History is not attacked. History
is created by wrenching the narration from those who seek to control past. From
those who use brutal narrative powers of past to hide the memories from the present.
Those who seek to alter memories of atrocities in the memoirs of nonviolence
and trophies of tolerance. Entitlements of atrocities is presented as benign
version to fatten on misery. There comes an occasion when reality is excavated
and flagged by dislodging the statues of horror and stamping the semantics into
forgotten meaning. There comes an occasion when reality is forced to be pushed
down the throats as a lifesaving tonic against illusions.
Tuesday, June 09, 2020
Creating history. Wrenching the narration.
Monday, June 08, 2020
Evolving a humanistic language game
The earlier Wittgenstein proposed
that we cannot talk anything meaningful about religion since these are
something that is unsaid like moral, good, so on that the use of language are
meaningless noise. The later Wittgenstein gave space to religion, and was no
longer dismissive of religious talks. He sought to understand the language game
in religious context to describe what role does this play in people’s life? This
is the point of reference. He insists that religious language game is different
from scientific language game hence these shouldn’t be mixed and used as judgment
specifically by scientific over religious. Sure, the way language is used in religious
context has different connotation but words do belong to the ‘same family’
hence there is an umbilical link that connects despite these negations.
I reckon we can easily propose, extending
the same line of argument, that there is as humans evolve and enlighten an
understanding of shared humanist language game. A collective alliance of higher
thoughts for instance like democracy, liberty and freedom. This therefore
becomes overarching parameter and the basis of evaluation. So this attempt at mystifying
religion into some other realm must be checked and negated. Every system that
impacts human and seek to control must be demystified and deconstructed. It must
be scrutinized and not be allowed to be reduced to problems of semantics. Primitive
anachronistic system that create regressive mindset, segregate humans and isolate
them from reality and surrounding with juvenile conceptions feeding on insecurities
should not be allowed to be mystified, to dehumanize. This kind of special consideration
to the system that is having serious impact on humanity because we may not
understand its context is a dangerous position especially in the contemporary
world we live in. It is diminishing the capacity to think as also negating possibility
to evolve into better. It is a source of degradation as also uniquely irresponsible.
It suits the purpose of status quoist and exploiters. We have to keep evolving
to use humanistic language game as a parameter of reference for any
transgression of freedom and liberty.
It is no surprise that Wittgenstein found
quite a receptive audience in Britain that seeks to preserve feudal systems
like monarchy (in the western euphemism of royal) as also its religion-church as
part of democracy. The impasse that UK finds itself in during this pandemic has
very much to do with these compromised foundation. It is also not surprising
that mediocre Indians latch on to it since they hinge their high morals by mystifying
putrid pit (it ofcourse works with colonial angst suffering fattened fluffs ready
to patronize lowest denominator –that in itself is extension of racism). For mediocre
Indians with limited philosophical tradition (juvenile conception within the
mainstream squatter frame are embarrassment that is being constructed as Indian
philosophy –absolute waste of time and energy except maybe for the likes of intellectually
compromised word defecators. What is relevant, indeed
refreshing and humbling, in Indian philosophy is found outside the putrid pit. This
is vibrant philosophical-spiritual-social space that traces from Buddha to
Nanak to Kabir to all the enlightened saints that in recent times have been
severely undermined by castetva forces, indeed desecrated with manipulation of
casteist as mahatma –it’s a serious transgression on ideas of enlightenment)
mystification was easy way to present itself as exotic. I seriously object to
including squatter ensconced juvenile wastrel thoughts and packing it as eastern philosophy.
Much enlightened thoughts have come from East Asia. It cannot be mixed and
mystified with squatter’s BS. One may argue that other societies from where
compelling philosophies have emerged had slavery, colonialism, racism and
misogynism so on. Ofcourse it is disturbing to know that beloved Greek philosophers
had no problem with slaves or that Kant was racist. Not trying to condone but
these were atleast based on physical demarcation, some objective facts, people who
were outsiders-defeated soldiers, race or even gender, but caste (extending to
casteism –that is cunningly sought to be separated from caste and normalized) is
unlike this -as also it is sought to be normalized making it a grievous matter. It finds difference among similar people, living in same society and deviously seeks through insecurities of faith. This makes it a worst inhuman conception that creates a cannibalistic
society that seeks lowest reference for the best ideas. A mediocrity thriving society that really haven’t contributed much to humanity except population as
cheap labor -a modern form of slavery. The casteist feudal deep state nurtures replicators. Rare instance
of smart sensitive people, especially children, are easily cannibalized by the society if
not by the family itself. Such is the level of degradation this society has achieved
(now you see spewing garbage by youngsters in social media, the worst kind that only religions and market have capacity to produce) but
the constant self-assurance as god’s chosen one’s –the incorrigible psychosis of
entitlement, is what makes it dangerous.
