Take action against this fellow

This blatant temple squatter breed has been strutting around for some time now. I am told he is some kind of a devious genius. Devious alright, genius my foot. He has been making wild allegations and mucking people for his nefarious reasons. Quite understandably other temple squatters, that includes, pretentious Kasturi & Sons have been fuelling him and providing him a base for years now. So much so for freedom of expression and objectivity. Left can only make its presence in TN if it dissociates from likes of Kasturi & Sons, people know these scoundrels and their deceitful ways, they lack credibility. It is clear this fellow has backing of some very powerful people. As I said, in Indian context things have to be viewed from entirely different framework, media freedom is just a ruse. 

Let’s come to the issue at hand, few months back, during Tehelka case, I was flipping through the news channel (it is a travesty) and during one of these so called discussion this fellow revealed the sexual assault victim’s name. It was a deliberate act of slander. Vinod Sharma (of HT) was very much there, and wimped, in a hilarious act of protest. Well with genocide recalling surname nothing much was expected of him. I dare him to put up a case and be responsible rather than waste his time sipping drink at IIC and staring at the ceiling, which I am told is how these people indicate their stature as senior priest.. oops..journalist among hang arounds. This silence has been baffling, even the Channel concerned could take it up or the judiciary as suo moto case. What is NCW doing for so many months??...well, i forget, we have another temple squatter heading it! I am thinking this to be a case of temple squatters nudge and wink camaraderie at work. This has worked for some time now and they have been able to significantly control the Indian narration but I guess it’s time up for these scoundrels. UN will have to convene a special session to declare India a racist country.   

The grandest publishers can do tap dance

I am terribly unconcerned about what is being reduced to pulp and the ensuing protest by India’s ineffectual intellectuals. There are two reasons: 

Firstly the Indian tradition of argumentation were mostly elitists, actions if ever were self serving this is because it traces its nuances and skills from temple squatters traditions which was almost always devoid of reality of surrounding or acute existential angst of people. This deviance is being hallowed by likes of Amartya Sen, not denying there is some truth to it but the overwhelming factor is that these were superficial to the surrounding as also mostly fell short of intellectual rigour and discipline (some like Shankaracharya was flash in the pan of 2500years old history). The otherworldly concerns were nothing but elaborate jokes. The reason why myths are given importance over facts since if you look at the facts there is nothing to point to the contributions of mediocre people. Thus there is no framework of intellectual presence in public space. Most critically, common people have instinctive distrust for intellectuals as they know these are self serving scoundrels who have congenital skills of twisting views in whichever direction that pleases. There is no tradition of earnestness as also their preoccupations with grand worldviews don’t find any resonance with people. We are now therefore reduced to talking shops of conniving knuckleheads; grievous social concerns are handled by market, lawyers, actors, brands so on as part of parampara. It about humility and entertainment.  

Secondly, the question is not what is being pulped by the grandest publisher. The question is what is not being published. The question is also what the media ignore. The question is also deviant nature of society. Publishers like market media are driven by concerns of profit, in Indian context it means amazing crass considerations, pandering to dominant views. Essentially it is a self-serving structure that leads to aggrandisement and grand omniscience of worth.

Every issue and concern of Indian elites falls woefully short of the reality and smack of hypocrisy and vulgar exaggeration. Whatever skills they may employ to attach to international narrations, the reality of India will not leave them. Indeed this is more than racism as the world understands, because in racism there is a tell tale sign of target, the difference is obvious but caste system that has completely dehumanised 'Dalits' and created a crude structure is targeting people who are no different. To target people who are racially similar and to commit genocide on them need unique civilizational skills. Also genocide here is not killing (probably the reason why the outsiders don’t get it, and temple squatters fake vegetarianism as sign of nonviolence!!), it is acute disparities and discrimination that is sought to be perpetuated over generations. If you are anywhere associated with Indian media that propagates these distinctions through matrimonial columns, complete blackout of issues of marginalised and carry genocide reminding surnames then you too are culprit and have no right to take high moral ground.

Yesterday UN report on North Korea was out, the commentators were horrified by the kind of atrocities committed on people. Among other things that are being quoted as sign of horrifying reality is that 23% of children are malnourished. Well in India its more than double that figure, and in Indian context this is not even horrifying, one squatter charlatan appearing on TV in all humility of shudh acharan and elaborating that you have to pour mustard oil on gods statue to prevent enemies while ‘pure ghee’ should be poured only for good work. We need UN report on this.

