Deal with him strongly

This blogger is ready to give everyone a chance and keeps an open mind about things, hence will not be prejudiced by narration and counter narration, being fully aware these are same kind of people in different outfits. Every person will have to be dealt on his or her merit and not on perception or views of obnoxious self-serving conscience keepers. Amit Shah has crossed the line, and he will have to be dealt severely. He is holding an extremely responsible position (as the head of largest political party as also heading the alliance that forms the government), and arguably he has tarnished these. The political party concerned, or its moral torchbearer RSS, should severely curtail these kind of utterings. This is not only blatantly communal but also brings shame to the nation for being compared to a country that cannot even be called a proper democracy with non-existent minority rights. In his depraved utterings he has also given credibility to sickular liberal elitist narration that seeks to see Pakistan as linchpin of its subtle ‘minority values’. This counter narration is a trap that seeks to polarise as also severely ridicules common people’s sensibilities and trivialises their aspirations. Amit Shah will have to be dealt severely by Election Commission, if they don’t show spine then SC will have to intervene. This cannot be the new normal.

     

Patwardhan kriya

It goes without saying that Anant Patwardhan is one of the most competent documentary maker around. Over the decades he has made some incisive and path breaking documentaries; in the overwhelming mediocrity that India is he clearly stands out as an exception. And I must admit he has been quite an influence in many ways. His recent attics though reeks of self-indulgence and righteousness that is quite beyond what is the need, it is very likely that he has surrounded himself in exaggerations hence being crudely alarmist the way of dealing. Most significantly if he is so concerned about the society then why has he even accepted these awards from a society that symbolises discrimination in its every acts and being? Why does he hobnobs with media that actively promotes primitive ways? (thankfully many international columnists have stopped contributing to these putrid pits. International community should severely scrutinise Indian conscience keepers and their clever ways). Last but not the least what will it take from him to spent 100R to get his casteist reference dropped and be civilised? Clearly he cannot be part of the primitive and claim high moral grounds. It is not allowed in civilised society. No dear not allowed.

This society seems to be built on myths and perceptions. Common people have been treated as juvenile who could go delinquent if not fed with bed time stories and kept under control, meanwhile the elite section claw for the spoils. With the technological innovations society is opening up and people are able to assert themselves (including this blogger, few decades back I would be easily stamped out and thrown into the nearest dustbin), things will have to be opened up. Mahatmas and pundits will be open to scrutiny, as also the degraded nature of this society that seems to be taken as way of life. Angst is natural, so is feeling of loss for the good old days when honey dropped from the sky. That the elite section is amazingly mediocre is given but their extent of imposition on the society is what is frightening. That they are able to dictate terms and manipulate narration makes it sinister. They have severely degraded the society and created misery by their incompetence. You can disagree without being disagreeable is a nice try. The pertinent question here is how are these primitive people at the helm of affair? It is indeed difficult not to be disagreeable with debauched ways, ideally this blogger will have nothing to do with these people and will steer clear of these disgraceful presences but when they are at the helm then they will have to be dealt. Returning awards is therefore not only opportune and an attempt at mischief but also trying to place thyself in higher conscience that really cannot go unscrutinised. This normal is unacceptable. 

Prosecute him

Attack on Iraq by Bush-Blair alliance in 2003 was a mischievous act that created lots of misery. It is a common knowledge that deterioration of the region started with this mischief. ISIS can be, to a large extend, traced to invasion of Iraq. Not denying that the dangerously deteriorating situation has also to do with patriarchal and patronising nature of religion/society manipulated by powerful, that seem to be not in consonance with democratic values nor humanitarian concerns hence the egalitarian intent of Arab spring, that was supported by common people, couldn’t spread its roots and institutionalised. It fettered away into something sinister in the vacuum. It is the cruder nature of the religion, that seeks to destroy quaint traditions and culture, has found expression in this brutal power struggle.  

This blogger recalls being appalled by the preparation to attack Iraq with their self-serving logic and spurious intentions. We (I don’t recall the people who helped) did collect voices of people within our reach against this madness (passing on to Kasturi&sons makes me cringe, unfortunately there were no blogs during those days. We are so grateful to the inventors of these platforms; there is no need for pretentious arbitrators and adipose layered arrogant middlemen).  It was quite clear that this will lead to dangerous outcome, wherein the target and focus should have been on Taliban Afghanistan. Saddam Hussein, though obnoxious, could have been a stable ally and later eased off with democratic alternative. Easier said than done but one thing is sure: invasion of Iraq messed up the situation and caused deaths and misery. Bush had an agenda and Blair provided the 'sexed up' alibi. There is definitely a case against Blair, International Court of Justice must show some spine and initiate action. It must exhibit the same enthusiasm that it shows against despots in Africa. 

