Judiciary is essential part of
democracy, and is indeed the lynchpin of justice for people. In a degraded
primitive society like India with horrendous inequity nurtured and
sustained by despicable traditions that pupated in moral vacuums these ideas of
justice becomes critical. It is well known how inequity pervades indian society, and a complete lack of sensitivity and empathy on these matters baffles.
All statistics and study clearly shows these amazing levels of disparities, as fattened
side showcase cruder ways usurping benefits without any shade of any known
competence. Indians therefore remains an overwhelmingly mediocre society that
cannibalises itself meanwhile carries exaggerated estimates of its prowess.
There is always an attempt to showcase
its blessedness, sometimes with surfeit claims of spiritual pout, mahatmas and
pundits to awestruck the world, in mundane realities it is about breaking
records, guinness or whatever is nearest possible to firmly establish the
blessedness. Like domesticated species they are adept to follow, the fatalistic
worldview is a constant guide, meanwhile they pit their limited mental calibre
into esoterical matters to showcase their higher bearings and blessing. Over
the centuries the muck accumulated as Indian philosophy, an embarrassment, a
clever set of word play with utmost ease, confidence that surely couldn’t hide
any competence. They strode the earth with light footed gaiety of self-assuredness
with ever higher reaches of humility. Without any known competence and basic
intelligence humbleness became a marker of higher bearings which easily
camouflaged sycophancy to power and other ethical degradations. Fatalist
outlooks for the blind followers and with heightened sense of dispenser of justice
–god’s representations, judiciary became a favoured shift from putrefying sanctum.
It is amazing that even in the bleakest of tragedies like colonialism (which
ofcourse is much benign compared to casteism) some were able to choose career
and pursue it with much vigour without even a thought of its relevance or
context. It is the same reason that ethical bound and compassionate souls like
Bhagat Singh or Azad were not enamored by these clever options and went ahead
with their souls in right place. They paid the ultimate prize and have pride of place in the
hearts of common people while lawyers turned clever manipulators therefore became
negotiators for power, this deceitful tradition carries on even now. The worst
of judicial system, that is so lackadaisical and tardy, has produced most of
luminaires, ministers, and millionaires for this godforsaken society.
Furthermore it has nurtured the unethical traditions and debauched ways, and
has been the source of regressive consolidation, despite yeoman’s efforts by considerate souls over centuries.
Feudal caste debauchery were mostly in the periphery of Indian tradition, gaining significance only through squatting
in sanctum and acquiescing to power, prescribing reasons for fatalism,
ensnaring people in their frailties, all emanating from mediocre minds furiously
working in its own limitations. These regressive cannibalistic traditions were
thoroughly rejected by enlightened souls over the centuries -the best Indian
traditions and philosophy find expression in these. Meanwhile squatters sought
power and credence by comforting and guiding effete kings into pits of
fatalisms, primitive ways and incompetence. With Indian elite wallowing in
their own muck nothing remarkable was expected as they were overwhelmed in
their deceitful ways. It is only after so called independence that these
caste feudals finally had absolute control. Since then there has been regressive
consolidation and usurping of egalitarian traditions into caste folds and
attempts to normalize heinous regressive ways and traditions. Gandhi was a major
instrument in this degradation.
If a high court judge has
demented and ridiculous views on cows and peacocks like for instance “cow is
the only living being which intakes oxygen and emits oxygen and the animal is
hospital in itself”, and this is only one of the gems there are paragraphs of
‘scientific’ and ‘logical’ explanation from this buffoon. There should be ideally an enquiry set up, all his verdicts and observations must be scrutinized and
expunged. The fellow is mentally unfit to hold any responsible position
whatsoever, so how did he end up as a Judge in a HC? Pity this society. And don’t
be surprised there are many like him wearing different garbs and profiles with fantastic
views about themselves and world around them. They have been nurtured and
sustained all these decades by the degraded system that has severely eviscerated
the society and dehumanized people. The reason why it is showing some signs of
movement and hints of modernity is due to technological innovation emerging
from outside world otherwise this is a primitive society constantly scrapping
the bottom.
