Why monarchy exists in this modern world?

It is baffling that monarchy exists even in the so called modern societies, even one that prides for its egalitarian ways. I was going through countries that have monarchy; it is shocking that many countries in Europe too have monarchy surviving in varying form of pomp and vestiges. It is in the nature of primitive societies to give value to entitlement but when it is seen in modern societies one wonder what kind democracy or indeed democratic values they are espousing? An entitled world is in direct contradiction to liberty, and when you have these depraved conceptions existing as references then it very much degrades values and systems that safeguards human rights. In primitive societies like India where the machiavellian elite have been usurping benefits perched on feudal power structures and medieval norms it makes it difficult to assert democratic values. They quite easily push in status quo that thrive on discriminations, incremental changes are brought after much struggle and deliberation. You can see this at all levels in places like India, where the richer section thrive on misery of downtrodden. Socialism in the earlier part of India’s independence was the worst era, it merely consolidated primitive structures into evolving modernity. Wherein revolutionary changes could have been possible to counteract the feudal and medieval ways, they played around with fancy notions of nation building essentially feeding the entitled and dispensing patronages. They did nothing about the primitive structures or any attempts on consolidating egalitarian notions, if ever these were piecemeal efforts with short term gains. Most ‘leaders’ themselves were feudal lords, experts in patronising, even as basic as land reforms was ignored. That is why this blogger believes that two decades of communism after independence would have very well put a right foundation for Indians. Socialism brought in worst of both world. Communism would have very likely focussed on basic foundations that affects the common people, includes primary education, basic health, equitable distribution so on. This was the need of the fledging nation that had deep held discriminatory ways and exploitative mindset. That opportunity is lost forever, and yes communism too has lived its time. That really doesn’t mean that capitalism has anything significant to offer. Indeed they actively undermine surroundings and downgrade to lowest denominator. It isn’t surprising that debilitating issues aren’t their concern as they themselves are in the dock. This hoopla about minimum governance is dangerous thought, indeed it is an attempt to make democracy ineffective and play into the hand money bags, wanton consumption as panacea. Not surprisingly nepotism driven capitalism will have value for monarchy.

It is quite clear that monarchy has no place in modern world; its presence emboldens the feudal ways and impinges directly on to rights of citizens. Enlightened people must raise urgent voice against this anachronism and discriminatory mindset that it thrives on. As also the so called monarchy must shun itself and take initiatives to voluntarily give up their entitlements, even if it's titular (ideally a democratic society shouldn't have allowed these in the first place). They have far outlived their need and context. It is not only a burden on people but this idea in itself is degrading. It must start from the richer and enlightened societies. They must take the initiative to step down and help make the world a better place to live.            

It’s a reference, not an identity

There have always been successful attempts by Indian elite to twist narration to work in their depraved end. The mediocre debauched society and its crude ways are quite an illustration of it.  That these depravities are now mainstream narration of culture and tradition shows their clout and hold over this godforsaken society. It was reported that two Dalit children have drowned. This is how they twist it for requirement, this mischief is also to bring in their conspicuous compassion and crude opportunism that this society is so famous for. Dalit is a reference to point out discrimination and mindset functioning herein; it is not an identity of an individual. Identifying these with incident that has no reference to discrimination is a clever ploy to solidify identity that is functioning out of squatter’s conceptions, this also a valiant attempt to morph decadent home truths as they playact liberals. There is also an attempt on ‘Dalit literature’, as if a new organism is seeking light hence our duty to bless. Classifying people, putting hierarchy and then intellectualising is been a favourite pass time around here for a very long time, in the intricacies of these they find philosophies of redemptions. There is also a clever ploy to track similarities between ‘Dalit literature’ and Afro-American studies. Clearly there is a similarity in terms of heinous discriminations and violence, but atrocities on Dalits and primitive frameworks are much dreadful than any known form of organised atrocity in human civilisation. Afro-American was an identity, while Dalit is a reference, indeed twisting Dalit as an identity is itself an attempt on discrimination, that is worse than racism, and points to debauchery at work. Discrimination on Afro-American was on race and physically identifiable pointers, which in some sense was quite common during medieval period, as societies were quite closed and xenophobic. That it took the form of racism is what makes the voices of Afro American narration distinctive and empathy evoking. The difference here is that Dalit is a situation that is a creation of depraved framework that works within, among itself. It is a form of cannibalism. Handiwork of wily squatters to usurp the benefits and passing it into hereditary frame was an effortless consolidation. That the primitive framework is still thriving and the conspicuous compassion dispensing elite is cleverly tethered to it is what makes it uniquely terrible. Dalit and Afro-American are definitely not the same narration, the experience of heinous atrocities much similar but the framework entirely different. There is a clever attempt by Indian elite to mix the two hence to show themselves as compassionate. They are attempting to place themselves with civilised world, and jostling with enlightened sections who try to give space to Afro-American voices and strongly condemn acts of racism, Indian elite is also trying to find their traction in this hallowed circle. Gandhi was hoisted quite successfully, evidently everything else was muzzled in this juggernaut of conspicuous compassion; the apostle of peace narration quite cleverly hid the depraved elite and their primitive ways. They therefore sashayed the world ramp with compelling ease, representing and consolidating themselves as peaceful souls.         