 Mediocre India is here to capture the world!! Ye Doniger mue kahan se tapak padi??

Images that stay for a long time…

Sometime back I was travelling in a train in one of those crowded unreserved compartments, I suddenly realised maybe I had miscalculated my next destination and could end up stranded late into the night in some godforsaken place. It got me concerned. I wanted to recheck my plans, at the critical moment the net connectivity of my phone was down. I rarely take out my laptop while travelling in squalor surrounding as it attracts attention, sometimes of the very wrong kind. It’s always better to keep a low profile while travelling, the advantages of blending in are many. Desperate I took out my laptop and plugged in the net, and was busy working out the details. A kid who could be about 7 or 8 years old unhinged himself from his mother’s lap and moved towards me, he put his hand on my shoulder, I gave the impression of being quite busy all the while aware of his movements. Slowly very deliberately he moved it along my arms, and rested it for a while. He observed me, while I managed to glance at his mother, a woman who looked much older than she was, wore a faded saree that was on the verge of tearing. The overused slippers just about manage to cling to her calloused feet. She too was observing the boy keenly. There was sense of pride, a glint in her eyes. The boy looked at his mother; she made a face indicating “what a big man you have become!!”, she smiled, he smiled back sheepishly. The boy wore a fresh ironed white shirt and his hair was neatly parted. There was something dignified about them, despite obvious desperation the fate of life had placed them in. The boy had by now started to touch the laptop, he was sensing the object. The moment it became clear that he had intruded and is disturbing. The woman plucked him and lodged him back to her lap. He laughed, she hugged him. She held him tight till he start to wriggle. In her fragile world she saw a glimpse of him that she willed. A boy who would grow up to be someone worthy, someone who could use these complicated things that she doesn’t understand but knows is signs of prosperity and importance. Maybe she doesn’t know there is also a world of darkness in these gadgets, and that these signs of prosperity and indicators of knowledge are many a time quite superficial and means to vile away time. But in the delicate world she live dreams comes quite easily. The anxiety of their lives see possibilities in these little opening for a better world, for a world that is reachable. The innocence weaves a wonderful possibility. Atleast that is what she thinks, and may her wish come true. The journey though is arduous and constantly widening disparities has made it extremely difficult. Still you wish them to be happy, all the while you know it is going to be quite tough, tragedy awaits the nearest corner. But then you think why do we want to go to future, why see everything in terms of expectations and fulfilment? This moment of aspiration is in itself a moment to cherish. Years later, when in one of his reflective moments he may find this very moment his solace, she too will long for this very instance. To love and be loved, there is nothing more than to it. She was happy, and the child too was contented to be briefly part of something bigger, though it is a fake. I too am not what they define as success, I too am fake! But what is important is the interlude of happiness, a pause from harsh realities of life.

 Many years back I saw this movie Naseem (directed by Saeed Mirza) at a film festival, though not a great movie but the ending was compelling, wherein the elderly man says a lie and is caught by the young girl. The man says “you have laughed, that is what matters”, truly one of the most brilliant lines, remarkably the movie ends with these lines and has stayed with me forever. At the end it is not the future but this moment that matters. In the crowded compartment of the train, people who are facing immense hardship and bleak future are smiling….well that really matters, atleast for that kid!! 

If Cocacola bechne wala boy can get Ratna why cannot my daru bechne wala beta get Padma!!

…that was mediocre lyricist ZK pitching for his mediocre genes. Madamzee wasn’t impressed, the bureaucrat who was watching these drama keenly intervened “Thum log gatiya log ho thumhari aukat nahi hai” and pushed them out “Chalo niklo yaha se. Chale athe hai ye chahiye wo chahiye”. It was Crude woman, who meanwhile hinged herself against the door, saw the opening “Kya ghatiya log insaan nahi hothe?” but ZK indicated it was time to move on “Onchi dukaan feeka pakwan” “Chalo ji chalo buhut dekke hai Italy wali madamzee ko”. Crude woman said “Hum bhi ja chuke Italy kayi bar. Arre buhuth dekke hai, apna tewar hame math dikao”. It is the same person who a year back was doing “Mamamia gratzi gratzi”, ZK was seen rolling on her feet, in a heightened moment of pseudo secularism. You know the ship is sinking by the stampede of the rats. Clearly congress is out you can see that in the change of strategy of ZK& Co. They are sniffing into BJP, having sucked whatever they could they have now taken their bora bisthara for greener pasture “Hum tho pal pal ke panchi hai” ZK tries his mediocre lyricism and claims that his attack on Modi was to help Sushmazee. The old trick of chiselling the divides for benefits. This is also the right time for international angle for playing saviour to the country.

