This fellow here is a right example
of what is defined as “superficially black”, indeed most ‘ethnic faces’ in British cabinet for last many years were superficially black. What Tony Blair’s
party (that attacked Iraq and was responsible for many deaths and mayhem thereafter)
aka Labour party must realize is that we are not living in 19th
century wherein ‘black’ had only one meaning devoid of any context -not
even human, and that of skin colour. World has evolved since so has the word ‘black’,
now the word, apart from ofcourse the unfortunate reference to skin colour hence
racism, has a political and social context too. What it essentially means is that Kwarteng although he is black -hence all the historical context of racism/slavery attached against it, his evolution into social political has been such that his skin colour identity has become rather superficial. He is a neoliberal elite in a powerful position, and has consistently been immune to social reality of common people or the precarious state of environment. His education has failed him. Hence he is superficially black. Not at all difficult to understand. And this bunch who don’t even
understand basic semantics of discourse or contexts of reality we live in are
providing the political alternative in Britain. They want to keep common people ossified
and controlled within the binary narration that help their manipulation for
power. How can people ever trust these who pose as liberal progressives and an alternative
to buffoonery show in Britain? These polarizing binaries is a significant reason
why the world is in such a sorry state. While market media do ‘balancing act’ i.e.
both sideism, to give credibility to manipulations and fake narrations. Ossified
semantics, narrow meanings, becomes main mode of controlling narration to keep it tethered to past
that has no value or connection with challenges common people face, indeed it’s
a distraction, a criminal negligence, a sadist game.