  

While racism is condemned around the world and Afro Americans are protected from these discriminations with structures and policies under place (gun hugging white Americans falling behind in the civilizational scale). The primitive structures that created and authenticated Dalit atrocities are still in place, and not at all shocking is the Indian elite's attempt on positing as benevolent and competing with West as enlightened souls. The habitual offenders have created Dalit narration to match Afro-American, hence show themselves, therefore Indian society, as beacons of kindness. These ingenious attempts must be exposed, primitive Indian elite shouldn’t be allowed to squiggle in the cloak of some eastern mystic with unique elevated connection to truth, reality is much mucky.

Post script: After the blasts in Bangkok, one clever fellow was quick to hit the button. He lamented the fact that India is not leveraging its ‘historical cultural’ connections with East Asia. The blast happened near Hindu temple is what got him excited, it was pushed in that the temple brought in positive energy, predicted by astrologers, hence balance to calamitous world that only some have the tricks for quick fix solutions. It is clear that the bomb blasts didn’t fall into positive. So how are we going to cover that one, squatter embedded journalist should have the alibi. In the meanwhile in the midst of the unfolding tragedy he seemed offended that ‘brahmins’ are replaced by Buddhist monks in ‘saffron robes’, but is satisfied that atleast clandestinely Hindu ways are practised, having witnessed ‘brahmin decedents’ at work in the royal palace. Incidentally this fellow’s enthusiasms were not shared as he was corrected, ‘Indic influence’ as our man went gaga on Indian civilizational influence. Sane people don’t want to have any reference to Indian “civilizational” influence -the predominating narration being that of obnoxious squatter, this our man doesn’t really get. This scoundrel who is masquerading journalist needs to understand that opposite happened in India as Buddhist temples were grabbed by squatters and converted into spots of debauchery in the meanwhile the temples in East Asia incorporated the subtleties and refined ways, quite clearly squatters didn’t have any place in such narration. That is the difference between Hindu religion of East Asia and the subtle practises that evolved through Buddhism, and squatter controlled Indian Hindu temples that remain spaces of decadence and unethical ways that gets continuously replicated as it spreads into other fields and sustains. It is a mindset, hence attitude.  While they target Radhe maas of the world, the debauchery inside temples and how it corrupts souls is ignored. Not surprising, as this will expose lot of home truths and crude foundation of some ever purifying conscience keepers, including some accuracies on mahatmas and pundits.

It is also getting clear (atleast from this fellows claim) that ‘royal’ families in Thailand got their nourishment on elevated thyself from hobnobbing with squatters, if not now atleast few centuries back, –who are renowned for the ability to churn out creative otherworldly alibis to suit the occasion, hence the ‘royals’ in Thailand find themselves indispensably entitled. Monarchy is a disgraceful anachronism of modern times, a joke played on common people as also severe flaw in sensibilities of equitable dealing.                       