On consumption…

These few lines I read the other day, something I always believed in…less buying, less wasting, less spending, less time on working to earn money, more time …(However now the problem is even the basic needs are becoming quite costly, right from staple food, house rent so on, some of the latest gadgets have become essential, but i guess it is a one time investment, the upgraded versions don't add much value, mostly superficial). 

The second you open your wallet to buy something, it costs you – and in more ways than you might think. Yes, of course there’s the price tag and the corresponding amount of time it took you to earn that amount of money, but possessions also cost you space in your home and time spent cleaning and maintaining them. And as the token environmentalist in the room, I’d be remiss if I didn’t remind you that when you buy something, you’re also taking on the task of disposing of it (responsibly or not) when you’re done with it. Our addiction to consumption is a vicious one, and it’s stressing us out.

This is why some normal adult human beings can live in houses just 426 square feet and others find that not even their 2,500-square-foot McMansion feels big enough. It’s almost never the amount of space that’s the problem, but the amount of stuff.

So if bigger homes aren’t the solution, what is? I suggest heading in the exact opposite direction: deliberately choose a life with less. Buy less and instantly you have less to store; you use less space. Eventually you can work less to pay for all of this stuff. Soon you will stress less too and, above all, your life will involve less waste.

(from an article titled Buying begets buying: how stuff has consumed the average American's life by Madeleine Somerville)

When Deshpandes and Vajpeyis conscience emit compassion like feelings…

In good old days this blogger always used to make the mistake of confusing conscience and conscious, and never could tell the difference nor did I ever got the spelling right. So the best way to deal with these was to avoid it altogether or look for spellable substitute. Very soon I realised that these are important words and really cannot be ignored, the substitute don’t really measure up. So here it is; Conscience refers to a “person's moral sense of right and wrong” while Conscious means “being aware of and responding to one's surroundings”. I also realise that these two words are quite interlinked since without conscience conscious is hollow, it’s a world of moral ambiguity and convenient ethical values. While without conscious conscience is meaningless, morality in the absence of awareness of surroundings is self-obsession, a crude reflection of oneself as also motivated. The latter is the context here: the sparkling conscience without conscious. The matter of conscious becomes quite blatant when Deshpandes and Vajpeyis descend to express their conscience.

It is a well-documented fact the way this society cannibalises on its weak. After the so called independence it was expected that the rule of law and institutions of democracy would create an egalitarian society, but that really hasn’t happened. There have been systematic atrocities committed on the weakest, specifically the dalits and the tribes, or whoever fills in the space of the vulnerable in the context. Squatter’s barbarism is replicated as desired ways of mobility, the reason why this society is amazingly brutal minded and discriminatory, all depravities are kept intact and celebrated in non-violent ethos, constantly searching the nuances in semantic jugglery to appear civilised. Hence there is tremendous enthusiasm in fawning to the powerful and exploiting the weak. As the squatter’s crude hold gets weaker (or as some move to sickular liberal pastures) the next in line strengthens the framework and establishes cruder attitude in all its viciousness. With the advent of divisive politics in the name of democracy and market greed in the name of development, the exploitative ethos gets channelized into next opportunity. The act of dehumanisation is random but the mechanism is same. This society is adept in classifying human beings and has a ravenous delight in exploiting the marginalised while constantly showering encomiums on itself.

 Vajpeyi writes “One of the most ancient in the world, this tradition belongs to a civilisational enterprise called India. It is perhaps the largest in the world, unique in its plurality of language, religion, custom, cuisine, costume, craft etc. Nothing in India has remained singular for long, everything sooner or later turns plural or becomes part of a large plural. Not god, nor language, not system of philosophy and reflection, nor faith and worship, not to speak of belief and value. There have always been forces amongst us who do not like this deeply enriching plurality and who would see it replaced by some kind of uniformity which they believe would be more manageable. Our tradition has not only been one of plurality but also of dialogue and accommodation, interrogation and dissent, of public debate, innovation and scrutiny. The shastraarth, one of the unique institution of public testing of ideas and insights used to take place in public between contesting view points. The Indians have never been afraid or intolerant of dissent or debate”.