Wittgenstein, like Marx, is excitingly insightful and helps us understand the reality better but these arguments are flawed in many ways. There is nothing wrong in intellectualizing (this particularly true in frivolous nature of world we live in wherein the market onslaught posits thinking as waste) indeed it is needed. Where one completely agree with Wittgenstein is the assertion that language cannot be taken for granted. Though he was working in different context (structure of the language is defining the world) but it cannot be denied that language is source of control, it is used to control narration. The reality, history and even future is sought to be controlled through clever use of language and power. Market, religion and politicians -dictators have but used language to control. Semantics is part of the narration, it is very much the agent of control.
PS: unfortunately I got diverted
by religion. The original reason to put in Wittgenstein was to bring out the
point that when West deals with complicated societies like India (where things
are not as apparent as it seems) they tend to be complacent. They borrow words and
associate with their own context but it is from a different language game that
has its own nuance. Wittgenstein was quite prescient here (again that doesn’t
mean it cannot be understood nor it must be mystified, nor that one can
completely agree with him). Casteist feudals therefore used words like say nonviolent
and vegetarian which in western perception comes out egalitarian but in Indian
context extremely disturbing. This different language game (as also patronizing
low expectation that fails to get involved…indeed racist) is the reason why
there is confusion. What cannot be accepted find acceptance because it is
mystified, and there is no attempt made to demystify since it thought to be
different alien language game beyond our means to comprehend. This has led to increasing
misery as also normalization of worst forms of human dealing. Indeed west owes
(particularly Britain) an apology for nurturing worst kind of people and
systems. Also, I do admire Wittgenstein but his subtleties seem to have given
space to religion to firm itself (I even happen to watch a video of preacher introducing
Wittgenstein). This really cannot be a reference for challenges of 21st
century. It must be understood, thanked for the insight, and firmly rejected.
Friday, June 05, 2020
Saturday, May 16, 2020
Tuesday, May 12, 2020
Monday, May 04, 2020
Neo-liberal strategy
Sunday, May 03, 2020
Knowing
no end, no beginning
(shucks I knew it all the while!)
Friday, May 01, 2020
Tuesday, April 21, 2020
Fighting the "corona demon"
Mediocre as they are brought up in
worst dehumanizing references these incorrigibles will showcase their limited attributes. Exaggerating
and inflating minor matter to gain mileage as also creating narration of binary
where they spread thin as saviors of different warring sections (these fictitious
divisions are persistently nurtured as desperate humans are assumed to
be herds) and then argue and counter argue till they start frothing. Then there are investigative types. As I was channel surfing one inanities after another, intercepted
by crude actors desperately enticing to buy as they effortlessly amass money, I
came across this fellow “reporter” who found a cave full of hundreds and thousands
of bats, who probably were living there for ages, these were introduced to the
viewers as corona demons “corona rakshas” occasionally even as “Chinese demon”
highlighted through tone deaf loud ominous music with people in hazmat moving
in slow motion to nowhere. Hapless semiliterate villagers were informed and
interviewed about “corona demon” who, till recently were least concerned about these
bats, said they are now afraid. Even if
they are literate and able to use internet they will very likely end up visiting conspiracy theories
and worst self-consuming sites. It is as if these are programed to gyrate to
the degradation. Ideally the license of this channel must be cancelled and the
reporter shouldn’t be allowed to report but when standards are so low
where do one start? While on another channel another "essential" program during lockdown
was in progress wherein a fellow in fancy dress (attributed to squatters in
sh*thole north indian villages) was predicting future of callers during “corona
kaal” as also dispensing advice to viewers in general on all matters as humbly
as he could quite aware of the heavy burden he carried as arbitrator of unknown
indeed unknowable knowledge. How did this charlatan reach the studio? On what
basis are these scoundrels allowed to move during lockdown? Why are these even
part of news channels? While some religious nutcase need communitarian
solutions others expertise in social distancing to degrade people.Saturday, April 18, 2020
It’s a violation of humanity
As the crisis unfolds it is noted
that apart from cash rich Christian nutcases in USA Islam is finding itself
wanting in theocratic states (like Iran, as also Pakistan while feudals strictly
control Saudi hence pass writ undermining religion) and in poorer democracies
like India where theocracy has a limited control over common people the impact
is still felt. It has to do with communitarian nature of Islam (in that sense
in comparison to viciously segregatory values of hinduism it fares better but again
fails when it comes to women) however single source as revelation –which is strictly
codified, as also lack of renaissance like reformation finds itself majorly primitive
in dealing with contemporary crisis. This is not to say that reformation helps.
