Sunday, June 30, 2024

False equivalence

 

When falsehood is not tagged by coordinators for dubious reason of balance of debate it is being wantonly unpardonably irresponsible. Opinions and views cannot be based on lies, it is a basic flaw, the onus is on the system to flag and rectify it immediately with corrections. It means media must be extremely competent to the task it is assigned. They must be aware and ready with each and every detail of the issue with fact and figures from authentic source. If debates are carried out in ethical vacuum with nobody taking any responsibility it degrades society, it makes discussion meaningless, it makes debate farcical. Also, we live in a world where intrusive tech is questioning the very frame of authenticity, manipulation is being weaponized. People are being bombarded with all kinds of videos and sound bites that are fake. Meanwhile people are being sedated with loads of inane information and outrage, and are systematically incapacitated to think. It is indeed natural progression of neoliberal controlled market media working on exaggeration and manipulation. Millions of people across the world ruin their life stuffing processed food which are promoted, indeed extolled, as smart choice for unthinking people literate enough to efficiently execute their inflated crave. Entertainers, and now godforsaken influencers, are cleverly promoted as opinion makers within this charade that has come to define democracy. It is people's choice. Nothing explains likes of Trump to be even considered seriously. It is a failure of society. It is also a failure of democracy that frail unfit Biden is made to assume that he is the only choice left to save the "free world", while others play tictactoe in the sidelines without any urgency for increasingly dire situation. Ofcourse they will not have to pay the price, it is always the common people who will be in misery, while they can easily position to be savior without taking any responsibility whatsoever and amass power and influence.

The other day NYT edit asked for Biden to step down from the presidential race. There was hue and cry from what you thought were sane people. Some ask why was no such call made to felon Trump. Well, this is classic case of false equivalence. Trump is the failure of legal system; they could have stopped him decades back; it is also an indictment of elite section who indulged and nurtured him for decades despite apparent grievous flaws. It is an ethical failure. He is byproduct of manipulation. The call to step down is a joke for him and his supporters since they reached here by gaming the same system which is now asking them to be fair! Waste of time, or maybe an occasion for moral positioning for incorrigible few. Asking Biden to quit is about realism, it is a practical first step in an alarming situation. Lacking critical thinking or awareness herd -with voting rights, are trained on perceptions, ‘strong man’ narration is foundational embed. Also, they seek confidence, connection and sense of security. They need someone to articulate the reality for them convincingly. Lacking critical thinking they live in logical fallacy of argumentum ad verecundiam, authority is always right. Hence authoritative figure must exude confidence, otherwise facts are suspect. In this world attacking the person weakens the fact! Facts are right or wrong depending upon the person, another of logical fallacy ad hominem. So, if Biden pauses fact is weakened. Imagine how degraded the world has become with constant bombarding of misinformation and disinformation. The reason why Critical Thinking need to be a must subject for students as also for media (as Taiwanese minister mentioned few years back, we need nerd defense against herds!). Interestingly tu quoque logical reasoning of pointing out the hypocrisy can easily destroy charlatans like Trump but that needs strong articulation, timing and context. These are simple basic needs, and if you cannot even understand this then what the hell.