Obviously it has some truth but I firmly hold that these ideas were not confined to India, to elevate it as “civilisational enterprise called India” –the Jagathguru syndrome, is an exaggeration the kind the Vajpeyis and Deshpandes are very prone to, and something we are tolerating for long time. The angst here being that this superior understanding of oneself are now being hijacked by right wing hooligans lock stock and barrel all intact, even Gandhi, with such desultory ease that this in itself should have raised eyebrows. But they lament for the past. The tolerant accommodative idea of India was always threatened by the very forces that Vajpeyis (bahuvachan is a celebration on camaraderie and casteist pits that he signifies) burdens as his identity, the shining beacon. Argumentative Indian and accommodative nature were necessarily vibrant presence outside squatter’s grip, and that is definitive ethos of this society without stressing it as something unique. Those ensconced in squatter were a constant threat to common people and their ways, these severely dwindled liberal spaces and attempted at replacing with crude world. This attempts at usurping the vibrant nature of society and placing within squatter is devious and will not be allowed to go unchallenged. It is also not ironic that even likes of Amartya Sen seem unaware of these myth building by liberal masquerading elites, he seem oblivious of casteist putrid pits from where these charades emanates.

The squatter ensconced elite have been having firm control over narration for time immemorial, and therefore this contemporary reconstruction (with amazing expertise on myth building) as egalitarian benevolent creature is an absurdity and mocking on the misery of the people. The depravity and the horrendous nature of the society is all there for the world to see. These are the facts, easily verifiable from the skewed nature of this society and its ways. They systemically degraded the people and attempted at destroying the soul of the society. It is thanks to some great souls/saints and their compassionate ways that this society was able to keep its ethical fibre and egalitarian ethos intact. Squatters were consistent threat to this intricate social fibre, and constantly ployed to dehumanise, degrade and divide people. Vajpeyis and Deshpandes therefore are the part of the system that was always threat to these egalitarian ways of this society and their self proclamation as “conscience-keepers of the country” is severely questioned. We surely don’t want them to ‘reclaim space’.

When Vajpeyis exalts Indians for the tradition of “dialogue and accommodation, interrogation and dissent, of public debate, innovation and scrutiny”…“Even gods have been questioned and some of them have been punished” he is again talking of two distinct, mutually exclusive, worlds. It is clear that this is about squatters and their camaraderie, this vaad samvaad parampara of the elite was very narrow and worked within select and limited frame, wherein the intruders were severely dealt. This sanctum sanctorum driven speculation of exaggerated selves and souls were of not of much interest, indeed absurd ideas and wasteful ways in most cases. The real nature of Indian society was working against these mediocrities and crude ways that constantly sought to engulf it. Romilla Thapar puts an interesting postulate in this context: if it was Buddha instead of Krishna how different Bhagvad Gita would be? Indeed that is the crux of the matter, this clever use of gods and rituals to trap people into squatter’s nefarious ways. Compassionate Mahabali (a king condemned by squatter’s clever ploy, hence myths and stories to cover up what is clearly a murder), Mahishasura (benevolent soul condemned as demon, therefore killed)…these are minor examples of the ways in which narrations were controlled to gain the primacy, meanwhile degrade society and severely infect collective conscience. Eviction of Buddha and negation of his amazing understanding was the beginning of the putrefaction as squatter tightened their grip, while societies that understood Buddhism gained immensely and progressed in this rational spiritual impetus that spread compassion and blossomed. Meanwhile, since common people had great respect for Buddha, he was conveniently converted to a god while his teachings were pushed aside with alacrity. It is the tradition that questioned the degrading ways of squatter, that very much precedes Buddha and can be traced to Upanishads, produced many saints and seers who have been the saviours. They helped to work on righteousness and moral fibre of this society, and kept the ethical ethos and its plural accommodative nature as the abiding ways and basic characteristics of the people. 

