Idea of a nation

There has been some strident talk on the idea of India in recent times, and then the usual mishaps in Kashmir –where again the innocent soldiers are killed. I need to stress the word innocent here. In the clamour of claims and counter claims, it is sometimes forgotten that a soldier is as innocent and only performing the task for which he/she is recruited for. Idea of a nation is very much hinged on territory and Army is meant to protect its integrity. Any intrusion in its border is an attack on its sovereignty –the idea of nation, and therefore will be severely dealt. Though this blogger will like to see a borderless world but I guess Homo sapiens have come a long way and be divided in every conceivable way and create misery, we call it civilization!! Jammu&Kashmir is a state that is in turmoil for last many decades very much abetted by fundamentalists as also terrorist from across the border. The convenient claim by Pakistan that it in itself is a victim doesn’t cut much ice since it has to answer why terrorist find it easy to operate from that country, as also why that society is getting radicalized at an alarming rate, indeed an epicenter of world misery? It is a concern that the policy makers of that country will have to address. 

The whole idea of “Islamic nation” itself is so narrow, and is biased against other communities. To declare one’s land as ‘pure land’ (most likely taking inspiration from pure-vegetarian-didn’t-fight-for-anything but-got-everything status quo peace loving fighters across the border) is itself against the idea of inclusion!!  In such a set up is it surprising that massacre of marginalised communities happens so frequently, afterall they have to make it pure (the recent horrific massacre of Christians add to the tally, without any soul searching. This society has become so deviant that these colossal events are but series of incidents). It is a country that stands on wrong foundation and is paying its price. Right from, what is taught in school to the respect for other faiths, the idea of tolerance is trampled with impunity furthermore not finding any legal redressal, add to it continuous subjugation of democracy by the Army. The institutions of checks and balances are weak, and the framework that favours the voice of people has a minor space. It is a matter of time when radicalized elements seize power, already they have been tolerated on the streets, and gaining acceptance. Look at how LeT murderers are roaming around and spewing venom (I cannot conceive such a thing happening in India or any other civilized society. Britain, thankfully for us lesser people, has learned some valuable lessons. I gather the recent attack in Nairobi has British connection). Though common people have fought valiantly and came for elections to elect their representatives but the odds are heavily stacked against them. The fundamentalist elements in organized religions, specifically Islam (which hasn’t had much modernising period like Christianity, where it is opened to scrutiny/ debate and acceptance of counter views), come with a very narrow and potent readymade theocratic framework that reduces human beings to fanatic robots and  women to child producing machine. It creates a system that smothers freedom, and is death knell to smaller traditions, counter views and myriad ways of living. It systematically takes away vibrancy of life. Religious fundamentalism of every religion creates such deviant spaces but organized religion makes it easier. This makes it extremely dangerous and the world is facing the consequences for some time now. Across the world where Islamic insurgence is active we need to ask: Why is that the presence of this religion make some followers to behave in such extreme manner? Right from Philippines to Russia to Somalia… why is that some of the followers of this religion get radicalized so easily, and become threat to the society? Faced with this onslaught the State will have to respond, grievous the incursions severe will be the State's response. In the melee innocent people get caught up and so further radicalization as victims of unjust State and thus religion as saviour. In this framework the criminals, who should ideally be languishing in jail, becomes role models. That is the destructive power unbridled religious systems can unleash. I realize core of all religion has greater goodness but the system can be manipulated by worst of it kinds, as matter of faith tend to be accepted unscrutinised in the name of tolerance and secularism and so become instrument of exploitation. In this scenario murderers, goons and other regrettable creatures roam the street to hero’s welcome. Taliban is such a set up, acceptance of these by society shows how much it has putrefied. If the pus spills over then Nawaz Sharif cannot claim that the wound is our, we are in pain. He will have to take action, before it gets gangrene. Don’t expect the neighbours to empathize if they are in danger of being infected. Instead of looking at the situation as victims, therefore victimhood and so reasons for creating miserable world which favours the nasty elements, the society concerned will have to introspect.

The onus is on the religion concerned (read Islam, in USA its Christianity of White Republicans and other supremacists) and much less on society at large. If we are seeing these symptoms of violence manifested across the world, then the problem seem to be with the religious system. The reaction that “our religion doesn’t teach violence” so on has become rather trite. We need better explanation and rather unbiased stringent introspection. Further it need be introspected whether adherence to one’s faith or idea of life is impinging on others and creating problems.  It needs to start with an evaluation of what kind of system is in place like Saudi, if it doesn’t respect other faiths and different worldview then the rot is somewhere inside. It also needs to start with USA (in particular) and the lifestyle of wanton profligacy they spread through market driven framework that has started to affect not only the world but earth. If one’s faith or way of life is causing genuine problems to others or society as a whole then rather than insisting on other to tolerate, it is important to change a bit or give some space be rational. You cannot insist on medieval practices and expect people to respect. Yes they may tolerate but will not respect, and that is where the seeds of prejudices and biases take shape and finally leads to hate and violence.       