The vehemence with which some are
classified as right wing (hindutva) is to somehow cleave a life simulating
egalitarian narration. Positing as centralist liberal is a ploy to bulldoze
into western narration and squeeze benefits. There are no liberal forces in Indian
context, atleast not in mainstream, they have been pushed into subaltern
narration after independence. Caste feudal fed and nurtured under the
tutelage of mahatmas and pundits have high estimate as kindred souls. Castetva
forces cannot claim, and will not be allowed, to be classified as liberal. The
mask doesn’t fit. Caste references that they carry as identity is good way
to start this scrutiny, these shouldn’t allowed in any civilised society and
must be seen with contempt as confederate signs or nazi symbols. It is quite startling that these primitives
have quite cleverly sneaked into civilized frame and are now posing as liberals,
some even as spiritual masters of the world. Buffoons like Sharma (the HC
Judge) are nurtured by the same framework; the self-assured arrogance is part
of the narration. It’s the degree of revelation in public that distinguish; while hindutva forces go all the way out, indeed as a reaction to decades of
neglect, castetva forces (essentially a subset to hindutva forces but have
cleverly cleaved for themselves with support from state machinery) masquerading
as liberals keep the degradation hidden in private space, but nurture it
viciously meanwhile manipulated and successfully occupied the center space in
designer cloths, emulating western sophistication and high intentions. So, caste discrimination is to be shunned
while caste can be celebrated is how it is being desperately worked out while the
high moral ground slips under the feet. Race is objective reality, people
look different, hence prejudices are unfortunately likely and not to be racist is an effort,
and is an evolution towards better world. But caste is not an objective reality
hence to remove caste discrimination without ‘annihilating’ caste is how
hypocrisy gets defined. Dalit is not a reality but created construct, an
offshoot of caste, that is nurtured by effete Indian elite to patronize and
showcase to the world as kindred souls, and match it with ‘blacks’ hence position themselves as liberals. Amazing chicanery. The bluff is called. These people must be
dealt sternly, with all revulsion one can muster. Like racism caste is an assault on humanity.
The caste cannibal feudal blissful in entitled life and blessings, dispensing patronages and networking
camaraderie, curdled in insular world have fantastic view of world and their
special place. Unfortunately the world doesn’t see it that way. Nevertheless
they gallantly propose all solutions to all the problems of the world. A “spiritual”
guru, laughable as they are trying to emulate Zen entrenched in primitive
worldview, even claims that he could change the world if world leaders listen
to him! And the journalist slaves lap it up as another sign of miracle that
India is!! There is another blessed one who has been desperately chasing Nobel,
while in his arrogance and crassness forgets basic matters of environment. Market
too promotes their own nominees to showcase enlightened bearings, the result is
always hilarious. Take this example of fellow named Devadutt Patnaik, who is
promoted by caste feudal moneybags -multiplying with state support over the
decades, treading liberal and showcasing higher intents (like honourable
Sharma, but much nuanced in public). This fellow as predicted carries the
halo and pout of problem solver of the world, that god has blessed and anointed
with ancient Indian wisdom, hence has a special secured place. He
writes “Hindu ideas challenge all
conventional dominant notions of justice and equality, confounding the Western
scholar, who takes refuge in reducing Hinduism to casteism, feudalism and
brahminism. The thought that distinguishes Indian philosophy is the idea of
infinity. The world is infinite. So the truth is infinite”. So now you can
tick all the boxes here of elevated selves, unique, that baffles “confounds”
the world, then with a clever sleight negate scrutiny by accusing of “refuge in reducing”(?!!)
and lastly usual massive morning dump of “infinite” philosophy. Truth therefore ladies and
gentleman is infinite. I guess, the same logic could be applied to lie. Lie is
also infinite!! Now read him further as he carefully works his degradation meanwhile
patronizing other religions, hinting at amazing tolerance that scraps the bottom
of the pit “The same Quran can be read
differently in different part of the world, and Wahhabism is just one form of
Islam that seeks to dominate. And simply because it seeks to dominate does not
make it valid or invalid. It needs to exist in relationship with other views of
Islam. Just as casteist Hinduism will always exist but will be contained by
other forms of Hinduism that are agnostic about caste”. Yes the usual
semantics and word jugglery that trickster use to startle, and many in West do
get mesmerized by these. The charming world between “valid or invalid” is where these primitives lynch in their degraded
mind. Careful scrutiny will show that this is an attempt at obfuscation, to
muddy the water, justification of feeble and lazy, nevertheless coat it in high
sounding philosophy and a benign satisfaction as overseer of world, the
blessedness. Wahhabism is not “just one
form of Islam” if one is aware of contemporary reality and the havoc it has
created. Casteism “will always exist but
will be contained” Really? How clever, and is it being contained? The
degraded fellow himself is living example of caste, the audacity is amazing.
The worst is to come, the fellow elaborates with characteristic confidence,
that surely has no hint of basic awareness, a common symptom of entitled world
“It is not about either/or in the new
world order. It is about and. If we want to believe in diverse world, we have
to make room for diversity, and diverse views. Keeping alternate views out of
universities, or gagging them in press, is certainly not the way forward”.