Deshpandes and Vajpeyis are not part of this egalitarian narration, they are masquerades who are working out their sickular liberal credential, trying to opportunistically distinguish from their brethren and sinisterly attempting to usurp the tolerant nature of society into squatter (i am acutely aware of some cultural lafangas who expertise in these and act as strict gatekeepers into hallowed circle). They are firmly tethered to the exploitative system that constantly tries to engulf Hinduism to putrid pits. That these people have firm control over narration and have amazing myth building expertise doesn’t really change the reality. Pleasing mullahs/elite muslims is part of this game, it gives them the credibility as liberal accommodating souls and claims to some great tradition that nobody seem much aware. It needs to be strongly reiterated that there is a huge gap between vulnerable muslims and elite muslims (that includes the regressive mullahs on one side and the liberal hedonists, known for their wanton ways, on the other). This is an elitist game hence the vulnerable people and their varying contexts are constantly pushed into these camps, therefore the elites play spokesperson. This camaraderie of elite acting as spokespersons –essentially feudal lords, is qualified as tolerance and celebrated among this clique. New entrants into political frame seem to have disturbed this cosy setup.

It is also not surprising that for the Vajpeyis of the world “the Emergency, Sikh Riots, demolition of Babri Masjid, Punjab terrorism, Nandigram violence and naxalite and state violence in tribal areas, Gujarat pogroms etc have all provoked writers and artists to protest against and condemn the damage done to social fabric, communal harmony and creative life” is the narration. This is the gist and a brave attempt on what troubles the sickular liberal elite. It is amazing and telling that nowhere there is a mention of caste related atrocities that severely degrades this society that is the root of most of the ills of the society. Apart from demeaning pits and traditions herein, there is blatant violence against the most vulnerable of Indian society, that encompasses all religions, indeed what is described as communal riots many times have seeds in this context. It is therefore much sinister and depraved than religious divisions. That this is conveniently ignored is what defines this nexus and shows the angst filled protagonists as fake. Statistically 27 acts of atrocity are perpetrated on dalits every day, 13 dalits murdered every week and 3dalit women raped every day…not to forget discriminations faced every living moment, as also biases from the so called democratic institutions, the lackadaisical law&order machinery, judiciary (Court movie quite effectively depicts this biases and clever nonviolent ways that is used to brutally subjugate voices, as also the entrenched discriminatory attitudes). All because some are born into something that is part of squatter’s cruel imagination, and that this is very much endorsed by Deshpandes and Vajpeyis is what makes the deceit compelling. Lakshmanpur Bathe massacre, Bathani tola massacre, Khairlanji massacre…the list is long, these brutal killings seemed to have awakened no one, probably not many are even aware. That is because angst on these matter will quite easily strip their mask, it is a big hole in the business of conscience keeping that the Indian elite are well aware of. 

On matters of customary rights

Thakur is a reference to feudal lords, this medieval reference are carried by some people as embellishment, an indication of superior self, an entitled achievement that has significant pointers in casteist pits. Bearing this crudeness, that detrimentally degrades social dealings, individual attitude towards others and a constant dread to egalitarian values is referred to as tolerance. It’s like the second amendment in US, the sacred rights to carry fire arms, an amazingly deviant society that has the history of slavery and brutal methods to control. Quite evidently this right is the extension of these brutal practises, and can be gauged by the people who support this as also heinous practise of trophy hunting. Indian elite have much in common with American far right, though they divide themselves neatly into liberal and traditional that they are tethered to squatter, and don’t mind revivalism on these matters, is what clinches the deal, it makes stray sacrifices worth it ounce. From these conservatives degrading pits they construct groovy liberal world. Hilariously some even masquerade as leftists, comrades in Bengal are known to be consuming moral renegades!