Watch them how they fix National awards, already they are building the ground. Milkha is been fed some ads and so has gone to the town with his appreciation; culture lafangas (that includes nothing to do but royal Karan Singh so on) have been pocketed. The jury will be fixed which will include the fellow who disgraced the nation with his braying at Commonwealth (if not him his connections, it is an intriguing web of saving the country). It is time to return the favour to ZK’s gene, it is matter of family parampara. It’s going to be a huge victory of secularism in this ‘trying times’!!. It goes without saying that these people have severely undermined propriety and degraded institutions, in two party scene the other side is expected to do their damage as return favour…

        

A devious trap

The problems of India is uniquely Indian and it is difficult for an outsider to understand unless they are sensitive and spent some time to travel and know this vast land. Immensely diverse country where the language, tradition and environment changes quite dramatically, it is full of surprises and shocks, but is sure to overwhelm the senses. It is backpackers dream come true place. There is always some kind of excitement and is rarely disappointing. But there is also one factor that is constant: it is the practice of caste. It gets acute in its sinister presence in small towns and villages while in cities it tends to hide and morph as class concerns, blatant rudeness in public spaces and patronizing value systems that comes from sense of entitlement and ordained place in universe. In intellectual ivory tower it shows its tentacles as uniqueness of trickle down policies and complete lack of sensitivity or need for basic awareness (our great public intellectual liberal posing Amartya Sen, who counts friends among Presidents and PMs –and doesn’t forget to mention it in every conceivable occasions, expresses ignorance and is surprised by its severity.  Clearly bookish knowledge and eking a living in sanitised surroundings, and then playing spokesperson of India’s problems has its limitations). Also castetva forces morphed these as law and order issue for working narration of amazing diversity and ever dripping non violence. In narration controlling market media it is a no show, while they celebrate it as diversity of culture. You go to any place in India, it may look charming, people may be amiable, but it is when you try to understand and know better it is then that the crudeness of the society comes into open. The stench is horrible. From simple discourteous behaviour to degrading segregations to violence, this primitive society seems to be tangled in its own mess. How can such society ever have framework for innovations or refreshing ideas when people are fatalist and insecure. Indian civilization has thrived on mediocrity. Ofcourse there are pockets of excellence but these are taken care by the myth makers as miracle (you can trace the culprits to temple squatters and hang arounds to usurp narration). It is a network that not only perpetuates misery to people but also demean their existence. Despite the diversity of the land this is one overwhelming factors that has cut across the regional, linguistic and even barriers of religions. Some elitist intellectuals see it is a binding factor, as coalesce for collective emancipation and social mobility. A uniquely Indian sign of vibrant democracy, we are told. This intellectual narration gives credence to policy makers assured worldview and subsequent arrogance. It reduces people to blatancy of vote bank and so cheap sops, demeaning the misery further. Sadly under these overwhelming factors the marginalised either gives up or learn to make compromises, haggle for sops or other quick fixes. It may seem caste consciousness for the elitizens, and so they smirk, but the reality is: what is the use of a consciousness where the system has pushed a huge section to the lowest rug for centuries, it is lack of options that leads to cynicism and acceptance as vote bank.     

