The Karnataka government’s intention to ban beef in the state is a regressive move. Government doesn’t have any business to decide what anyone eat or shouldn’t eat. They would do well to focus on issues of hygiene standards, spurious ingredients and so on. Beef is part of diet of many people, it is a source of cheap protein in many families. Further stray cattle lead to overgrazing and therefore detrimental to ecology. This law is discriminatory, and communal in it’s intend. The basis of ban itself is questionable, invoking Hinduism doesn’t hold much logic. Cows are revered animals in many rural homes is beyond doubt and have special place in the hearts of many Indians (frankly most Indians in small villages tend to love all animals around…I recall having specific names for each hen!!. In cities though these are broilers, the disconnect is astounding). It is more of utilitarian tradition that has acquired religious connotations Even if it is mentioned in religious texts or there are strictures against doesn’t make it a case for ban since it intrudes into rights of other communities. Many East Asian societies eat dogs, which is considered repulsive by West. Are dog meat banned in West?. Adjustments will have to be made in multicultural and multi religious societies. What should be part of diet is individual choice provided these don’t
This blogger strongly feels that butcher shops need to follow strict hygiene standards and social rules, exposed meat shouldn’t be allowed as also the way these are transported should be humane. Laws on these matters should take into consideration sensibilities of vegetarians (who are in majority)