When Thakur dunked in the entitled reference makes his anachronistic presence into modernity this act is referred to as stellar representation of plurality, the crude nuances emanating from this is celebrated as tradition and culture, hence diversity. Now when Thakur works his way into judiciary, with amazing ease that comes to anyone who has heightened awareness of social norms and traditions, the adherence and benefits, concomitantly amazing lack of moral bearings or ethical contexts in this insistence of debauched framework, then we have Justice Thakur. Justice Thakur is heights of oxymoron if there is any, makes it compelling when he is the judge at Supreme Court. It’s like Saint Hitler beatified by Pope. Truly contemptuous, my lord. Now that we know our protagonist let’s get into the crux of the matter, it so happened that the executive officer of SriPadmanabhaSwamy Temple at Thiruvanthapuram (a conservative estimate of hidden treasure, that was recently found in this temple, puts it at a value close to 1.2 lakh crore Rupees or US$18 billion. If the antique and cultural value were taken into account these assets could be worth ten times the current market price. Now that is only one temple in small state called Kerala. Meanwhile India languishes at 135^th rank in UNDP HDI index. It is a miracle when you juxtapose these. Now the site has shifted to Business, Media, Politics and ofcourse Judiciary…essentially wherever there is money, power and yes ambiguous ethical standards and vague ideas on competence. IPL is a minor billion dollar enterprise in this context) was asked to “not be carried away ideologies, revolutionaries and politics” when dealing with Supreme Court. Clearly, judges (reigning lords) of SC, HC or even session’s court don’t have the right to ask what anybody should speak or not, significantly the insinuations are reflection of mindset and attitude of the judge concerned, this is strong arm tactics and a severe violation of individual’s right to express. What makes it shocking is that this violation is happening right in the space that is supposed to dispense justice. This arrogance is stark reminder of forces that seeks to quell voices of people. Indian judiciary is known for its gross incompetence, they have given lots of misery to the common people in the last many deacdes, it is also not unknown that they reflect their bias towards to the powerful and mighty. There are multitudes of cases where they are found to be amazingly incompetent, this after decades of lassitude procedures and lackadaisical ways of dealing, it is indeed the determination of the victims (and sacrifices they make) that the cases somehow reaches its logical conclusions. Recently after almost twenty years (that is like one generation later, in the meanwhile mylords have come and gone enjoyed the power and luxury, and ofcourse ‘settled’ their progenies –who sometimes champion higher causes depending on the lick so on) Uphaar case verdict grossly favoured the powerful, the absurdity is mind-blowing. Now this is high profile case as it is based in Delhi and exposed to constant media attention there are cases and cases that expose these amazingly arrogant but ignorantly assured mylords. They are so immune to people’s misery that it makes me wonder whether they are human beings, then I realise it is one of the stellar qualities that one assumes when placed in entitled surroundings very much assured by squatter’s depraved logic. This is what makes them so insularly cruel. Recently, the heinous massacre of Khairlanji was found to be wanting on perpetrators that this happened to the most vulnerable section of Indian society. That Thakurs of the world are congenitally incapable to see these “ideologies and politics” and inhuman “revolutionary” zeal herein is telling. Most importantly the judiciary should have by now evicted squatters from the temple precincts, this is a discriminatory occupation and gives legitimacy to exploitative framework, instead of taking steps to terminate these they ironically, in a shocking case of injustice and absolute lack of awareness of the social context and implications herein, gave all the rights to these perpetrators. This is what happened in Chidambaram temple. Incidentally, it is pertinent to note here that the meaning of the term ‘descent’ has been expanded to include ‘discrimination based on caste’ by the general recommendation number 29, the International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination (ICERD) 1969. Indian judiciary will do well to remember that it is a signatory to that convention along with more than 170 other countries.       

  

It is clear that the upper crust of Indian judicial system is conscripted from well-entrenched bourgeoisie evolved over hegemony of centuries. The elites are known to use nuanced language, that may imply that they are modern, while the brethren in the lower courts are known to be crudely feudal and primitively assured, savour this enlightened view “Hindu scriptures do not allow upper caste men to touch a low caste woman, the accused could not have raped the Dalit victim”, this is not a rare instance nor the attitude uncommon. Indian legal luminaries have this constant itch to express their deviant views wherein their mandate is to look at the facts, understand the context, show compassion, deal sensitively and dispense justice in all its fairness. But no, the characteristic arrogance and pupating egotism will have to express, the kind of uttering is sometimes so shocking that it numbs. This is our judicial system, and hilariously despite crude ways they are so much assured of their pontificating, as if it is their god given right and our fate. This is insidiously deviant, and that it thrives under democratic institution is a disgrace.