We have well passed reforming religions as a solution. Challenges of 21st century can be handled effectively by deconstructing religions and working on reality
based community association which cares, and is secure, in synergizing with
individual liberty and expressions. Fantastical fictions of religions are
becoming a serious threat and wasting precious time and energy. Also, people
with religious mindset are inherently unsuited to be part any solution least
wherein path breaking innovations are needed. World has changed quite
drastically in a century, particularly so in the last few decades. Reality therefore
cannot be understood or defined from the point of view of impressions of last
century. Hence these debates of science vs religion is quite obsolete. Rational
values, logical thinking, inquisitive mind, empathy based value system, seeking
spiritual connections is all expressions of evolving mind. Science is a necessary
extension of these expressions. Therefore primitive systems that stratifies mind,
segregates human and seek to assert codified insights of past as the only truth
(indeed miracle) doesn’t really measure up to even common sense. It can be
source of entertainment but cannot be taken seriously nor given any importance (even
if lots of people are hallucinated), and surely the attempts to express these
as defining identity of human being must be strongly resisted. It is a
violation of not only human right but is an assault on humanity. Friday, April 17, 2020
Fantasy is making it difficult
When your dealing with life is
based on fantasy, exaggeration and omnipotence then it is going to be problematic
to deal with the emerging reality. The kind of nonsense the world is facing
from Asia to US to Brazil to Europe has undercurrent of religions that is
working to undermine the threat humanity faces. Christianity is working very
closely with capitalism to undermine humanity specifically in countries like US
and Brazil. Anti-vaccination campaign is part of this balderdash, that is also
making fighting with COVID difficult. Conspiracy theory easily find place in
such people’s mindset when they are overwhelmed with fantastical narration of religion.
Islam is working to help create and fuel narrations of conspiracy at the
expense of common people who are being manipulated. Previously polio medical volunteers were attacked in Afghanistan and Pakistan, now medical staffs are attacked in India. There is also overplay of 'religion
will protect us'. Hindus, quite used to ideas of social distancing (indeed the hindu
priests in Kerala holds PhD in social distancing), are using this opportunity to
showcase themselves as sane, and indeed scientifically minded (the irony of it). Meanwhile I am
told there are astrologers who are able to predict future of corona, and the religious
zombies lacking common sense and nurtured in nonsense eagerly await these. There are other religion too like Buddhism, Sikhism, Jews...i am not getting into these not because of any respect. Once it falls into framework of religion -that is working on specifically written knowledge and rituals/miracles of the past as guidance to create followers instead of possibilities of knowledge that is yet to be acquired, when it actively works against inquisitiveness, open minded pursuits, individual expressions of creations, then it is working against humanity, it is indeed working against life itself, therefore nothing much is expected. It's a dreary dangerous place that religions create. Monday, April 13, 2020
Doctors are not needed
Thursday, April 09, 2020
Thursday, March 26, 2020
Fiction cannot tackle reality
Its amply clear that fiction minded (read religious) are constant threat to reality. These regressive values work to deny most of the crucial problems humanity face. When it is god's wish how can you take responsibility?! These segregation thriving fantastical fictions are going to be serious threat to communitarian response and humanitarian concerns. Further, these fiction minded who stick to the frame that deny reality in the garb of faith cannot be part of path breaking solutions (at the most they can be minor accretional contributors with all humbleness that religion inspires and denies). Innovative mindset needs a searing contact with reality and an openness to question and logically construct. Religions actively deny it, and is indeed a virus of mind that seeks to destroy humanness. Religions are freeloading on humanity, and its quite clear that its a dead weight nurtured and authenticated by some extremely devious section at the expense of all that defines humanity.
