We do understand ‘and’ and we do know about ‘diversity’ but not the degradation
in the name of diversity that seeks to dehumanise and debase reality. Diversity
is a beautiful world that primitives like these are incapacitated to even comprehend,
coming as he is from cannibalism driven worldview. He even has the audacity to
suggest that “keeping alternate views out of universities, or gagging them is
certainly not the way forward”…so by ‘alternate views’ he means “wahhabism”
“casteism” or even racism, extending the logic . The fellow needs to understand
that these are not views, and that it will not be taken without challenging, otherwise
it means acquiescing to discriminatory ways. Yes it will be taught in
universities not as an ‘alternative’ as the primitive is suggesting but with
awareness of its historical context and humanitarian values. The fellow is a
clear case of exaggerated soul negotiating his entitlement with mediocre
outcome, they have the habit of lackadaisical superficial ways to obfuscate
their lack of competence or understanding. The more they spread, more
degradation they create.
Another one, this an economist,
and like lawyers these are another species of bullshitters that effete Indian
elite are besotted to. Arvind Subramanian is sophistication personified the
kind that lutyens Delhi has much use of. On Universal Basic Income he had to
tag it to Gandhi, clearly showing his intention for higher ambition,
supplicating to Gandhi is short cut elevators for many around power centers. A
careful look will make it clear that Gandhi would have never agreed on UBI,
it’s not in his basic character to be appreciative of tribulation of common
people trapped in inhuman frames; he may have had grand views to awe struck the
world but the Janus face hides the hometruth. The fellow was a sucker to
physical work (physical work is next to godliness it seems, and this nonsense
is actively spread by religion/market to create unthinking slaves of humans),
charkha –spinning wheel, being symbolic to his worldview, ah the charm of
rotating and repeating for hours and hours. Only someone who doesn’t value what
is to be alive, not connected to life and living, will appreciate these (I
recall about late polish president Lech Walesa who went back to tightening
screws, the job he initially held. I sure recall reading the quote section in
Time magazine at American consulate). Clearly he was useful for caste cannibals positioning to capture power from British. Fellow like Gandhi would not
have agreed on giving money without physical effort, however demeaning and
degrading the job is as the charkha
symbolized. Mr.Subramanian is being quoted here not to understand nuances or
grander worldview from spinning charkha
but for the reason that he says “Gandhiji
the moralist would not say you shouldn’t give uncompensated rewards, Gandhiji
the baniya would say you should be fiscally conservative..” The baniya?
Isn’t that a caste slur? And yes if our man is a casteist then what would “chamar’s”
worldview be like? What would be “pariah’s” views be like? Clearly our caste cannibal fellow in the effort to charm the power structure didn’t think about the
consequence of his debased uttering. It’s a common happening among Indian
economists and lawyers, they can bullshit whatever without any thoughts on
consequences, because it doesn’t matter when “truth is infinite”!
Meanwhile after French elections
the effete here are fashioning for centrist liberal, Pawan Verma (who apart from other stellar sycophantic attributes also expertise in the pronunciation of lingerie) is first out
of block. Previously our man was piously pitching for indianisation through
Sanskrit and even wonders why there aren’t roads named on Krishnadevaraya. One
very well knows the degraded context of Sanskrit in Indian history, as also
amazingly mediocre works in this language. As for Krishnadevaraya, the temple
building Hindu king, he is just a footnote in Indian history, indeed all kings are, except for some
with grand hindu revivalist agenda. A newspaper column had this to relate “The brainwave of the land’s Prime Minister
and his advisors to withdraw a major amount of currency from circulation as
legal tender, ostensibly to change black money into white prompts one to
recollect an episode being retold about witty jester Tenali Rama in the court
of Krishnadevaraya. Briefly the storyline is: ‘The king’s personal barber having come to king’s private chamber to
give him a shave found him asleep. However, being duty conscious, he braved and
shaved the royalty successfully without waking him up. The king, who was
surprised and happy on learning about barber’s professional excellence sent for
him and granted him a wish which was granted namely, the barber’s elevation
into an upper caste. Having come to know about outrageous act of the king,
Tenali Rama took his pet dog, black one at that, to the riverside and started
soaking it in water and repeatedly scrubbing it hard. The king was curious and
sought to know Rama’s act, only to get the rebuff, ‘if a barber can be changed
to an upper caste, why not change a black dog to white?’ making the king
realise his folly”. These buffoons are what Indian media consist of and these shocking
mindsets find easy acceptance, indeed it’s how camaraderie and blessings work.
Compared to these judge Sharma’s ‘scientific’ elaboration on peacock is far too benign.
The ossifying society with limited intellect creates deviant harmony
that curdles new forms of disgust everytime everywhere it spreads. Crude traditions and values takes
away the understanding of freedom hence human dignity, despite all the possibilities
that democracy and technology provides. Incapacitated to experience awe and
wonder, debilitated to value the vitalities and precariousness of life, and to
discover, to empathise, to imagine a better world. What a putrefying pit. I
feel sorry for the PM, who seems to have best of intentions; this demographic
dividend is demographic uselessness. Again I call upon international community
to deny visa and positively discriminate people with caste references, they
are degradation on humanity and as such have no place in civilized setting.
