Taxes are how the State generates revenue, but many hidden tax tends to impact common
people and take away their hard earned money. VAT (on non luxury/basic items) being the most sinister, it’s
good to see that AAP is trying to make it easy for the common people. Everytime I have breakfast from nearby hotel, I end up paying more as tax. Even
something as innocuous as taking your own money from ATM is being sucked on by
Banks. Market media and its promoters will be extremely vociferous about merit
and world hinged on competition, a sort of self-justification. Economists closely
knit with money bags will chest beat against subsidies, and will make assured
talks with compelling jargons which common people are not expected to
understand but are meant to agree. We are told it is for our own good. Taxes
are increased to augment revenue which is good for the society but clearly it
is not targeted well. Nobody seems to be aware or concerned that there are lots
of Indians particularly in the elite section wallowing in unearned comforts, and
therefore arrogance and wasteful in their dealings. They are insulated from the
hard realities of common people and tend to deal with situations in their
patronising snobbery. What makes it worse is that many of them pontificate and
position themselves as unsolicited guardians, clearly to further their own narrow
ends. It is referred to as positive banding, the beginning of unearned income.
Income that doesn’t
come from one’s calibre or competence or commiserating with hardwork one puts
in becomes unearned and therefore should be taxed heavily. The biggest source
of unearned income is from exploitation of natural resource. Any random fellow with minimal
understanding on digging, use of basic technology (with more money more modern
technology one can use) and material can plunder the mountains and dig up
valley. It is not a rocket science. Ideally State should have access to
judicious exploitation of natural resource on a no profit basis, that is,
earning is spent on public good. But strangely market has taken over and money
bag corporations have queued up. As mentioned the competence required on
digging up land and related matters herein doesn’t require much knowledge,
indeed they work on nepotism and corruption. Semi-literate Aggrawal (of
Vedanta) or Bellary brothers have amply demonstrated that with basic literacy and
minimal skills one can be a millioners or billioners. It’s about strategy to
influence policy makers. The fact that most millioners and billioners in India (as
also in poorer countries) are from sources that is to do with land and its
exploitation clearly points to nepotism and corruption. Only a minimal profit
should be allowed on these exploitations that is essentially public property,
the rest should go to the government. How are private individuals (as
corporates) allowed to earn such huge amount of money from public property? How
did Aggrawal or Adani or Ambani become so rich, what is their source of income?
Clearly they have exploited natural resources, that is, public property that
took billions of years to form and is irreplaceable. These big moneys have
influenced policy makers and made huge amount of money. This money they made is
what we call unearned income. Indeed there needs to be an international law on
these matters. Many moneybags arise from richer countries, even Indians have
converted to NRIs, to exploit resources from poorer countries that has
malleable system. These kinds of unearned income should be stopped or heavily
taxed. Most of natural resources are sold as raw or semi raw materials to
smarter countries like Germany/Japan/South Korea who converts these into
valuable products. Poor countries have people who influence policy makers so
that they can plunder natural resources. These unearned incomes by some
colossally rich people should be checked, should be taxed.
Another important
source of unearned income is from inheritance that truly reflects feudal nature of society,
arising as it is from lack of land reforms or any measure to check these
historical discrepancies that is built on traditional biases. It is undoubtedly
a statement of intend of earlier leaders, indeed many of whom masqueraded as
freedom fighters, some ensconced as pretentious Gandhian, the harbinger of
barbarian nonviolent status quoist. It is a terribly inegalitarian society. A grotesque reality that has made
lives of people miserable, a lop-sidedness that gets reflected in all
social indices. Inheritance forms a major source of unearned income. Indeed the
entrenched incompetence has seen to that these are not discussed; there is a
bogey being raised by cunning manipulators, of destroying family business,
therefore catastrophic for Indian economy. The zombie apocalypse moment is being perpetuated as
Indian strength. How many times we are being fed the hogwash that family businesses and
concerns is what is saving us, as Indians slip into morass of incompetence and inequality.
Well when you have news media being controlled by big family corporates and
lackeys, journalist will only parrot. Journalists are supposed to make buyer
friendly world, and within that they can work out their freedom.
Not
only inheritance in big businesses need be taxed heavily but every inherited
transaction happening should be taxed substantially. Nobody should have
benefits of unearned earning. Every piece of land, every house, every shop, every capital…anything
that is inherited should be taxed heavily. Now these are tangible inheritance,
something easily quantifiable. There is
another aspect of inheritance that mediocre Indian elites suck on and that is
intangible inheritance. Intangible inheritance in primitive society like
India is rather valued, the legacy of ordained fine-tuned to grab money. I have
already discussed about racist surnames that leads to camaraderie and benefits
accrued in the process. It is so entrenched in this godforsaken manipulative
society (in the meanwhile considers itself as some kind of special
people/culture!) that unless international community declare this nation as
racist it will not have an impact, the manipulative elite will scuttle it. The legacy that the progeny accrue from the
profession/name of his parents (mostly father)/family needs to be scrutinised.