The only minority in India are the Dalits and the Tribes. This may shock many intellectuals and their posers but the fact remains the most marginalised, I mention marginalised in its all imaginable acute meaning, are the Dalits and the Tribes. I also use Dalit in context of discrimination and exploitation and definitely not as an identity -a devious construct to trap. Dalits arise as a reaction from obnoxiously crude squatter interpretation of Hinduism cut across all barriers of religions. It pervades all egalitarian intention to infect as Christian Dalits, the Muslim Dalits, Sikh Dalits so on. In cities it's class avatar, Dalits are the lower sections –the have not, the underbellies of the society, the outsiders, the unorganised…the caste framework mutate into regressive attitude. Thus the self-congratulatory assertion of being not concerned about caste but nevertheless reflected in the attitude, treatment of servants is just an example.  Right from primary educations to primary health centres there is lack of concern, while mediocre engineering colleges and specialty clinics sprout in every nook and corner. Mediocre here include IITs, the much hyped institution is nowhere in the list of world's best institutes. Even 'toughest entrance' embarrassingly unsuited. So the common people suffer due to apathy. Take for instance the cycle rickshaw, it’s been in big cities for so many decades. Did anyone thought about better design? It’s only a decade back efficient changes were introduced. It needs sensitivity and empathy for these kind of attitude, as also skills to incorporate the needy and connectedness to the sorrounding. I was listening to Anil Gupta (who runs Honeybee as also involved in Innovation Council), a rickshaw puller's daughter introduced innovative changes in the design, it included an option for the passenger to peddle from his seat, so as to help (here Prof Gupta speaking at IHC delhi). To think this way needs a strong sense of empathy and vibrant mind. That is where innovation happens. For this very reason Indian society doesn’t have the capacity for innovation, they are good at universe level speculations and other big intention talk. The other day a young IIT professor was arguing with me about benefits of ‘not eating onions’, he doesn’t even touch onions. While small nation like Taiwan is way ahead in patenting, here people are stuck up with onions!! It need also be pointed out that many poor people can afford to eat only onion with roti, therefore this arrogance and buffoonish thinking should be put in this context. Being an ISCKON member the fellow was also showing how ahead he was compared to mere mortals. I would like to know the Infosys sponsored AkshyaPatra that is run by ISCKON, whether they avoid onion? If yes, why? In that case they should be asked to stop their service; it is creating prejudices among the children. Indeed egg should be part of the diet.  

            There is a sinister attempt at defining minority from the context of religion, which means protecting minorities’ is about protecting Muslims and therefore secular, and thus accruing benefits at the expense of the needy. The elite Muslims who rarely face any discrimination play victims, and therefore opportunist elitizens have saviours and victims among themselves. What a nice setup! The reality is even if they are Muslims, Sikhs, Christians or belonging to any region or speaking any language, the minorities are the Dalits and the Tribes, and they are the one who are discriminated. The communal riots whenever it happens targets this section, the elites rarely face big problems. If you take the statistics of people who get killed during riots, those who lose their belongings, those who had to migrate…it is always the lowest section (mostly the Dalit) within the religion. Changing religion has not changed their conditions. The attacks on Christians are targeted against poorest who are having nothing in common with the wealthy and traditional elite, indeed Christian community is one of the richest in Kerala and rarely face any problems but tend to play the minority card at the expense of real minorities. The attack on Sikhs in 1984 was most vicious in poorer sections like Trilokpuri and Nangloi (though Greater Kailash has substantial Sikhs I don’t think anybody was in danger. Now, who stays in GK and who stays in Trilokpuri?), the reason for apathy while so much vociferous reaction on Gujarat riot is because some elite got killed, one of the rare happening in riots. The reason why the secular brigades are up in arms, meanwhile Sikh pogrom is brushed aside. Dalits get humiliated and killed all the time, throughout the history. If there was no rule of law this would almost be declared as culture. The prominent cases like Khairlanji or Lakshmanpur-bathe case comes to mind, in the latter case the honourable judge found that nobody killed 58 people (which include 27 women and 10 children). It must be aliens! Imagine this happening in South Delhi or to temple squatters in any temple, let’s say Tirupati, you cannot even think this is possible but when it comes to Dalit it is not only plausible but happens almost on daily basis. 

The elitizens are creating the narrations, whether social, historical or cultural, this has become part of our collective conscience. They have created and defined minorities according to their convenience and needs. When I was studying in school, there was popular quiz program that was suddenly taken off the air. The question that invited the ire was “Who is the showboy of the Congress?”, the participant gave the answer Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad, which was judged right! During those tightly controlled days of DD these were refreshing insights. Elite Muslims have always been the showcase of secularism - rightly being called pseudo secularist. In the meanwhile real minorities and needy suffered in this stampede of symbolism. The Congress party is the clear culprit here, the symbolism that worked well during freedom struggle as it got the benefits of feudal nature of society, was sought to be extended. The feudal lords became rallying point for freedom, and so they also became freedom fighters. That they still can garner votes shows primitiveness of the society. Therefore, the anachronisms of Salman Khurshids and others of the ilk, who absolutely have nothing in common with Dalit muslims. In the meanwhile they also blatantly promoted caste cannibals who quite easily took the role of secularist in this framework (obnoxious Mani Shankar Iyer quite understandably calls himself secular fundamentalist). Their national narration of minorities is also adjusted in a manner that it matches and is easily correlates to international, or alteast western narration, this has huge benefits. The consolidation is such that it even caught likes of Amartya Sen off-guard, are we surprised. 