               

I need to add here that the West, in particular the USA, in the garb of modernising is pushing in an insular neo-colonial worldview that very much has radical Christianity at its core. It is being projected as a choice, masquerading values of freedom, but when we have a dominant choice spread across then it is not much of a choice. Take for instance the Gun culture in USA and how it is being spread across the world in the name of Hollywood/TV serials. The responses to such blatant incursions also help consolidation of reactionaries as happens in India.  English is being projected as harbinger of modernity but the popular culture space is being evicted to American sitcoms, which spread a worldview that seems egalitarian in its pointers but deeply insidious. It’s amazing that Indians cannot produce programs, even in a country that has such diversity not only as a society but as also biodiversity. Still the english channels churn western nonsense (some good for instance David Attenborough so on, but mostly the channels are full of crap), that is focusing on projecting lifestyle, ably supported by product sellers. In this increasingly consolidating worldview common Indians are seen as suckers –the consumers; while the Indian elites are the pimps –service providers. All the innovation, creation and manufacturing are done abroad, it is no wonder that Indian elite so zealously guard English as merit. It is a society thriving on mediocrity and manipulation, it’s all an exaggeration. Whatever Raghuram Rajan may do, Rupee will remain weak and will be susceptible to the American sneeze. Clever ones may call it globalization but if the masters aren’t doing well it is quite unlikely that the servants will prosper.

      

 Tail piece: I have a huge respect for UR Ananthmurthy, one of the foremost Indian writers. The response by the goons to his views is highly regrettable.  It is unfortunate but this Modi ‘debate’ is pushing into the Bush ‘either you with us or with them’, in cyber world it gets really nasty. I steer clear of these talks, futile since it is very highly unlikely Modi could be the next PM. I will not put my money on him, despite all the posturing he remains at longer odds though in a much better position than Mister Gandhi. So much so for This Vs That. These are TRP driven talks that usually sedate TV anchors indulge in to spice up their miserable life. Mr. Modi can take few lessons from Mushraff: exaggeration by social media may not translate into reality, indeed quite literally for Mushraff –bali ka bakra!!. My money is on an outsider, not from BJP nor from Congress, that is why I am so much disappointed with Akhilesh Yadav, indeed they could have easily called the general election and be in a better position. I am wagering on Ms. Mayawathi or someone like her from the regional parties. Not that PMs or governments make much difference, they don’t have much difference in policies, indeed they cannot, its being decided by the market stupid! But I guess I have got into the habit of wagering. Though immensely stupid and waste of time, the game cricket, I guess, is tailormade for betting, even BCCI chief’s moves are worth wagering on, it is a shame it is illegal. 

Enter the Kolatkaresque!!

The Butterfly

There is no story behind it.

It is split like a second.

It hinges around itself.

It has no future.

It is pinned down to no past.

It’s a pun on the present.

It’s a little yellow butterfly.

It has taken these wretched hills

under its wings.

Just a pinch of yellow,

it opens before it closes

and closes before it o

where is it

What a charming poem. Taken from Arun Kolatkar’s much appreciated collection Jejuri. I am in awe of this book, unfortunately I don’t have a copy and so had to go all the way to Pune, of course on the way to Jejuri. Last time I went to Jejuri with a rather primitive camera and that was more than a decade back, this time around I was much equipped.  I recall sending it across to Crude woman, it was quite an effort, but our disgust was having egomassage and used it to work on her branding. It did really affect me, I guess I lost my cool for some time. The miserable woman, universally disliked, was working on her little life and gaining on influence. Living on the fringe of Bollywood and ignored, she worked through manipulating awards (they degrade institutions) and latch on to cause as compensation and play victims oops survivors. So it was Rajiv Gandhi coming fresh from Shah Bano fiasco looking for wonderful Indian muslim pseudo secularism symbol that Crude woman entered the scene and has since never looked back on manipulations, she got a hattrick of bonus and RS seat (mediocre lyricist ZK Bozz is the most undeserving to be in RS, our man even manipulates to be compared with widely respected and talented Gulzar. Audacious indeed), next Britain was trying to look good after Iraq invasion and so lands Crude woman spick and clean as Gandhian. Try digesting that one -Crude woman as Gandhian!  They are such manipulative people that this is now a tradition and passed on to ZK’s genes. The little scoundrel is an unmitigated mediocre in whatever he does. At one point he tried to be face of Delhi Police (as if there are no delhites left to take it up) and simultaneously, must add blatantly, tried to promote liquor. ZK says its liberalz muslim brandingz. This is the talent that sycophant politicians based in Delhi admire, as they don’t have any mass base and work on manipulation, the reason why Crude woman and Co. gain such easy entry.   Incidentally Milkha’s story is quite compelling but such a shoddy acting. It’s a shame. I am sure Mehra was promised a National award. Asking rate these days is panch peti, says Crude woman, for dho peti she promises to arrange a standing ovation at international film festivals with add on benefits like ‘critical’ ‘superb’ by her domestic journalist pets. But must add ZK’s genes have not accepted Crude woman as alpha female of the family despite the fact she has done things akin to pig rolling on its back. She is person non-granta; I guess they know what she is all about. That’s another tragedy for Crude woman brand. With ‘high profile’ rapes coming and going, Crude woman not capitalizing on these sitters, old timers say she has lost her touch. She was one of the first to be off the block (even Usain Bolt will envy) to the TV camera/studio, in case of tragedies like rapes, expressing condolence so on. The reality seems to be that she is being evicted by ZK’s genes in these games of social concerned brands.