These are extension of feudal nature of
society and definitely source of unearned income. In this primitive society
you will observe that in whichever field there is big money, as also where benefits
or competence can be manipulated, you will see progenies masquerading with
legacy doing well. Like most politicians, artists (in particular film industry)…so
on, they tend to create lucrative position for their progenies to squeeze in,
it’s a legacy racket. These are being
projected as the talent of progenies; sometimes they give example of progenies
who have failed to justify their claim. There are two issues here, firstly,
nowadays the scope of manipulation with the help of modern technology is rather fool proof, with control
over medium, necessary clout and money you can create any perception, therefore
easy ride. You can be assured that innovative technology invented abroad today
will be manipulative technology tomorrow with Indian elitizens. Secondly, even
despite these those who fail must be amazingly mediocre or lacked necessary
placement skills. This family name/clout/pride framework that exaggerates progenies
talents is unearned income, they are in the position because of family, and
this should be taxed.
There is a huge
unearned earning that is based on perceptions and exaggerations, what is being
regarded as branding.
The market has created these nonsenses that have eaten into the society. The
sacred act of creating illusion of product to be sold is something that comes natural.
They have ransacked the medium, crudely tapping on every emotion so as to trap
people into buying. Is this what modernity all about? What a disgrace. Extremely
good at gab and selling skills, clever Indians (that is nearest some can come
to competence) have controlled the market media. They expertise in selling what
other countries produce, yes also minor Indian creations like soaps, washing powder
so on. The money here is huge, due to the population of this ever multiplying
people. There is also amazing amount of black money doing the round. The market
therefore degrades the institutions, they put price for everything, crony
capitalism, nepotism and manipulation becomes the norm. Some of these amazingly
limited intellects walk with ease as ‘image gurus’ among powerful politicians (incidentally
powerful politician means highly responsible, meaning people have voted and put
faith on them to genuine work and not manipulate). With the clout gained from
the skills of selling products they park around the power centres and acts as
touts, the one who creates and destroys perceptions. Obviously these are
overpaid people, and the reason they are paid more is because they can
manipulate more. It will be difficult to quantify their earning skills. Cleverness
as earning skills thrives in mediocre societies, Indians therefore do well.
Indeed rich coffers of temples, as people suffer, is a testimony to these. For certain
section creating illusion for common people and exploiting is part of hallowed
tradition.
In
this game of perception that is used to sell products are set of extremely Cooperative
For Money ‘popular’ people, the one with amazing moral dexterity. Market has
chosen and exaggerated movie actors and cricketers. So emerges godforsaken
icons. Both amazingly limited, failing in all close scrutiny (you sometimes
really wonder trying to identify what exactly is the talent?) and earn few
million times than their limited skills of acting or sport skills can ever earn.
In Indian context barring some really rare exceptions one can safely say that
acting in movie (or making movie) doesn’t really require much talent. A random guy
can do it with few days of practice. Further in movie-entertainment, which is a
hugely exaggerated art form, acting is only one minor aspect. But manipulators have exaggerated the
mediocre actors as much as they have done for the cricketers, it is a sinister
act called branding, a concoction to suck in money for no reason. Both
therefore become conduit for manipulating money out of common people. If
Tendulkar earns millions as Coca Cola boy, the question here is where is his
talent in this earning? If hugely exaggerated actors like Shah Rukh (whose
movies becomes hit even before they are released, indeed ZK genes is quite good
at this manipulation) can get millions of rupees of blurting one line in an ad then
what kind of talent is he exhibiting or work is he performing that he is being
gratified with such huge amount of money? Indeed the kind of money most people
cannot make in many lifetime. You may keep wondering what special talent these
people have that commensurate with the money offered. For blurting one line the
mediocre fellow is getting money that would shock most. It’s an amazing racket
of amassing unearned income. The fellow is earning because of his branding. The
question here would be what is the basis of branding? Then you realise it is
the perception, the one that is manipulated and exaggerated. Clearly this
earning is based on perception as also hinged on large population as consumers.
No one can and should be allowed to earn these inflated amounts that has
nothing to do with skills or work. To understand the way these people work one
needs to have closer look at the functioning of IPL (an Indian wonder that in a
way defines this manipulative functioning, that degrades anything and
everything, but fortunately has the potential to destroy cricket), huge amount
of money from nowhere to whosoever. IPL is a definition of functioning and remarkable
degradation of India that the market/sellers are constantly pursuing.