The discrimination of Dalits (and also Tribes) is the discrimination of minority, a cultural and historical minority. All other issues in this context is nothing but vulgar exaggeration. Elitizens have control over the national narration, accordingly they latch on to western narration and try to position and accrue benefits. So the issues of LGBT, gender, AIDS so on though important becomes subservient and almost insignificant to the blatant discrimination and crude dealings of Dalits and caste violence herein. The matter becomes critical because of intentional neglect by the market media (as it doesn’t cater to their audience) as also the powerful people who control the narration. In the overall context of Indian society the issue of LGBT or gender concerns are the expression of the elitizen's hint at discrimination to their ilk which they find disturbing. If discrimination was a concern then caste wouldn’t be there at all!

Small towns or villages are not about romanticised versions of innocence, the reason why Ambedkar had such serious differences with cunning Gandhi on role of village as model for development. A village in India is a cesspool of discriminative culture that attempts sophistication in cities. One wonders whether devious Gandhi would have got such an acceptance as national leader if he was a Dalit? No point speculating, the answer is a resounding no. So caste was a significant contributor in creation of Gandhi as mahatma, and ofcourse Nehru as pandit. It also explains the late resurgence of Ambedkar. There is also romanticisation of small town people when they do well in big cities as if it reflects the egalitarian nature of Indian society, far from it one has go into what social milieu they come from. I was reading Subodh Gupta, the latest Indian artist from small town of Bihar who has made it big using compelling motives that reflects village life. To one question he mentions that the challenge he faced was ‘feeding brahmins’, trying to elaborate his culinary skills. This is our little scoundrel from small town I was referring to.

Recently in a shocking verdict, which was understandably ignored by market media, Supreme Court of India gave Dikshitars (the temple squatters) the right to manage the historic Nataraja temple at Chidambaram. SC points out that the Dikshitars were a religious denomination as per the Article 26 of the Constitution “which guarantees right to establish and maintain institutions for religious purposes.” It’s amazing, who gave the squatters this right? Further on what basis this right is traditional. If it is traditional, that means it is hereditary, this surely is discrimination based on birth against other people. This is a blatant violation of fundamental rights. This blogger would also like to know as to what is the contribution of these temple squatters to the temple, except maybe fleecing hapless devotees. What is the rights of those who constructed the temple, the artisans and other talented people? Further which section of society has been cleaning the drainage of this temple and around for centuries? On what basis fleecing the devotees got precedence over cleaning the drainage (which incidentally the learned judges should know is quite critical). By this logic Dalits should have control to manage the temple. Also talking of richest temple in India, who are the people who control Tirupati temple, and who decided these occupations. I would call this temple, the temple of debauch, they have such insatiable greed for money. Only the corrupt give these kinds of huge donations, crude people who lack empathy and think god would multiply their money in return as favor. What kind of sickness is this? 

If the SC thinks occupation of temple squatters is based on birth then it is also suggesting that doing menial work like cleaning should be assigned to Dalits because that is how job is being assigned. This is undoubtedly violation of human rights, most importantly they even lack basic decency to even suggest this. It is a different matter that all temple squatter belong to particular section while all sweepers belong to another section, all hereditarily assigned. Is that a coincidence? Isn’t this caste discrimination? Is this not violation of minority rights? 

Those who are playing big time seculars should be closely scrutinised, the elitizens have created the narration and having a ball it seems. Take for instance Mani Iyer, what does this surname indicate? Clearly it is reference to his temple squatter tradition status. What did this tradition do to minority (read Dalits)?  They were subjected to heinous discrimination for centuries, and still facing serious problems and discriminations despite affirmative action. What has the framework created by temple squatters done to Indian society? They severely degraded the society and created amazingly self-serving mediocre people. Nazis atrocities against Jews lasted less than a decade but temple squatters atrocities against Indian society lasted for more than 2000years. If Nazi symbols are seen as symbols of fascism and genocide how is caste cannibal symbols signs of culture? I find it baffling. They could easily change their surname to remove caste reference but they will not. This is called ingrained discrimination, even the good intention can be nothing but patronising that nobody needs. This nonsense has gone unchecked for so long because these powerful people have been controlling the national narration and occupying significant positions. Quite amusingly the international community too seem to have been taken in by this narration. This will have to be severely dealt. (picture taken from Anant Patwardhan's Jai Bheem Comrade, that i happen see some time back).

This blogger appeals the international community to declare caste as discrimination. In a uniquely Indian culture understanding caste cannibalism is nothing but crude form of racism. UN should declare this as severe violations of human rights and minority rights.