Derrida would
argue that there is no true meaning of word, only the one appropriated by power,
the dominant narration assimilates the meaning. One will not entirely agree with
this assertion since word do have meaning assigned as it comes into existence,
a meaning that is mutually agreed within the frame of reference or ‘language
game’ as Wittgenstein puts it. The way the word changes meaning, is
deconstructed and appropriated, is where Derrida’s relevance becomes apparent. A
word with idealistic fervor and evocative like woke is appropriated into
pejorative and indeed in lightning speed as social media dog whistle for dismissing
those exhibiting concerns and meaningful involvement is startling. Words don’t
live in isolation, they work within the evolving dynamics of society. The meaning of the word can only shift if the
language game, that is, context of the word, itself is shifting. You cannot change
the meaning of the word if the context isn’t favorable. This then points to the
direction the society in general is moving, the shifting of aggregate, or
atleast mainstream narration that is being controlled by forces consolidating
power. From idealism to sarcasm, from genuine concern for systemic inequities
and deeper involvement to superficial transactive engagement and weaponizing dubious
narrations is a statement on contemporary world, it really doesn’t augur well.
The movement of meaning is consolidation of intent.
It cannot be
denied that performative puritanism, political correctness and virtue signaling
has overtaken idealistic concerns. Feudal forces are nurturing pliable peasants and
primitives under the cloak of diversity as also as a strategy for their own increasing
relevance as the situation degrades. Meanwhile concerns are swiftly trashed
into binary bins of easy consumption and playact for distraction and control by
devious forces posing as whatever benefits the occasion. Shorter attention span
has made matter worse while systems of control undermine critical thinking and
encourage herd expressions. Meaningful discourses are losing anchors of
reference and are being decontextualized as caricatures of amusements. This is
problematic. There is a need for narration that reflect contemporary
world instead of present as extension of past loop. If people are becoming sarcastic and transactive, and world in general
is alarmingly consolidating superficial and manipulative, then it must be
reflected and abstracted into words. Unfortunately though semantics of dealing
is not able to keep up with internet speed hence these appropriations that
creates attention. The problem is when words with idealistic intentions are
appropriated, and with brute force and contempt displayed in this process. Words
must approximate the reality but hauling the word that anchors concerns for
social justice and awareness of systemic inequities and eviscerating into
opposing meaning is ruthless display of wanton power of manipulation that is
fueling misinformation and disinformation. Sarcasm as a mainstay of discourse
has dire consequence.
(picture herein
is AI generated, refined after few prompts)