Coming back to the case at hand, Thakur’s rant was in reaction to the officer taking exception to ‘even’ half an hour slot given to the royal family every morning to exclusively enter the temple. The officer reminded Thakur that this practise was reminiscent of social evil of untouchability of past era.  This mylord saw as a threat hence necessary strictures. It is known that institution ridden with elitist and caste/class privileges frequently reverts to reactionary instances. Feudal and discriminatory institution are carried on with impunity under the garb of tradition, reminiscent of hoary past and severely denting democratic norms, many times making these values meaningless. Not a moment or instance of such demeaning practises should be allowed, indeed it is duty of the judiciary to enforce these if the legislature and executive fail. Clearly the institutions have failed as is reflected from degradations and apathy, and judiciary is reduced to defend puritan confines. Likes of Thakur are a blot on judiciary. Slant in reporting by media accentuates this, it is camaraderie in action, from this pits they look for legitimacy.  Yogi Berra, once said “The future ain’t what it used to be.” This blogger says the past ain’t what it used to be. They have constructed the past with a firm grip on narration and therefore use it for contemporary benefit as also show themselves benevolent. 

        

It is in this context that though, this blogger agrees with the protests by the writers against silencing of dissenting voices by thugs, has reservations. Nayantara Sahgal undoubtedly has a point and she ofcourse is a venerable legitimate voice but these deterioration she is pointing to and attributing to were always present. Ironically she might even be part of it, and significant reason for thrive. Not that I expect writers to be professional protesters (as they are accused for selective outbursts, this is a trick to silence writers) but yes strong dissent is in line. I haven’t really seen this in matters that have severely degraded the society. Indeed I feel as if I have stumbled into some virgin forest inhabited by long lost cannibalistic tribe assured of its superior place in the universe, strange rituals they perform while some act conscience objector as they partake the feast, contributing to the diversity and amiable tolerance.           

It is not tolerance but shared misery that is core to India’s survival

President Mukherjee seemed to have made a stirring appeal in the aftermath of deteriorating situation in UP, made worse by opportunistic politicians and degrading climate that predates any election, in this case a prominent neighbouring state. On a normal day in the dominant narration this is quite pertinent, indeed statesman like, appeal. However this blogger is not here to point out the normal and will make every effort to rip of the mask of misery spewing diversity, degrading plurality and fatalistic tolerance that defines the core of India that is sought to be asserted by the powerbrokers, the pretentious dominant elite, who have a firm grip over the narration in its garb of universalism exuding liberal tone. This will not be allowed to be passed, nor the indication of egalitarians nature of society or that the core of the society is compassion driven. No that is not going to happen, I can assure every reader of this blog on that. The narration will be closely scrutinised.

Indian villages are the worst sites of human degradation, hapless –sometimes genuinely nice people, are trapped in squatter’s degradation that divides the society and seek to tarnish even the souls of people. It is as sinister, and the tentacles go quite deep, emerging at the most opportune moments as attitude and choices. This skewed tradition and the crooked culture that originates herein is the cause of almost all the problems that Indians face. They create an amazing insular set of human beings who seek to strengthen their brethren feelings within the pits, in this conception others are either to fawn or to subjugate depending on where you are located in this crude world, the reason why squatter who hoisted themselves at the top of the heap generally carry essential features of humbleness that comes with assuredness of entitled fate. Dominant narration and control over policy making has seen to these being reflected in over wider array of institutions, hence these cancerous degradations.  

In the effort on social mobility and acceptance in the crudely discriminatory world, the lower sections tend to show fervency towards squatter’s, they seek zealous adherence as atonement of their misery. Meanwhile, as the society is being divided into pits and constantly feuding superiority egotisms that strive to take on the other group, they constantly discriminate/degrade others. These others are dealt with, what is described as stellar qualities of tolerance, essentially fatalism and sedate attitude towards horrendous ways that is sought to be cloaked in liberal worldview of tolerance! Very soon the elite manipulate frogs in the squatter’s well with much ease for their nefarious purpose, hence the target is now hapless vulnerable Muslims, who quite ironically share more in common with the hate induced perpetrators than the wily people orchestrating. When Gandhi sought to represent Hindus he was unwittingly (or maybe not) consolidating these forces, his reference to harijan was a tenacious attempt at this dubious understanding of tolerance (as much as Khilafath was consolidation of common muslims under elite muslims, putting seeds of division among common people) that accentuated misery through status quo and froze hindus under squatter’s conception and its sinister grip. The lynch mob is reflection of that enthusiasm. In quieter times they go back to cannibalising each other, in the varying degree of "pride, prejudice and preference". The disgust herein is sought to be presented as diversity and plurality. This is unpardonable.                        

