Fundamentalists are there in every religion and so are criminals but none have better chance of making it big except among Muslims. And when it comes to fundamentalism in “islam” the world goes so quaint. It is about mutual patting and hugging session. Oppressive traditions are debatable. It also comes out wonderful idea on choice and happiness. Is it about appeasement? Nah it is about money.
The media doesn’t want to loose its audience (poor people are just running some business), the politicians want vote. So springs up worms in all forms. Media and ‘secular politicians’ like to tickle muslim-fundamentalists-only. It is about numbers. Till recently I didn’t think on these lines but with mullah's worldview getting credence the rules are changing. This brings us to the issue of why are, lets say, Hindu fundamentalists treated so badly? Sometimes even mocked. World is changing for worse. So now it is very important to understand why communal riots happen in an entirely different perspective. If empathy and concern should be seen from ‘Muslim’ fundamentalist angle then it is also very important to understand ‘Hindu’ fundamentalist’s angle. What is beautiful about Hinduism is turning out to be its weakness. It is about fundamentalism and crudeness that matters.
It is now important to understand something about ‘Hindu’ fundamentalism. How much of minority deviance tolerance is responsible for communal riots in India particularly in Gujarat need be studied?. Further Narender Modi’s cause and effect theory is quite a valid argument in this context. When they cannot have a temple in Saudi (lets say Mecca) or Rome then why would Hindus allow a mosque in what many in Hindus consider as holy city whether Ayodhya or Benaras. Add to this the historical perspective of temple destructions. They are within their right to take actions and rather than criticizing we need to understand them. If Muslim fundamentalists needs understanding so should Hindu fundamentalists. When ‘Hindu’ girls can walk in complete freedom and are seduced by some mullah’s son (because obviously she is an object-open meat or sweet is the word doing the round in mullah’s worldview) while vice versa is impossible since they are packed in veil (for the very same reason) then it is understandable why Bajrang dal gets angry (my suggestion is they need to be more organized and vicious). Further a comprehensive study need to undertaken as to who are the people who mostly indulge in eve teasing and rape. When women are considered ‘open meat’ and ‘sweet’ waiting to be grabbed, when ‘Hindu’ women have no particular restrictions (even there is none there is a space of change) mullah’s breed must be in tremendous testosterone pressure. Rape mindset is part of God’s will. Hindu zealots’ lynching a mullah’s breed for marrying a ‘Hindu’ and converting is ‘cause and effect’. And yes it does sound credible.
How many ‘Muslim’ women have married ‘Hindu’ men and changed their religion?. I say that sounds unsecular!!!. While Hindu women marrying Muslim men and converting religion is not uncommon. It is also seen as beacon of secularism in some circle. Infact in the contemporary world they have a better chance of making it. Even after they are divorced they carry the surname, there is huge spin off here (take the example of a woman who goes by the Suhasini Ali, she also positions herself as some kind of feminist. No it is not a joke!!). A slave columnist writes that Munnabhai should focus on the issue of dowry in his next movie. Wow. Till recently I thought there was something humanist about these argument but with their not so subtle nod to mullah breed it is clear that they working on their audience. Slave can follow only the master’s orders. What we now need to focus is why is Dowry banned??. Dowry or Kanyadan is part of Hindu way of life. Murder is law and order problem. If veil is acceptable so should dowry as also casteism. This majority bashing has become a career move for many. You cannot say Muslim stink is acceptable and Hindu stink not. That is a very strange notion. Mullahs are not minority infact in globalised world they are the biggest threat after bush and nuclear bombs.
So the psyche of Hindu fundamentalist needs to be understood and yes appreciated. Why they attack inter religious marriage and particularly conversion need to be studied and debated….and finally empathized. Some say India is a beacon of secularism. Some crude joke this one. Whatever tolerance exist in this society has more to do with most Hindus mindset of adjusting with things and surrounding, as also poverty has kept them occupied. If India had majority of Muslims then we can very well guess how much damage mullahs would have done. Further the anger which is exhibited in the form of pogroms and other forms of hatred need be understood. If international community can spend more time and empathize with mullah’s breed who blow up people and places Then it should be extended to fundamentals of other communities like say intelligent designer experts. Further if it is about freedom of expression then why was Muhammad cartoons not published in India or London (is it about fear, loosing business…taking an easy way out). Some one mentioned Muhammad cartoons were indecent, if that is so then the same people need to say what is decent about veil. Crudeness is not better than decent. Also why are the ‘Muslim community’ not seen protesting against lack of freedom and oppression in Saudi or other heinous crime committed in the name of religion in Arab world. Clearly Mullahs are only trying to spread themselves, and democracy is the best alibi where they are minority. They do talk of freedom of choice and make correct noises to suit the media. Spend some time with them you will know that they are the crudest people in almost all the cases (with very rare exceptions …which is a surprise). It is extremely heartening to know that mainstream in West is awakening to this danger. Veil issue being brought out by Jack Straw need be appreciated (yes we can criticize their foreign policy). Britain is a free country and nobody can dictate terms on what its politicians should say, particularly not the mullahs. Loony left is now focusing on minority vote having been dumped by ‘workers’ (vice versa truer). Comrade Mullah is a distinct possibility!!. Even though Saudi has so much money we don’t see any informative programs or activities from that side. The other day I happen to know about pistol shrimps- did you they make the loudest noise in the world!! About a travelogue to Buenos Aires and also about Nanotechnology….For mullahs these world don’t exist. They live in medieval insulated world, a kind of dark ages of Christians. Their contribution is only in the form of nuisance (true in other religion but we can discuss with them). The issue of global warming, biodiversity loss and so on is our problem which Mullah (as also white supremacist in Midwest) has nothing to do with. In their world it is god’s wish. These people are drag on human race. Main aim being creating more insular and intolerant world (the only tolerance being we need accept their depraved world view!!).
I guess it is important that Hindu fundamentalists get cruder and aggressive and organize more then only they have a chance. In this context Shiv sena splitting is a bad news. Hopefully we will see more regressive section of Hindu fundamentalist coming into power in future. This is important for level playing field. I personally find some dongi sadhu raj much more appealing than some mullah raj or some carefully disheveled loony left. With media and politicians more interested in numbers the harassed common people in ‘Hindu community’ have zealots to look forward to. And believe me if this society don’t have more vicious and organized ‘Hindu’ Right the mullahs will continue to have free run under the garb of democracy and yes secularism. When law against Domestic violence has come into effect Mullahs are allowed more than one wife, isn’t that the worst form of violence??. Obviously Mullahs in India are quite ecstatic group…all gods graces no doubt. India probably is the only country in the world where mullah polygamy is part of heritage!!!. Peace be on his name!!. Yep let’s feed the scoundrels without any distinctions.
A disclaimer: not that this really matters but when I say mullahs it is intolerant breed which has nothing to do with common Muslims who themselves are victim of these people. Further this disclaimer is not an attempt to be a secular and score brownie points. First I am not into politics; second I am not trying to please my audience like the slave masters in media for small profit.
