History is not attacked. History
is created by wrenching the narration from those who seek to control past. From
those who use brutal narrative powers of past to hide the memories from the present.
Those who seek to alter memories of atrocities in the memoirs of nonviolence
and trophies of tolerance. Entitlements of atrocities is presented as benign
version to fatten on misery. There comes an occasion when reality is excavated
and flagged by dislodging the statues of horror and stamping the semantics into
forgotten meaning. There comes an occasion when reality is forced to be pushed
down the throats as a lifesaving tonic against illusions.
Tuesday, June 09, 2020
Creating history. Wrenching the narration.
Monday, June 08, 2020
Evolving a humanistic language game
The earlier Wittgenstein proposed
that we cannot talk anything meaningful about religion since these are
something that is unsaid like moral, good, so on that the use of language are
meaningless noise. The later Wittgenstein gave space to religion, and was no
longer dismissive of religious talks. He sought to understand the language game
in religious context to describe what role does this play in people’s life? This
is the point of reference. He insists that religious language game is different
from scientific language game hence these shouldn’t be mixed and used as judgment
specifically by scientific over religious. Sure, the way language is used in religious
context has different connotation but words do belong to the ‘same family’
hence there is an umbilical link that connects despite these negations.
I reckon we can easily propose, extending
the same line of argument, that there is as humans evolve and enlighten an
understanding of shared humanist language game. A collective alliance of higher
thoughts for instance like democracy, liberty and freedom. This therefore
becomes overarching parameter and the basis of evaluation. So this attempt at mystifying
religion into some other realm must be checked and negated. Every system that
impacts human and seek to control must be demystified and deconstructed. It must
be scrutinized and not be allowed to be reduced to problems of semantics. Primitive
anachronistic system that create regressive mindset, segregate humans and isolate
them from reality and surrounding with juvenile conceptions feeding on insecurities
should not be allowed to be mystified, to dehumanize. This kind of special consideration
to the system that is having serious impact on humanity because we may not
understand its context is a dangerous position especially in the contemporary
world we live in. It is diminishing the capacity to think as also negating possibility
to evolve into better. It is a source of degradation as also uniquely irresponsible.
It suits the purpose of status quoist and exploiters. We have to keep evolving
to use humanistic language game as a parameter of reference for any
transgression of freedom and liberty.
It is no surprise that Wittgenstein found
quite a receptive audience in Britain that seeks to preserve feudal systems
like monarchy (in the western euphemism of royal) as also its religion-church as
part of democracy. The impasse that UK finds itself in during this pandemic has
very much to do with these compromised foundation. It is also not surprising
that mediocre Indians latch on to it since they hinge their high morals by mystifying
putrid pit (it ofcourse works with colonial angst suffering fattened fluffs ready
to patronize lowest denominator –that in itself is extension of racism). For mediocre
Indians with limited philosophical tradition (juvenile conception within the
mainstream squatter frame are embarrassment that is being constructed as Indian
philosophy –absolute waste of time and energy except maybe for the likes of intellectually
compromised word defecators. What is relevant, indeed
refreshing and humbling, in Indian philosophy is found outside the putrid pit. This
is vibrant philosophical-spiritual-social space that traces from Buddha to
Nanak to Kabir to all the enlightened saints that in recent times have been
severely undermined by castetva forces, indeed desecrated with manipulation of
casteist as mahatma –it’s a serious transgression on ideas of enlightenment)
mystification was easy way to present itself as exotic. I seriously object to
including squatter ensconced juvenile wastrel thoughts and packing it as eastern philosophy.
Much enlightened thoughts have come from East Asia. It cannot be mixed and
mystified with squatter’s BS. One may argue that other societies from where
compelling philosophies have emerged had slavery, colonialism, racism and
misogynism so on. Ofcourse it is disturbing to know that beloved Greek philosophers
had no problem with slaves or that Kant was racist. Not trying to condone but
these were atleast based on physical demarcation, some objective facts, people who
were outsiders-defeated soldiers, race or even gender, but caste (extending to
casteism –that is cunningly sought to be separated from caste and normalized) is
unlike this -as also it is sought to be normalized making it a grievous matter. It finds difference among similar people, living in same society and deviously seeks through insecurities of faith. This makes it a worst inhuman conception that creates a cannibalistic
society that seeks lowest reference for the best ideas. A mediocrity thriving society that really haven’t contributed much to humanity except population as
cheap labor -a modern form of slavery. The casteist feudal deep state nurtures replicators. Rare instance
of smart sensitive people, especially children, are easily cannibalized by the society if
not by the family itself. Such is the level of degradation this society has achieved
(now you see spewing garbage by youngsters in social media, the worst kind that only religions and market have capacity to produce) but
the constant self-assurance as god’s chosen one’s –the incorrigible psychosis of
entitlement, is what makes it dangerous.