If
an actor or cricketer gets paid for his/her professional skills, exaggerated as
it maybe, it still sounds logical. But in mediocre India cricketers have moved
on to entertainment. They spread their mediocrity as they move. While actors
are everywhere sucking on whatever they could, branding is the rescue act. They
sing, they also become judge after their expiry date to whatever the market
media fancies, some take up causes, fighters of freedom of expression from the
most degraded of surrounding. They even dance –indeed most so called award
ceremonies are about these appalling indulgences, as they workout with rows of gyrating
almost mechanical movements. This hilarity is passed on as artform/dance as ‘actor’/’celebrity’
is involved. People are ready to watch the trash, the actor’s branding
therefore makes him a compelling presence as a dancer, the disgraceful skills
are tolerated as indulgences that we are expected to feel good about. Recently
actor Mohanlal had the audacity to sing at National Games ceremony, clearly
people in Kerala know the limits which our arrogant self-assured fellow missed.
An actor should act, a singer should sing, a writer should write, a scientist
must do research, high jumper must jump high…these are simple rules on which competence
work. One can try other things but shouldn’t exaggerate and try to supersede
genuine talents. The problem here is just because a fellow is an actor or a
cricketer, the market manipulators exaggerate for source of earning. Therefore
he/she starts to sing, dance, bat, judge…and tries to manipulate through and
suck in on easy money. As things are subjective, or made subjective, due to
adoring indulgences they scrape through and so ready for huge money. In the
process they sideline genuine talents. Now you must put these in context of a
nation that has very poor social indices and most people have serious problems.
Could you believe that these nonsenses are happening in a nation that has
millions of people who go without food?
Mohanlal was decent enough to apologise and return
the money for the mediocre fair, the kind of unearned income that could easily
feed children in a school for atleast a decade in this malnourished nation. But
the Congress government was seen magnanimously insisting that he take the money,
probably they are trying to rope in the aging actor. Maybe Mohanlal could take
some lesson from ZK (a veteran in manipulation he degraded Commonwealth
ceremony but came out unscathed because of his market media clout and sycophant leaders who
looked the other way; those were the heydays of sickularism nautanki, and he sucked in big time. However
manipulating national award for his gene had a tragic end. What a resounding
slap that one, not one but two. Ouch it hurts!!). Will Tendulkar apologise for
taking money from Coca cola for reason that has nothing to do with his record
breaking batting skills, indeed there isn’t anything positive about Coca cola.
The clever fellow knows his lick and the clout herein as much as all the
mediocre ‘celebrities’. They can earn easy money and do whatever but these
unearned incomes should be taxed heavily.
Actors
have also start to play cricket that attracts huge money, some in the
entertainment industry have even downgraded cricket (a sport that is least
athletic to start with) and goes by the name box cricket. They can carry on
with the racket but unearned income should be severely taxed. These huge
unearned earnings of actors and cricketers that has nothing to do with their
talent (least as they maybe) but about perceptions and exaggerations, therefore
should be heavily taxed. This kind of manipulation and easy money for some
because of clever placement must be scrutinised. This is crony capitalism,
unethical in any form.
Further,
these kinds of unearned income create a system that thrives on irresponsible
behaviour and crass spending. When most
in elite are moneyed for the reason that cannot be classified as competence or
talents or work then they don’t particularly value things. They therefore
create huge carbon footprint from their lifestyle. This degrades the environment
as also create further livelihood challenges for the impoverished majority. It’s
clear from the inane car and other luxury product ads that in the last few
years some section are earning lots of money for no reason. They are so stupid
that the car manufactures believes that they will decide to spend huge amount
by looking at some dumb ads. It’s a statement on calibre of people earning huge
amount of money, they themselves don’t know the reason. It probably is why ritual based religious indulgences and superstitions are coming back
in all its vigour among the moneyed section. Education doesn’t seem to have any
impact where providence and alignment of stars is what matters. What is there
to read or learn when the fellow throwing the ball is earning in millions, if
he was a good sportsperson then it can be partly be justified. Look at the
money earned by ‘sportsman’ named Yuvraj Singh who has well past his prime,
truly Babaji’s blessing. Indeed the followers of Babas themselves form a strong
mutually supporting clique. At one time if you were a follower of charlatan at Puttaparthi
you could easily be in contact with the highest echelons of power, bureaucrats,
the politicians…almost all the elite. The redemption was achieved by donating
part of their unearned income/fortune to the Baba. Indeed temples like
Tirupathi are open 24x7 on this kind of donations. Unearned income could be
shared with god, it makes it guilt free!! Squatters have unique ability to tap
in. Srinivasan is an incredible case study.
Some
of the actors point to their genes as legacy (for their body ofcourse, Khan claims
on his pathan origin!...indeed dear fellow we have all evolved from monkey). Yes
with limited talent and huge unearned money coming their way they need to have
reasons for this amazing irony, unfortunately they really don’t know where
racism begins or where prejudices thrive and sensibilities end. It is shocking how
much things are degraded. Not a surprise
since trivial people with unearned income will only trivialise things. The buying friendly investment jubilant society
cannot be expected to be different.