 Squatters and their debauched ways have always been a threat to Hinduism, their predatory tactics were a constant menace to common people and their vibrant ways of life –the one from where all agreeable aspects of this society emerge. These vibrant and encompassing ways were emphasised as idea of India. Squatter’s therefore have been always been a threat to idea of India. Communalism is only variant form of casteism, it is the channelization of crude ways to a newer target, and that muslims have an international narration as also in the changing global scenario vicious varieties are always on the lookout, give them the traction that liberal squatters latch on to. There is also an intonation that one shouldn’t get personal. This decency is expected when one is placed in civilised surroundings, as also in the frame of debates in egalitarian setting. That they carry casteist identity, references and debauched ways then expect not to get personal is asking for bit too much. It is personal, indeed it is very personal. There was a war against Nazis, they were chased out and accounted for even after decades when some of them were infirm octogenarian. It was very personal and each one sent to jail. People with casteist surnames are part of conception that is a serious threat to the society, the degrading ways of society and deviant nature of democratic institutions can be traced to dominant hold of squatters over narration through official machinery and feudal structures. They cannot and shouldn’t be allowed to hide under hindu religion and equate with other religions hence claim religious rights and freedom. Mukherjees and camaraderie herein are present in almost all the institutions that are seeking to thrive under democratic garb and market competitiveness. They have infected this society into a sedatory reflection of themselves, hence this overwhelming mediocrity and lackadaisical ways as most fight with demeaning conception meanwhile wasting themselves and their competence. Recent studies have shown that holocaust victims have passed their misery to the next generations, these cataclysmic atrocities leave a deep imprints. Evicting casteist references and camaraderie filled angst is when the core values of this society can be safeguarded.

Recently I was watching a TVprogram (by Ravish Kumar, he is quite perceptive) on electorates of Bihar, the poorer sections were being asked their opinion so on. When asked about their names they all referred to non-casteist surname, this is what makes Mukherjees, Mishras, Trivedis, Sardesais, Iyers…so on easier in their ways. From this elevated selves the traction on sickularism is compelling, as hedonism adds to the charm while non-vegetarianism takes it to amazing heights of tolerance and compassion that a tribal man can never even think of replicating. There is a compelling “bania-squatter” nexus that is brushed under, the good omen harbingers has seen to a skewed narration of the news, ofcourse patronising ways withstanding. Casteism is the scourge of this society and unless it is annihilated this society will just keep cannibalising itself. I recall when I was a kid there was this Santhoshi matha ka paat, the one done every Friday by the womenfolk when they keep fast also don’t eat bitter stuff…whatever the nonsense I have no problem (faith is a subtle matter that anyone connected to squatter will rarely understand). But the wily squatters weave their net, it is constantly reminded during the prayers that “brahmin ke bachon ko bhoj karaye”, and here I was in a temple trying to locate the progenies as the scoundrel squatter arranged rather gleefully, meanwhile not very far malnourished neglected kids languished at the footstep of the temple with vacant looking parents. Ofcourse we are also aware of tons of waste in disgusting rituals, that is celebrated as tradition in mainstream media and movies (it is in this context that I hold that IIFT should be privatised or closed down, why should tax payers money is being used for these arrogant people). This is the core value of this society, and yes Mukherjees are very much part of the problem, as also those who are showing compassionate intent. It’s a farce. What Atman what Brahman?! This kind of superficial understanding of tolerance, pluralism and diversity is unacceptable; this misery giving narration has gone on for too long.    

     

Congratulating the government: This blogger congratulate the NDA government for the steps taken towards climate change mitigation. Mr. Modi is known to be keen and foresighted on matters of renewable sources of energy. Gujarat’s achievement on solar energy is quite pertinent here. 

Watch Martian !!

This is another must watch movie, a rather accurate take on Mars, the 3D impact makes it amazing. It is a must watch for school/college students, the emphasis on logic, laws of physics so on is important way of dealing situations, the basis of development and progress. The kind of nonsense that keeps happening around, and the usual bunch of manipulators, market slickness, traditions, perceptions…general deteriorations. Not that this was an ideal society in any way, far from it, I am doing a comparison with other countries and matters related to pursuit of excellence so on. Watching Martian was an exhilarating experience. It is an assertion of faith in humanity and possibilities herein. It also reiterates how precious planet Earth is!! 

