When Bush Chomsky met Toba Tek Singh !!

It was only yesterday that I came to know that Chomsky (the high priest of commies) had infact given a clarion call to people of Nandigram!!. I don’t know what it really was (the fellow who told didn’t elaborate much) but the gist seems to be: don’t divide the commies since they have bigger mission like protecting Tehran from US. Don’t know whether Governor of Bengal communicated these sacred thoughts to people of Nandigram yesterday (Budhadeb and his cabinet in the meantime must been celebrating Dada’s century, Nandigram where?!!).

When the brain gets gangrened certain kinds of thought start infesting and that is precisely what is happening with Chomsky. These superstructure manifestations in his thinking see people as pawns for bigger cause. It is part of systemic response. It is an affliction with commies particularly armchair types who help in the sucking of common people (so where is Amartya sen babu??. It is the season of migratory birds...time for visits and talks on primary education, PHCs, microcredit and so on!!. Also for Turd to get intellectually horny. I guess it is the climate!!).

In most case they are similar to the carved out adversary, they have just split the territory. Both live in idealized world of absolute freedom in their own term. The reason why absolute freedom without any responsibility strike such a unique cord here (ask Bush Chomsky). With market encroachment (even of villages) things have become volatile, sophistication of social relation and responsibility have given way to market quick fix and superficialities.

This blogger is strongly for ‘Freedom of expression’ provided each person has the equal access and means, it should be level playing field otherwise it is an instigation that will be reacted and yes manipulated. Romila Thappar mentions in her book that late Gupta period was age period of indulgence, and so Khajarau (this offcourse as a reaction to Golden age theory-influenced by Right). How the recent attempt on vandalizing sacred in the name of art not indulgence by the same logic. If indulgence be freedom of expression then reaction will be as vicious. By definition indulgence lacks responsive behavior, it is the basics through which market gets foothold- the reason why market is in forefront of freedom of expression, and its belligerent posturing in recent times. Left is only flip side of the coin. It is what they say ‘power struggle’. There are lots of intellectual pimps doing the round in this war zone for our sake who not very often indulge in licking the putrid puss of left bins, some have even condoned the killings another exmaple is that of artist Von Gogh. Murder as reaction can be tolerated and justified when by islamists!!. And in this world view islamists are closest cousins of Left against Bush & Co. Chomsky would argue killings as part of ideological and geographical dislocation. Under right ideological and geographical framework a killing is sacrifice, murder an act of bravery. Nation State will agree, fundamentalists will support and yes commies will celebrate. Chomsky has finally achieved what he always theorized: Manufacturing consent!!.

So what did Toba Tek Singh tell Chomsky?

‘Opar di gurgur di annexe di bay dhiana di mung di daal of the laltain’. What else!!

So what did Toba Tek Singh tell Bush?

‘Opar di gurgur di annexe di bay dhiana di mung di daal of the laltain’. What else!!

Bush and Chomsky instantly understood what he said and replied in unison ‘mung ki daal of the laltain.....oye chak de patte’