Friday, October 09, 2015

It is not tolerance but shared misery that is core to India’s survival

President Mukherjee seemed to have made a stirring appeal in the aftermath of deteriorating situation in UP, made worse by opportunistic politicians and degrading climate that predates any election, in this case a prominent neighbouring state. On a normal day in the dominant narration this is quite pertinent, indeed statesman like, appeal. However this blogger is not here to point out the normal and will make every effort to rip of the mask of misery spewing diversity, degrading plurality and fatalistic tolerance that defines the core of India that is sought to be asserted by the powerbrokers, the pretentious dominant elite, who have a firm grip over the narration in its garb of universalism exuding liberal tone. This will not be allowed to be passed, nor the indication of egalitarians nature of society or that the core of the society is compassion driven. No that is not going to happen, I can assure every reader of this blog on that. The narration will be closely scrutinised.

Indian villages are the worst sites of human degradation, hapless –sometimes genuinely nice people, are trapped in squatter’s degradation that divides the society and seek to tarnish even the souls of people. It is as sinister, and the tentacles go quite deep, emerging at the most opportune moments as attitude and choices. This skewed tradition and the crooked culture that originates herein is the cause of almost all the problems that Indians face. They create an amazing insular set of human beings who seek to strengthen their brethren feelings within the pits, in this conception others are either to fawn or to subjugate depending on where you are located in this crude world, the reason why squatter who hoisted themselves at the top of the heap generally carry essential features of humbleness that comes with assuredness of entitled fate. Dominant narration and control over policy making has seen to these being reflected in over wider array of institutions, hence these cancerous degradations.  

In the effort on social mobility and acceptance in the crudely discriminatory world, the lower sections tend to show fervency towards squatter’s, they seek zealous adherence as atonement of their misery. Meanwhile, as the society is being divided into pits and constantly feuding superiority egotisms that strive to take on the other group, they constantly discriminate/degrade others. These others are dealt with, what is described as stellar qualities of tolerance, essentially fatalism and sedate attitude towards horrendous ways that is sought to be cloaked in liberal worldview of tolerance! Very soon the elite manipulate frogs in the squatter’s well with much ease for their nefarious purpose, hence the target is now hapless vulnerable Muslims, who quite ironically share more in common with the hate induced perpetrators than the wily people orchestrating. When Gandhi sought to represent Hindus he was unwittingly (or maybe not) consolidating these forces, his reference to harijan was a tenacious attempt at this dubious understanding of tolerance (as much as Khilafath was consolidation of common muslims under elite muslims, putting seeds of division among common people) that accentuated misery through status quo and froze hindus under squatter’s conception and its sinister grip. The lynch mob is reflection of that enthusiasm. In quieter times they go back to cannibalising each other, in the varying degree of "pride, prejudice and preference". The disgust herein is sought to be presented as diversity and plurality. This is unpardonable.                        

 Squatters and their debauched ways have always been a threat to Hinduism, their predatory tactics were a constant menace to common people and their vibrant ways of life –the one from where all agreeable aspects of this society emerge. These vibrant and encompassing ways were emphasised as idea of India. Squatter’s therefore have been always been a threat to idea of India. Communalism is only variant form of casteism, it is the channelization of crude ways to a newer target, and that muslims have an international narration as also in the changing global scenario vicious varieties are always on the lookout, give them the traction that liberal squatters latch on to. There is also an intonation that one shouldn’t get personal. This decency is expected when one is placed in civilised surroundings, as also in the frame of debates in egalitarian setting. That they carry casteist identity, references and debauched ways then expect not to get personal is asking for bit too much. It is personal, indeed it is very personal. There was a war against Nazis, they were chased out and accounted for even after decades when some of them were infirm octogenarian. It was very personal and each one sent to jail. People with casteist surnames are part of conception that is a serious threat to the society, the degrading ways of society and deviant nature of democratic institutions can be traced to dominant hold of squatters over narration through official machinery and feudal structures. They cannot and shouldn’t be allowed to hide under hindu religion and equate with other religions hence claim religious rights and freedom. Mukherjees and camaraderie herein are present in almost all the institutions that are seeking to thrive under democratic garb and market competitiveness. They have infected this society into a sedatory reflection of themselves, hence this overwhelming mediocrity and lackadaisical ways as most fight with demeaning conception meanwhile wasting themselves and their competence. Recent studies have shown that holocaust victims have passed their misery to the next generations, these cataclysmic atrocities leave a deep imprints. Evicting casteist references and camaraderie filled angst is when the core values of this society can be safeguarded.

Recently I was watching a TVprogram (by Ravish Kumar, he is quite perceptive) on electorates of Bihar, the poorer sections were being asked their opinion so on. When asked about their names they all referred to non-casteist surname, this is what makes Mukherjees, Mishras, Trivedis, Sardesais, Iyers…so on easier in their ways. From this elevated selves the traction on sickularism is compelling, as hedonism adds to the charm while non-vegetarianism takes it to amazing heights of tolerance and compassion that a tribal man can never even think of replicating. There is a compelling “bania-squatter” nexus that is brushed under, the good omen harbingers has seen to a skewed narration of the news, ofcourse patronising ways withstanding. Casteism is the scourge of this society and unless it is annihilated this society will just keep cannibalising itself. I recall when I was a kid there was this Santhoshi matha ka paat, the one done every Friday by the womenfolk when they keep fast also don’t eat bitter stuff…whatever the nonsense I have no problem (faith is a subtle matter that anyone connected to squatter will rarely understand). But the wily squatters weave their net, it is constantly reminded during the prayers that “brahmin ke bachon ko bhoj karaye”, and here I was in a temple trying to locate the progenies as the scoundrel squatter arranged rather gleefully, meanwhile not very far malnourished neglected kids languished at the footstep of the temple with vacant looking parents. Ofcourse we are also aware of tons of waste in disgusting rituals, that is celebrated as tradition in mainstream media and movies (it is in this context that I hold that IIFT should be privatised or closed down, why should tax payers money is being used for these arrogant people). This is the core value of this society, and yes Mukherjees are very much part of the problem, as also those who are showing compassionate intent. It’s a farce. What Atman what Brahman?! This kind of superficial understanding of tolerance, pluralism and diversity is unacceptable; this misery giving narration has gone on for too long.    
     

Congratulating the government: This blogger congratulate the NDA government for the steps taken towards climate change mitigation. Mr. Modi is known to be keen and foresighted on matters of renewable sources of energy. Gujarat’s achievement on solar energy is quite pertinent here.