As I am now quite aware
of ways of Indian mediocre elites, the shock is immense, the edifices are quite
weak. I used to wonder why Indians are given such low value in international
scene, though craving but constantly in denial, concomitantly making wonderful
counter stories of greatness that doesn’t need international validation. These
elites who are generally erstwhile squatters and quite fervently adhere to the exploitative
framework, indeed they have to, since that is the only validation they can
muster and entitled benefits accrued over generation is the sole possession. Then
there is the networking that easily skims over any competitions, therefore
entitled merit. They have conveniently spread across the spectrum of the
society, stampeding where there is money and high moral ground to be taken. Consequently
they are conscience keepers, and without much personal conscience to trouble
their little primitive world they pupate.
What differs from
squatters who masquerade secularism and the right wing (sometime also referred
to as Hindu nationalist by foreign media), is nothing significant. It’s a
clever work that claims modernity through fig leaf of so called secularism.
Secularism (essentially sickularism, the degradation) is about feeding mullahs.
This act gets intense scorn from the right wing; therefore the sickularist
flares it further and claim high moral ground herein from reaction to these
provocations. The framework of sickularism may look egalitarian and compelling
indicator of western modern values, a closer scrutiny will prove the sham. Feeding
mullah becomes an end and all, not only there is a claim on minority protection
but slyly mullah is strengthened to work on the votebank. Emboldened mullah demands
further regression and society gets degraded and communalised. And so emerge
bravehearts and bleeding hearts of liberalism while mullah acquires status of
minority icon. Feeding him becomes final act of sickularist redemption.
It need be noted in this
play act squatter’s framework remains intact and is judiciously safeguarded as
culture. Blatant casteism acquires new meanings, all torchbearers of sickularism
relish these with gusto, indeed it also adds to the compelling narration of sickularism
too as casteism divides Hindus therefore helps mullahs. How wonderful, this
diversity! This wedge is exploited to its crudest possible manner. How much
these cause misery to common people is none of their concern, nor the racism
involved herein. In this primitive conception with feudal and entitled benefits
they work egalitarian values. With such benefits squatters gain browny point
without as much moving their butt an inch and ransack all that could be. Gandhi
was the final con act. Now that he is well established as Mahatma –clearly
proving sickular squatter’s firm control over narration in last many decades,
the furious attempts to establish him as man of peace went unchallenged, or
most likely pushed aside. The lowest sections of society were always vehemently
against Gandhi, the devious Gandhians did drop in to meet ‘god’s people’. Gandhi
had the audacity to claim that he represented all Hindus, wherein he was
clearly not competent for the same nor had the authority but the cunningly
built moral aura worked out the trick. The oppressed sections were stamped out,
so was the narration of protest against Gandhi.
Though the narration of
oppressed section against Gandhi was pushed out in all its characteristic
ferocity from the mainstream discourse another narration against Gandhi was exaggerated
and readied for milking for sickularism sake. This was the right wing squatter narration,
indeed which led to murder of Gandhi. You see, squatters can only acknowledge
squatters, even leaders like Ambedkar didn’t match up (Ambedkar has been quite
a spectacular resurrection in recent times…Guhaji quotes Shourie, and you know
Shourie!…so thrives Ambedkar damning Gandhian heritage). The tradition of
eulogising Godse is not new, what is new is recent attention by liberal squatter
driven media. If Indians can take Gandhi as Mahatma, then they will have to
also tolerate Godse cult, the moral hurt is a simple exaggeration. For common
Indians these are from the same framework. Killing of an individual is
undoubtedly an appalling act but barbaric nonviolence has caused much misery
than all of holocaust manifolds. Gandhi as a mahatma is very much an
exaggeration that has been planted on people, must add quite successfully. Therefore
counter narrations should have its place in democracy. Right wing squatters as
murderers of Gandhi was mainstreamed, therefore by implication against Gandhian
values. Close analysis will point to the fact that Gandhi didn’t differ much
from right wing squatters. They come from the same insular degrading framework
with minor differences in trajectories. Nevertheless Sickular squatters in
Congress milked this to hilt while they carried on their nefarious acts that
included apart from other things blatant nepotism and corruption. It is not a
surprise that BJP has quite easily appropriated Gandhi. That Nehru was man of
scientific mind was taken care by revelation of his desires for astrology and
other squatter preferences, ofcourse being a Panditji! You scratch a bit and
you see they are all similar, even for that matter comrade Namboodripad, whatever
compelling narration of personal tribulations and so on. This blogger want a
full and complete disclosure of fate of Subhash Chandra Bose, that will surely put
the role of India’s freedom fighters in its proper context. Incidentally they
are groovy about Indian mercenaries who fought for imperial forces in WW1 but
nothing of that sort for INA. Bose was pushed out as violent (so was brilliant Bhagat
Singh) while during the same period ‘apostle of peace’ gave the clarion call, ‘sweet
persuasion’, of ‘do or die’ and ensuing violence that led to millions of people
massacred and displaced, it is being sold as independence. It needs amazing dexterity
to weave in story of nonviolence, independence and celebrate colonial Britain’s
mercenaries. And yes the brown sahibs know where the cookies are.
