We are aware of tardy Indian judicial
system that is known for pomp and grandeur in all its attempt to replicate
feudal arrogant ways carefully trying to showcase modern values but never quite
able to reach these higher goals because of their limited proficiency and
understanding of life and indeed justice. They haven’t really understood, with their
limited little entitled mind, the reason for power being placed on them and
immense significance of justice in democracy. These arrogant gnats are parasites of their law books without having ever understood the fine lines, and is quite clear will
ever. Meanwhile as they eke out their grandness, and a burden to common people, they also have godforsaken expertise views and opinions on matter that sometimes is too shocking to common sense.
It is expected that they give their verdict and move on, but no, these will disgrace
with their unsolicited opinion as if they have the god given right to speak and
elaborate to us common people. This blogger sometimes wonder whether they ever understand the onerous expectation on them in what is essentially an
unfair and unjust society, and are sometimes only beacons of hope for more than billion people.
Then there are legal luminaries mostly
scums and low lives who have understood the nuances of how to maximise and extricate
from the system, and have networked everything to their cosy advantage, so much
so that one of the most tardiest judicial system has produced many millionaires
and powerful people who even with desultory ease slip into branches of
executive, some even end up as ever powerful ministers. That there is a
significant conflict of interest, nepotism and cronyism never miss the
observation. It is indeed amazing and unique that most of so called freedom
fighters were lawyers, who were quite adept in semantics and traditional chicanery
of word jugglery, mostly devoid of passion or intent that worked it. They played
it safe, hence it was but transfer of power without much democratic intention,
that is reflected in the laws and machinery that delivers these. It is this
legacy, and indeed a huge burden, that we carry all the time. These arrogant little
mediocre minds have very high estimate of themselves therefore are also very
concerned about propriety and have contempt as weapon, a horrible joke in bleak
and distressing society that we live in, something that is in the garb of justice
and freedom but is cleverly posited to showcase their entitled worldly ways as
blessed souls.
This incident at SC the other day will
enlighten on the ways these low lives eke their living and pass their time as
cosy coterie dispensing justice to more than billion people. Wonder at their amazing
level of intellect and thoughts that consume their mind. Also note the legal luminary
Ms Kamini Jaiswal, who is persistently jockeying for bigger deal, fervently networking the influence in TV studios and social circuits, also conveniently
positioning for women’s emancipation as the occasion demands (as someone in US
said ‘I don’t vote with my vagina’, in Indian context with these self-serving
women this is so very true. Women’s emancipation doesn’t come through these
high end vaginas. Get that CrudeWoman?). She is seen in her sycophantic best mylording
the judge. Now Gogoi is the judge (mind it I don’t even use ‘Mister’, how sacrilegious,
and has the possibility to unhinge all of judiciary!! Such fragile egoistic people,
it is surely the primitive nature of society that produces these) here meant to dispense
justice but ends up dispensing contempt with alacrity of slithery black mamba on prowl. To
start with, in a civilised society a fellow with caste reference will not
even come anywhere near any position in judiciary. But then this is primitive
India and this glint in diversity shone to awe the world (atleast the monarchy
sucking mullah feeding british elite, who never have had any skin in any game, already think this is a miracle, and that probably is self justifying for effete Indian elite! Wherever hereditary based entitlements and segregationist mindset congregate they hug and promptly dig their tent). The fellow
emerging out of sanctum showcases his higher bearing by underlining paragraphs
(surely mylord has spent some precious hours through the night doing that! Is Boost the secret of thy energy?!),
and you will note what he is attentive to -and the intention of this fellow in
the garb of judge, meanwhile also note Mr Katju (our essential proverbial bull in judicial chinashop) was prepared for the case in
right earnest and argument but was left gaping. Hence the intention was to humiliate and pleasure that ensues and spreads across this debauched coterie as incident turn into event and then to back thumping raconteur's anecdote served with gourmet delight.
…Then Justice Gogoi handed over the photocopies of the
blog to Rohatgi and asked him to read them and give his opinion on the underlined portions. The report said that
“as soon as Justice Katju took a cursory glance at them, Justice Gogoi asked
him what he had to say” to which Justice Katju replied: “This is a free
country. I have a right to say what I want.”
Rohatgi then told
the court that the contents of the blog were “scandalous”. At this,
Justice Gogoi said, “Well, we are issuing contempt notice against Justice
Katju.”
…While the former Supreme Court judge is known for his outspoken
and bold nature, advocate Kamini Jaiswal
criticised his demeanour in this case. “Have you read his blog. See the
language. There is a method of speaking. Whatever he said was scandalous to the
whole court. He has not committed contempt of one person, he has committed
contempt of the court. And being a retired judge of the Supreme Court, the
least you can do is respect the institution that has given him his own position
in life. Today, he is Katju because he was a judge of the Supreme Court. Who
would know Katju otherwise?” she remarked.
Noting that today the bench had
called Katju “to hear him out on his views in which he said the court is wrong
and on the question of reviewing that judgment”, she said even today he
“committed contempt while he was there”.
On what was wrong with Katju’s conduct,
she asserted: “You don’t address a judge
as Mr. Gogoi. He was not attending a dinner at Justice Gogoi’s. He was
addressing a judge. You are addressing a bench. You are not addressing a bosom
pal. You should know how to respect the court. You will only get as much
respect as you will give.” (courtesy thewire.in)
The focus therefore is on ‘demeanour’ (what
the fuck?) and language. Well at the end of the day when the dust does settle in
lutyen’s delhi it is about the size of chair. Uski chair meri chair se badi kaise? That surely is another reason
for contempt mylord! Such debauched people. This would have been a joke if not for
horrendous reality of this society. It is also a common knowledge that under filmiest
of occasions lawyers are known to turn hooligans, as they spent most of their time
exploiting distressed and hapless people seeking justice (ditto what you see in
Haridwar. Demeanour in ritual is an important matter). It, as always, is reduced
to ego clash, a defining moment in the life of mediocre people in entitled
world, and indeed humbleness is the only talent and redeeming aspect of this
godforsaken coterie wallowing in debauchery. It is such a disgrace.
Post script: So what with Soumya rape and murder case. So what....it can wait. Mylord is sorting contempt.