Wittgenstein, like Marx, is excitingly insightful and helps us understand the reality better but these arguments are flawed in many ways. There is nothing wrong in intellectualizing (this particularly true in frivolous nature of world we live in wherein the market onslaught posits thinking as waste) indeed it is needed. Where one completely agree with Wittgenstein is the assertion that language cannot be taken for granted. Though he was working in different context (structure of the language is defining the world) but it cannot be denied that language is source of control, it is used to control narration. The reality, history and even future is sought to be controlled through clever use of language and power. Market, religion and politicians -dictators have but used language to control. Semantics is part of the narration, it is very much the agent of control.
PS: unfortunately I got diverted
by religion. The original reason to put in Wittgenstein was to bring out the
point that when West deals with complicated societies like India (where things
are not as apparent as it seems) they tend to be complacent. They borrow words and
associate with their own context but it is from a different language game that
has its own nuance. Wittgenstein was quite prescient here (again that doesn’t
mean it cannot be understood nor it must be mystified, nor that one can
completely agree with him). Casteist feudals therefore used words like say nonviolent
and vegetarian which in western perception comes out egalitarian but in Indian
context extremely disturbing. This different language game (as also patronizing
low expectation that fails to get involved…indeed racist) is the reason why
there is confusion. What cannot be accepted find acceptance because it is
mystified, and there is no attempt made to demystify since it thought to be
different alien language game beyond our means to comprehend. This has led to increasing
misery as also normalization of worst forms of human dealing. Indeed west owes
(particularly Britain) an apology for nurturing worst kind of people and
systems. Also, I do admire Wittgenstein but his subtleties seem to have given
space to religion to firm itself (I even happen to watch a video of preacher introducing
Wittgenstein). This really cannot be a reference for challenges of 21st
century. It must be understood, thanked for the insight, and firmly rejected.
Friday, June 05, 2020
Saturday, May 16, 2020
Tuesday, May 12, 2020
Monday, May 04, 2020
Neo-liberal strategy
Sunday, May 03, 2020
Knowing
no end, no beginning
(shucks I knew it all the while!)
Friday, May 01, 2020
Tuesday, April 21, 2020
Fighting the "corona demon"
Saturday, April 18, 2020
It’s a violation of humanity
Friday, April 17, 2020
Fantasy is making it difficult
Monday, April 13, 2020
Doctors are not needed
Thursday, April 09, 2020
Thursday, March 26, 2020
Fiction cannot tackle reality
Its amply clear that fiction minded (read religious) are constant threat to reality. These regressive values work to deny most of the crucial problems humanity face. When it is god's wish how can you take responsibility?! These segregation thriving fantastical fictions are going to be serious threat to communitarian response and humanitarian concerns. Further, these fiction minded who stick to the frame that deny reality in the garb of faith cannot be part of path breaking solutions (at the most they can be minor accretional contributors with all humbleness that religion inspires and denies). Innovative mindset needs a searing contact with reality and an openness to question and logically construct. Religions actively deny it, and is indeed a virus of mind that seeks to destroy humanness. Religions are freeloading on humanity, and its quite clear that its a dead weight nurtured and authenticated by some extremely devious section at the expense of all that defines humanity.
Wednesday, March 25, 2020
We must thank unfortunate Italians for warning
A society that doesn’t have much sense to distinguish right from wrong nor any parameter to decide these in such instance righteous authoritarian interventions works well. Mr. Modi intervened at the right time to drill the seriousness of the situation. As a political leader he has been a great communicator. Most Indians are incapable to take decisions that has concern for society as a main context, being blessed they are incapacitated to conceptualize themselves as subservient to crucial social restrictions that is indeed matter of life and death. Many see these as affront to their special place in universe. In their grand world every occasion is an occasion presented specially to them to capitalize. It is a society in prisoner’s dilemma with no basic communitarian understanding. Hence it is important that rules are strictly enforced. Again we must thank unfortunate Italians, Spaniards and Iranians. We are incapable to be proactive nor can act with conscience. We need to be shown, and convinced, of the consequences with gory details with repeated requests. Since even this is difficult to get sense of the reality to zombies –who have been isolated from reality for too long, severe action must be initiated against the violators.