…you really don’t have to spend
too much time with a person to know that this twice elected MP has not
contributed for what he was elected for. A parliamentarian has to be actively
involved in daily proceedings of the House, and need to contribute. His
presence and interventions in the Parliament has been nothing short of abysmal,
even in cases of important discussions. His argument seems to be ‘working for
the party’ and grassroot level involvement, now if that is the case why did he
waste the money of the exchequer by becoming an MP? How irresponsible indeed.
Why should people elect this person again? We would like to know how is he “maybe
an excellent alternative”?
Everything said and done I have
high regards for Mr. Sen, in particular, his views on population growth and
fertility rate… so on. Little magazines and big talks flows through the genes!! Courtesy cannot be bought from the market.