This kind of hypocritical
nonsense is what defines this society, therefore this mediocre and primitive
society shouldn’t be allowed to take high moral grounds in international
forums. They even had the audacity to name nuclear testing on Buddha. That is
how squatters payback, the crudeness of it. Further, Indian elites have
degraded European societies with their worldview that needs closer scrutiny. The
swagger of arrogant sycophant like Mani Shankar Iyerji with glittering beacon
has a long tale to tell. The mullah centred secularism (i.e. sickularism) has also
become a mainstay in Britain. I have few questions here. Can you in the name of
secularism and minority right degrade human rights? Mullah’s view is not the
only understanding of Islam nor Islam the only claimant to minority, indeed nor
minority only about religion. A religion that has so much of primitiveness in
it cannot be allowed to hold humanity on ransom. Though egalitarian views exist
they are being pushed out and a polarising degrading form of Islam is being
sought to be protected as minority right and religious freedom. Furthermore
what are the rights of counterviews in Islamic states? This is needed to put as
necessary balance on understanding the intent of practitioner of religion. Saudi
is arguably the most venom spewing society with crude worldview, how much they
have caused misery in poorer societies with their petrodollar crude form of Islam
is a serious matter. Mullah feeding sickular squatters in India will avoid
these, as its spoils their narrations of wonderful world they create to take away
attention from their stinking beacons and affiliated primitive world.
How can entrenched
patriarchy accepted as human rights? If woman is covering her face as mullah’s
Islam demands then it should be equally applicable to male also. If not, then it is violation of human rights
of woman. In a devious twist (that sickular squatters in India has potential
to) it is being argued as woman’s choice! Yes everyone has choice to wear what
they want. We aren’t talking of individual choices here we are questioning the
system here. And we find that this system is blatantly (crudely) patriarchal,
acquiescing to these will therefore will be violation of human rights. Further,
children brought up under such deviant/ medieval system will find it difficult be
normal or accomodative, the reason why Britain finds itself asking what went
wrong, as multicultural dividends blow themselves up around the world. The
obnoxious practice of polygamy can exist only in mediocre society like India. This
is sickular squatter’s idea of keeping right wing squatters at constant
provocation as they deep chisel liberal benefits from the reactions. Polygamy
can only be allowed if the same system recognises polyandry otherwise it is
biased hence violation of basic rights. In
this case it is blatantly misogynistic, and Islamic countries have time and
again proven it. Such amazing biases thrive to its ludicrous level in primitive
Saudi. This misery is what Indian sickularism seek to proudly strut to the
outside world, indeed some of them even position themselves as spokesperson of
Indian culture! Overwhelming nature of patriarchal and feudal nature of society
has ensconced these.
So sickular squatters who
originate from primitive conception seek to redeem themselves and divert the
attention by feeding mullahs. This sickularism is a beatification process, and
they constantly rub it on the right wing squatters, who are shown to be wanting
on modern values. The reaction from right wing is easily played as threat to egalitarian
worldview. Apart from emboldening racism as culture, it degrades people and
sets in entitled mediocrity, it demeans individuals. All these while sickular
squatters, in a spectacular display of hereditary cunningness, climb higher and
subtler moral ground riding on mullah’s shoulders. Mullah’s worldview therefore
acquires standpoint on minority. It has reached to such a ridiculous level that
even in societies where they claim high social indices like kerala, mullahs fiercely
demand reducing marriage age of girls, so the one who is seen as paedophile in
civilised world becomes culture icon in mullah driven minority protection
scheme. Sickular squatter judiciary also up the ante and tends to show some magnanimity.
Mullah becomes necessary redemption tool for sickular squatters, it is an
amazing conception that keeps all the cruder traditions intact as also privileges
that discriminate while strutting modern world fast lane. The halo is shifted
from temple precincts to greater ideals for humanity. Gandhi turned out to be
the trump card. As expected they exaggerated him, so much so that one wonders
whether the man was real!
One can see clear tracks
of sickular squatters in Britain. Colonial regrets of coloniser morphs into
patronising attitude towards former colonised, this opportunity is effectively
used by Indian elite. Irony being, though Britain has reformed (nesting on
colonial plunder, grand views comes easy in this luxury) Indian elite are just
as primitive. Most South Asian in Britain are product of feudalistic pits, the regressive
pointers from these they hawk as culture. Indians make a special case of it. Their
instinctive craving for white Europeans and immense enthusiasm for monarchical references
are in direct proportion to the disgust for the issues of blacks. You will
rarely see them in any of these protests related to the racism, having firmly aligned
themselves to the whites, they are baffled at being equated with black ‘slaves’.
Innocent and unbridled souls entrenched in squatter’s world see these as an
affront to their high culture and entitled world they are so used to. They therefore
try to emulate the whites as an attempt to get the civilized garb. Almost all the
modern references in India come from this framework, as the squatters had firm
say on the narration. The reason why Indian system suffer from colonial hang-up,
while elite exhibit their brown sahib credential effused in squatter’s
framework in desperately hints at modernity. White Europeans always find expatriate
Indians charming and agreeable lot, albeit sometimes more agreeable than expected
or needed. Some even get titled as ‘Lord’, a natural trajectory for any squatter,
undoubtedly an acknowledgement from god thyself. Though it needs a little tap
from Aunt Elzi, and that is what takes it to newer heights of human conscience.
I am told that Rushdie in his enthusiasm for freedom of expression persuasion tried
to jump the queue. Lord Desaiji’s next milestone is a statue of Gandhi (there
is a serious dearth of it) as a final act of redemption. Sickularism pus is
overflowing and is degrading societies...