a possible world constructed on extrapolating the present, the implications of our actions. Science fiction also provides a space for collective fear on where we are and where we go. The issues facing the world right from social implications of cloning to environmental catastrophes of human actions are important in the education of young generation. Science fiction therefore can be an important tool in understanding technological innovation and social consequences. This helps us to be more vigilant, preparing intuitions not necessarily being paranoid. Don’t know whether to use the word intuition but yes cognitive skills that is more emotional, creative than factual, lacking context. It makes children proactive and instill responsible behavior, it could also give them confidence to be visionaries. It makes them ask realistic questions that are less abstract and more real to the world as they experience and anticipate.
Another aspect of science fiction is presenting a counter culture, an understanding of societies different from ours or how we could change in future. Implication here is that what we consider as permanent may not be. This helps in preparing us for change, questions traditions and opens new possibility that the present structure cannot even conceive. Science fiction can be an important tool for non fictional forecasting and preparing us for radical changes and tolerant to evolving social institution.
Science fiction as change speculators has the potential to create agents for change. The diversity of choices and multitude of paths it can lead is dependent on choices we make now is what these fiction teaches.
Post script: phew…that was quite exhausting. And so I will have to finish the above with a light hearted incident. Once a journalist inquired Arthur Clarke (one of the greatest science fiction writer who died in 2008. Space elevators anyone?!!), whether he was gay. Clarke replied "No, merely mildly cheerful". Good one!!.
Trivia: Arthur Clarke became a Sri Lankan citizen and was Chancellor of a University for a very long time, he is buried in Colombo.
Tuesday, June 23, 2009
Tragic events in Iran
This blogger happen to listen to Ayothallah’s speech, he spoke with lots of passion. Clearly there is a huge following (I found the part of “extreme views leading to extreme reaction” interesting). The elite seem to have genuine concern for a just society as was envisaged by the revolution that uprooted the feudalism in 1979. There are few concerns though (this I express as a very concerned outsider). Although despite the best intentions of Ayothallah that “Islamic nation of
Religio-political elite in
Post script: though we know there is something gone wrong in
Saturday, June 20, 2009
A Greenpeace initiative
I got this forward few days back thought it to be important to put in my blog. Plz visit http://www.greenpeace.org/international/campaigns/climate-change/take_action/leaders-go-to-copenhagen-climate-summit for more. Don't forget to sign the petition...
President Barack Obama, United States of America
President Hu Jintao, People’s Republic of China
President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, Brazil
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, India
President Nicolas Sarkozy, France
Prime Minister Gordon Brown, United Kingdom
Chancellor Angela Merkel, Germany
Dear leaders,
I call upon you, not as representatives of your countries, but as leaders of the world, to personally attend the United Nations Climate Summit in Copenhagen this December.
Decisions which will be made at this meeting will impact the lives of everyone alive today, and determine the shape of humanity’s future.
This is the world’s best chance to avoid runaway climate change.
You owe it to the world to attend, to set aside your national interests, to safeguard our future, and to do what you were elected to do: lead.
My request is simple: promise now to personally attend.
Post script: In context to the last blog, Mr. Ramesh have taken some stern steps with regards to illegal miners in Karnataka and he personally visited Corbett park, that definitely is a great start. This blogger is also enthused by his statement on need for "tiger ecosystem".