More than anything else it is the
effete elites, working out their coterie cosiness in the feudal casteist
pits and monarchical squalor, who seem very concern about their slipping role as
guardian of liberalism (that has no resemblance to liberty whatsoever) as they
soak in hedonistic choices and climb ever higher moral ivory tower. It is clear it is
not about piece of cloth nor is it about women’s choice on any matter. It is
simply a pernicious system that rides in the name of religion that this cloth
represents and perpetuates which is the concern here. It is not about minority
rights since religion cannot be seen as an overarching identity of individual
that quite conveniently sidesteps human values. It is about a system that has
pupated in the worst of social realities, and is a fertile source for gender
discrimination and segregation. The modesty garb that hides patriarchy which
see woman as object of gaze hence needs to stay hidden, this cloth is a symbol
of that primitiveness that seeks to thrive. Indeed it is not even about the
cloth but the mindset it supports and perpetuates. It is also about amazing
level of arrogance that belligerently bulldoze itself in the garb of modesty
–the higher claim for sickening righteousness, in the spaces that is public and
innocuous. Further, it is very vehemently pushing the perverse idea that people
who carry symbol of religion are in some sort touchstone of freedom and
barometer of human progress. The reality being these are ridiculous and
pathetic ideas devoid of any spiritual subtlety or sensitivity that seek to
aggressively assert itself with impunity and selfishness at the cost of local
communities. They don’t have any concern for others but push in their god given
right, the reason why monarchists and casteist putrids are besotted to mullah’s
degradation; it is a front that undoubtedly hides their depravities and stinking
home truths. Indeed by pushing degradations in religion the effete elite posits
itself as kindred souls without any involvement in common people’s tribulation,
probably not even aware of it. It is amazing how they usurp the democratic
space as spokesperson of high moral grounds without even caring to even move
their fat ass from pits of monarchy or casteist feudalism. There is a
mischievous comparison to nuns, this choice of outfit though regrettable is
about celibacy and not sexual objectification. Secondly, one must scrutinise
societies where these originate and conditions of weaker sections in such
places and mindset on which these thrives. It is not about cloth but the
mindset and attitude, the progenies carries these traits in the most modern of
settings and see themselves misfit and victimised, and then they ask; where are
we going wrong? It’s how effete elite tries to maintain their hegemony by
creating and pursuing victims. It is amazing the kind of regressive revivalism
seen in West particular by migrants, who ironically represent societies that seemed to
have failed them in some way, the reason why they are migrating in the first
place. That they are unable to assimilate freedom and hope that host societies
represent. Very much reasoned by amazing levels of human achievements, that indeed is the reason why I am able to
write these and within few seconds anyone across the world can read it. This
spectacular world is what this blogger will strive to protect with all my might
and being, fully aware that these are not accidents or miracles but a mindset
and attitude that is made possible by sensibilities that thrive on human
potentials. It is hinged on beauty of life and living herein.
Religion is not a human identity;
it is a human construct that is severely degrading societies. It cannot be a
stand point on human right because humans are individuals and that liberty of
individual carries the right of freedom. A social system can exist if it doesn’t
curtail this freedom, any symbol of a system that stands on discrimination and
prejudices cannot be asserted as right. Nor an idea that emerges from this
system be sustained as only an idea or diversity of thought since an idea is
about freedom of thought of an individual not as a representation of a system
but representing humanity. Hence ideas emerging from system if it incites then
it will have to be curtailed since it is representing the system hence by
extension to the group that follows the system therefore incendiary against
others. It no longer satisfies the definition of individual right hence human
right. Significantly it is the rights of children that need protection from
this religion driven brainwashing and indoctrination, and state has role to
play as secular entity to protect and educate young minds to severely question
religion and miracle driven nonsense. Children are not property of parents nor
of state, these can only guardian who provide free space to grow. This freedom
to grow into individuals is the beginning of basic human right, everything else
is peripheral. The state, and society, is duty bound to protect this
freedom.

It is high time that religion is pushed back
to its place and followers held as set of people who haven’t really come in
terms with reality, to their senses, and live in collective hallucination and
holy books to go with it, which except for few pages here and there, needs to
be dropped into the nearest dustbin. It is a loss to the potential of humans
and hopes of humanity. If you loose the ability to know good people when you see
one if you fail to acknowledge a good act when you come across one then the individual
is losing contact with his or her own self and society lost to delusion. If you
cannot differentiate bitter from sweet that means you have lost you sense. People
tend to loose sense when given choice of nation, religion and other constructs
that takes them away from reality. It is futile to see that which takes away
humanity as representation of human right.