People involved in these amazing pursuits cannot be frogs in the well –that distinguishes oneself in pits of crude traditions and primitive ideas. These  degradations are contexts of people who mindlessly follow or do minor/incremental changes…the one ISRO does, efficiently so. The reason why the former ISRO head (also accused of corruption charges) dunks in casteist pits while another one expertise in voodoo acts…to make it hilarious these dimwits have problem with each other! These are “scientists” of this godforsaken society (long time back, I recall, many ISRO “scientists” participated in rituals to propitiate gods to give them sons!!). New challenges need path breaking innovations and ideas, which undoubtedly is product of mindset and attitude that seeks to challenge existing notions. It is not providence nor is it a blessing from god-knows-where (and the slick sentiment seekers and profiteers herein). Logic is not a piecemeal thing nor is it a useable entity, it is a way of thinking and an attitude. It creates and sustains tradition of excellence. People who live in entitled world (and crude framework that sustains these) have much to thank for their position, than calibre, hence these nonsenses. In the harshness of reality it is not the propitiating that counts but logic and application of mind. For application of mind, reading and learning is important not blessing before exams or launching of a satellite. They have reduced learning to some kind of ritual and not as a way to understand, know and question.      

   

 Post script: Monday morning show is the best time to watch movies, no crowd, no crap, it’s almost like a private screening, and its cheap too…ah the charm of it.

Imposing way of life on others

Why is there a ban on meat/butchery and liquor today? Gandhi jayanthi is being celebrated is a nice thing; afterall he was one of the tallest leaders who strived to bring in morality into politics. But what has vegetarianism to do with celebration, as also being blatantly enforced with the use of State machinery? This framework and the intent/attitude behind these are the beginning of the problems; the fundamentalists are only extending/consolidating these, soon State is replaced by vigilante lumpens. This is a grievous matter and an assault on individual liberty and culinary choices, not to mention it being amazingly undemocratic. Further, the purifying intent that is associated with these celebrations is severely questioned. That this is the elevated way of life hence must be imposed, even if it is for a day, is what makes its reprehensible. Importantly, the insistence on vegetarianism, within a framework that is deeply inegalitarian and crude, makes it a sham. It is power play and debauchery at work. That this society has horrendous history of barbarity when it comes to primitive squatter’s ways of life, imposing and dealings herein needs to be emphasised and put into context. Also the fact that these matters have not been questioned or challenged shows the firm grip on narration by those entrenched in squatter’s and their dubious ways. Nobody can or should be allowed to impose on anyone’s eating habits. Most importantly to classify Hindus as vegetarians is questioned, and will be resisted. Indeed, Gandhians, if they truly believe in human rights, must protest and see that vegetarianism is not imposed. That, they haven’t for last many decades only goes on to prove what was always suspected.

Then there are hedonist marketers who seem to have taken non vegetarianism to a level of most enlightened expression of liberty, the one symbolising firm hinge on modernity. So according to this worldview non vegetarianism is liberalism personified, many feudal lords take these shortcuts to measure up to the West. Liberal sickulars too usurp these to distinguish themselves from traditional squatters, though sticking to vegetarianism does have an advantage in conservative section as also those tethered to squatter as mobility aspiration. The amount of non-vegetarian/red meat driven culinary programs that seeks to copy West (specifically USA, India being a vassal state in this conception) is amazing, and many times repulsive, as they try to extend the craving into impossibly cruder levels. It only shows how much they are unhinged from the society as also demented ways of dealing, a characteristic immunity to degrading environment and dwindling surrounding. These competing forces can only create depravity as they up the ante on morality and individualism. Control of narration is where the power is, squatters work it with purifying reasons for morality while marketer push in the hedonism as individual expression.

Post script: sometimes the vegetarian puritanism can take unfortunate turns that may even make some incapable to take on new ways of understanding or pursue truth, it becomes handicap to growth. Few years back I was on a nature walk with a group, I was speaking on the strength of elephant trunk so on and was explaining an amazing program in one of the TV channel where they do detailed post mortem on dead animals to understand them better, cutting into half and going into minute details, explanation so on, it’s a compelling watch. I mentioned this to the group, one lady started showing signs of disgust and fainting. I had to drop the topic, what was an interesting area of discussion was cut short, probably banned! The impact of this mindset is severe and telling as lack of serious documentation and study of other species, these were negated in this puritan enthusiasm and horrendous upper mobility crave. A land with amazingly variant biodiversity is dependent on outsiders for knowledge and initiatives.