Sunday, May 04, 2025

Spit shining western lens

 

West has evolved framework and spaces that contributed to immense development of humanity. No amount of relativism can deny this. Nor can it be denied that much of the world is in varying degree of barbarism, including spaces in west, instead of pointing this out and understanding, critically evaluating and showing empathy to people trapped in exploitative ways, devious people chose to institutionalize these as diversity thus severely degrading the world and diminishing egalitarian possibilities. This disconnect from reality happens when many wallowing in luxury seek control through complacent and easy narrations that is tailored to the need, meanwhile much of world is disconnected from reality and piggyback riding human progress without any self reflection. Compromised West has severe existential angst for diversity that clever primitives have evolved to tap to morph as civilized. They have worked out semantics of high moral deal to checkmate west in its ethical hypocrisy. Gandhian nonviolent brutality shined in British violent fairness. Caste cannibalized primitives met colonial brutal sophisticates; each understood the game of blessing that could keep the herd enamored while they shared expertise exacted through centuries of brutal systems of exploitation. While colonizers understood inbred mediocre’s deep seated crave for acknowledgement from whites (aligning with power to awe the herd is an old game) hence valorized the same who never had the temerity to question the brutal colonial exploitation and instead became complicit for efficient. Many migrated to west, especially to Britain, to take over as natural guardians of highest morals and are periodically summoned to assuage british angst.          

They exchanged words to fill in the ethical moral gaps and to create flawless semantics of compassion. With inbred semantic skills and characteristic deviousness caste cannibals actively helped monarchy feudals to shed any self doubt and glaring hypocrisy to work ethical moral framework for the world with colonialism facilitated reach of the language and cherished turn of sentence (which was sold to post colonial exploited spaces as bearings of great merit and intelligence, unleashing amazing of mediocrity that has become defining marker of south asians) meanwhile clinically dealing with any transgression to set narration. High ethical moral occupation made it necessary to show concern for poor people. Caste cannibals therefore added pathological regressive to oligarchical control of neoliberal left narration. Ridiculous moral grounds is the initiation of woke. It is neoliberal left that tarnished globalization into free for all migration. It is neoliberal left that placed monster mullah and his barbaric values/ways as lynchpin of tolerance that common people were expected to pass to be elevated as liberal or worthy of acceptance into their hallowed circle. And with their influence and reach they degraded societies all across the world, and now common people face the backlash of aggressive neoliberal right and unhinged right. The shift towards neoliberal right across the world is telling, even left is now centre right within neoliberal (whether in recent elections in Germany, also monarchist colonial feudal structure affirming white dominated Canada and Australia, meanwhile a little Jamaican girl held a poster which read “Kings, queens, princes and princess belong to fairytale NOT in JAMAICA!” This girl represents humanity). Such is the shift. There is nothing for neoliberal left to celebrate. They significantly diminished possibilities for compassionate world that nurture socialist values and collective response. It is also to be noted that with their presence caste cannibals made left (or socialist or even social movements) in India ineffectual as common people understood the deviousness. In west they easily worked into neoliberal left to degrade it further. They provided semantic ammunition for complacent hedonism afflicted west to carry the whiteman’s burden into deepest pits of diversity.  

Words like ‘pariah’ entered into English to give meaning to most depraved possibilities. These were authenticated and nurtured by caste cannibals the reason why colonial minded monarchist Britain has the audacity to carry on. Indeed a humanistic minded Tamilian woman wrote to Merriam Webster challenging words perpetuating caste values and raised awareness about hidden meaning. Egalitarian intents of Tamilnadu is now reduced to caste driven violent putrefied pit, not least through persistent work of gandhian nonviolent state machinery, now feasted by politicians and money churning entertainment. It is quite clear that caste cannibalized words have serious ramification. White man’s burden controlled Webster had the audacity to be dismissive. In their haughty estimation the word has moved away from original meaning! Neither did the word originate in west nor the meaning acquired in west so as to document change. Indeed, the self assured complacence and lack of responsibility is deeply racist –and this audacity can easily be traced to caste cannibal’s proprietary control and regressive presence, as it simultaneously seeks to appropriate and dissociate from original context. The word is very much alive in all its depravity, intent, and in original meaning in its degrading reality of oozing pus spread across South India. The word clearly defines the worst of human degradation that is only conceivable in caste cannibalized world, hence is able to uniquely define degradation anywhere in the world. It is a gift to the world from most brutal people. But then ‘britishery’ also defines something unique “devious control of narration through colonial defined values and reach”. This can easily help define monarchy’s role or feudal control in civilized world as a case of britishery. So why is this word not found in Webster nor in daily use. Obviously power is at work here. Certain words are chosen for appropriation from carefully preferred context, it doesn’t matter how much degrading and problematic it is as long as you can assert control through usage. This is oligarchical control of neoliberal left -as they actively pursue intellectual control of narration while they gorge in hedonist opulence. Words like ‘nigger’ was used with same intent but they were forced to drop as the people refused to be degraded and appropriated in white people’s world of lazy deeply offensive references. The same didn’t happen with ‘pariah’ shows absolute depravity of Indians, specifically those posing as moralists in west to take british eloi for bull ride and usurp colonial loot and benefits. It severely questions lack of basic ethics and characteristic mediocrity and indifference that makes Indian english speakers and writers incapable to connect meaning of word with the reality they are placed in as they grovel for acknowledgment from west. Meanwhile with all semantic dexterity and rare sincerity they assiduously spit shine western lens on humanity to evaluate the world in its assigned place.

Taking the most vulnerable exploited discriminated and cannibalized souls on earth and stripping dehumanizing slur of an identity into their linguistic flourish to define worst of human possibility while identifying with the perpetrators and nurturers of the derogatory system as arbitrators and proprietary controllers is how insipid british eloi playing grand empire wannabe in 21st century. They have the nerve to evaluate Indians and point out how we are not matching up while they themselves are severely compromised and incapacitated by their imperialistic nostalgia -bullying and canceling anyone who goes against their feudal ways and sacred monarchy. How is british media rated so high in press freedom when it is quite clear they are part of degraded world? India has serious problems with media (and a significant contributor is editor controlled cannibalized narrative as also market censored content; hindutva is only extending castetva frame…grassroot media is quite vibrant and has become more democratic and representative with social media) but to be rated so low in press freedom speaks of devious control that seeks to create spurious narration.

*we must use exact words which legacy media are incapable, like caste cannibals, monster mullahs so on, these are not only objective estimation of reality but also assimilate collective emotional evaluation.