Meanwhile Crude woman looks out of window of her posh Juhu flat as people struggle to work out  day’s earning, she shrugs “sab ke sab saale langar ke murge”. She had her eyes trained on biriyaniwala murga. Of course international level “murgas” like Amir Khan or AR Rehman never allowed her to flutter near, these have been failures. But she is wonderful Indian muslim survivor brand. As ZK Bozz says “jahan pe bhi dange ho victims tho wonderful Indian muslim he hai, hum log hamesha se hi survivor hai”. Now that is the problem with Mr. Modi he doesn’t play the game of symbolism, atleast till now. Pseudo secularism survives on symbolism. In turn wonderful Indian muslim branding survives on symbolism. With no pseudo secularism wonderful Indian muslim brand collapses.  It is the end of world as Crude woman knows it.   

  

…too much crap that’s what happens when you deal with trash people, forget these nonsense the readers are invited to my birds blog www.iseeebirds.blogspot.com for Russet Sparrow and my visit to Jejuri. 

UNSC must take action

There is something heinous unfolding in Syria, and is quite clear that Assad regime is involved as more and more video evidences come out. Further confirmed by the fact that the UN investigating agency is prevented, nevertheless any action has to wait for final authorization from the UNSC. We are quite aware of 2003 Iraq invasion. Any such misadventure and macho moves will have severe repercussions as is happening in Iraq –a country reduced to everyday misery, and still no sign of WMDs. Those who ‘sexed up’ are still roaming free, I am sure all expense taken care by arms dealers. Wonder how the civil war is sustained in Syria, obviously outside forces are involved. An arms embargo to the region will be a good start. Instead of preventing the civil war and losses of lives outside agencies are fueling destruction.   

Despotic regimes who give no importance to democracy and people’s aspirations are no different to the so called Royals. They want to hold on to their privileges, thus they create system which fights for self preservation rather any human values or ethics. Even symbolic presence in countries like Britain speaks volume of the mindset. Any privileges due to birth should have no place in civilized society, these anachronisms are also an insult to former colonized countries, these represent a symbol of past atrocities (for a start how about jalianwala/bengal famine). Huge castles are built on miseries of common people, in this context the Independence Day speech by Indian PM from red fort is jingoism in its setting, you really cannot express values of liberty from a medieval edifice, for that some egalitarian framework is needed. Shocking was the admission by a head of a State, namely Julia Gillard, that she is knitting for royals, thankfully she is out. So when countries like Britain takes high moral ground on Syria we know what they are standing on, it is ‘proud’ history that beckons. As far as India is concerned it is a dustbin case, a nation sold out by its mediocre manipulative elite.  

Last of the grand

Zafar Futehally was truly last of the best that humans had to offer. It is also quite telling that the market media missed it. A reticent understated man deeply concerned with issues of Conservation, regularly involving -even when he was in his 90s, on environment issues of Bangalore. I recall receiving some mails from him just about two years back. He was a birders delight, with tons of perceptive writings and valuable observations, ever encouraging youngsters. I had met him few times, and took a picture of his once (you may visit me at http://iseeebirds.blogspot.in/2011/01/red-breasted-flycatcher-tiny-siberian.html). 

Happen to attend a condolence meeting held in his honour the other day. Zafar Futehally was the last of the celebrated troika of finest from a family in Ornithology that includes Salim Ali and Humayun Abdulali. It surely is passing of a generation…

Money can take you places!!

To their favour they will argue that this is only for entrance/tuition fee you will have to clear the exams to finally be awarded the doctorate. Very true and the same argument is also true in case for reservation where atleast a minimum criteria is adhered to. As the market says if you have money spend it, more spending is more consumption therefore more production and ofcourse employment and hence GDP.  More products will lead to competitions and hence quality and lowering of prices. We have seen that these haven’t really happened, prices have continually increased. Despite not doing anything wrong people tend to lose their money, as the value of rupee plummet, god knows why. Bernanke makes a statement and the economy of countries across the world is shaken, god knows why. Economists insist that the basic structure is intact and we should be proud, and should leave it there. And that this is globalization. I am sure I am simplifying things, but people at the street can only see these logics. The hardwork (mostly physical) is quantifiable input and is to be compensated in money but when the money is devalued then that is cheating, if it doesn’t compensate inflation then there is something wrong, it is not a fair system. In the meanwhile those who haven’t really done anything quantifiable get inflated returns. You may think it’s about great ideas, innovation and so on, the truth is profane. It seems the money has value in itself, and so they stack it from one place to another as is the return, no wonder it gets devalued because it is inflated on nothing. Slowly but surely it tends to become worthless. I am sure we are getting the drift, with crony capitalism it gets worst. In this context the only thing quantifiable is the Nature which will have to be exploited (looted is a better word). The villagers in Odisha (specifically Nyamagiri hills) said get lost to exploitative companies –neo colonial British company headed by an Indian (proud moment for making-the-country-proud seekers), desperately dangling employment generation carrot. What they don’t understand is for many people employment means much more than cutting the hills and making profit, and these choices are made by extremely impoverished people. Not very ironically the effort to entice them is made by extremely rich people, who could if they had the competence, put the money for better use. It is the greed and easy money, a terrific combination that defines Indian capitalist to a large extend. These are basis for investment, and so when they say ‘investment friendly’ you know what they are talking about. 

           

Consumption led system has not benefited people, it has only helped some section, who in turn haveexploited the Nature and degraded surrounding in the name of development. Most people know and it’s instinctive: it is not consumption but saving and judicious spending that helps them in long run. But market seems to be enticing them to fault, that is how the system functions!! Consuming less will see more products in market at less price, I think that is a better cycle despite the fact that it will make corporate less on profit or bankrupt, than consuming more, prices increasing and exploited for profit. 

If colleges in India are asking money for admission without any entrance criteria, as it is profitable, I am wondering what are the criteria for “prestigious” colleges like Harvard and yes Trinity College. I did some search and found there isn’t any except a terrific combination of money and power. Backgrounds of students from “third world countries” are a study in itself. There is reason for likes of Amartya Sen being proud, it is so subtle that it goes well with high tea!!

JNU ka junoon!!

That is how one TV channel put the gory happenings in JNU. It is unbelievable that this could happen in such a pristine and yes prestigious University. JNU has changed in last 15 years, atleast the type of students. Though the infrastructure and the surrounding haven’t changed, we did birding at JNU few months back, and I was so much thinking of days spend here, ferment and hotheaded days. The quality of students and the influences have surely deteriorated. I had the good fortune to study in JNU, quite briefly and significantly I was attending session/seminars/conferences/lectures randomly of different departments as it suited my liking rather than following any syllabus, it was a place to explore. I get to know some terrific people, though had a bitter showdown with some, for instance regarding Suhasini Ali’s big talk on Palestine during election campaign, which I thought was utter nonsense, as there are issues closer home and indeed urgent. These big talk falls into pattern, and are quite predictable. Anyway I moved out of the crap very soon, and found other interests, and yes I had expenses to cover!!  

I must add School of Language Studies runs mostly on the market demand than the real idea of exploring languages and its nuance, it seems to be a front for call centre and translator kind of quick job fixes. It generally tends to attract students of very low caliber and intent, they seem an extension of market. Though School of International Studies was rated quite high but I thought Social Science and Historical studies was the happening place, in retrospect I should have spend more time at ecological studies!!    

Arthshastri ka ardhsatya

…you really don’t have to spend too much time with a person to know that this twice elected MP has not contributed for what he was elected for. A parliamentarian has to be actively involved in daily proceedings of the House, and need to contribute. His presence and interventions in the Parliament has been nothing short of abysmal, even in cases of important discussions. His argument seems to be ‘working for the party’ and grassroot level involvement, now if that is the case why did he waste the money of the exchequer by becoming an MP? How irresponsible indeed. Why should people elect this person again? We would like to know how is he “maybe an excellent alternative”?

Everything said and done I have high regards for Mr. Sen, in particular, his views on population growth and fertility rate… so on. Little magazines and big talks flows through the genes!! Courtesy cannot be bought from the market.