The Radhe maas of market media

There is nothing intriguing in the way market media chooses its target, like a pack of predators they ferociously attack and gleefully comment in an ever purifying and competing self-righteousness. Clearly the forces behind these theatrics are the same, they vary in the display and sensational intent, as also the sponsors (puerility of that in itself is another story). There is a woman who has become centre of fancy among the English and Hindi ‘news’ channel, now this one is some kind of comic relief therefore an easy target. The belligerence of the reporters and countering of the same create an absurd situation. She claims to be goddess (a goddess with a Punjabi accent is dream come true scene! Being an Indian can be sometimes be seriously funny affair) or atleast her followers believe so. Garishly dressed, gaudy surroundings, crudely materialistic concomitantly absence of application of mind or critical thinking is typical of most people in this part of the world, that has been suitably exploited for ages. Now this one is no saint or great soul that this society revere as the source of awareness in bleak world. There are so many like her who cleverly associate the nuances of squatter’s temples and showcase themselves as carriers of miracles. Not coincidentally this is what the squatters do in the temple too, creating wonders of gods and hawking the miracles, they also exaggerate human attributes of gods and in a clever sleight also to themselves for being the mediator. Now shift the framework to market media and service sector absurdities, what really has changed? Nothing much. The gods are now the specially created market icons, the actors and cricketers, both competing for varying degree of mediocrity. Indeed being an actor or cricketer is a minor matter, as they ferociously compete for endorsements (without ofcourse ever being responsible, and the onus is one use to be understanding towards them. Aw), and that defines their worth. These are the gaudy gods the market create and are carried from one product to another, from brand to another, dexterously parroting lines that seek to trap people. How is this different from the Radhe maas of the world? What is different from this fellow Shah Rukh khan pedaling cola and whatever, that market media depends on for its daily roti. Taking high moral grounds on slippery ethics is quite an art.

It needs also be noted that Market media in the avatar of saviour doesn’t really question the primitive foundations, indeed they quite gleefully promote it, as all kinds of charlatans, pandits (incidentally the abuse in Nehru Wikipedia entry is the word Pandit, and that should be investigated. Why Nehru is a pundit while others, some exceptionally erudite like Ambedkar, are not is a serious issue that will open up the Indian elite's depraved world), we are told bless their presence with absolute nonsense, they predict future, suggest puerilities as traditions so on, it’s an amazing racket. Of course some have morphed with bit of education into journalism, as political commentators prospecting Indian society while some does as 'consultants' on matters ranging from finance to anything under the sun. The crazy exaggeration of issue like Radhe maas of world are attempts by clever market operators trying to assert their moral superiority. Closer scrutiny shows they are as depraved and muck filled.      

The issues are chosen carefully by the market media as to how it can be exaggerated and squeezed, it is amazing how different media stampede from one issue to another in a tawdry replication of each other in intent and content indicating how they are controlled by similar source. This source, the cash rich byproduct of corporates, is the new benchmark. This cash rich specie that does the hawking, as the money pour in for the same, seems to be setting the agenda. A new low is created on every occasion. It is in this ecosystem likes of Trump are born and thrive, and as these get replicated in India as market spreads, one can be quite sure that there are hundreds and thousands of millionaires like him in here too are getting richer and richer. Indian elite is pupating in the same ecosystem, what differentiates them from likes of Trump is their dexterity of words and deep understanding of barbaric nonviolence, that make them look like angels. Negotiating entitlements through nepotism and crony capitalism, cunningness posited as higher conscience, liberalism pointers in semantic jugglery…these are only the tip of iceberg. You will encounter much depraved home truths as you go down. Consumerism is therefore the new great liberator, indeed with few well-placed shots even creates a sense of patriotism. They therefore degrade systems and institutions, quite an easy task in a society where rules are lax, traditions strong and culture ever superior. This megalomaniac specie has necessary attributes of squatter’s primitiveness and cunningness while carrying the finesse of western liberals, they land into juiciest of occasions for enhanced branding. How much they have encroached policy making institutions is the mute question. There is no question that they have severely intruded into public space, and has further pushed the society into thriving absurdity filled consumers.   

Now that an Indian is heading Google, the market was alert to dumb it down for the herd. “Bollywood and cricket” was sought to be rushed in as essential hinge of Indian identity. The market driven buffoonery was in full swing. Ofcourse now finally the mediocre IIT has found the traction, to justify their ordained selves and position that the world will have to deserve them (?!). Hence the section is furiously pushing in the mythical attributes of IITians which the world as also universe will have to but recognize one day. Reality check: IITians are mostly mediocre and amazingly insular, as much as engineering field is exaggerated, they are just fine tuning market requirements and filling in. The so called innovators are only working within the framework, mostly incremental opportunists. This blogger thinks that, with few rare exceptions, this is one of Indian myth making racket. I used to meet IITians quite often while I was moonwalking in JNU and around, except some rare occasions they are mostly blinkered and too focused in all its negative import. I rarely found them interesting. Few months back I was interacting/interviewing a boy from IIT Delhi, and thought he was quite a genius (knowing how this word is misused). He could read and write a language, any language, within few days, and could retain it forever. He knew more than 20 languages! So we asked him to write a random name (srinivasan) in Tamil and Malayalam. And he was able to, though ‘shree’ is second word you learn in Malayalam (hari shree ganapathaye namaha), it is quite tough to write. I thought he was brilliant and one rare human being. But the boy was extremely confused about what to do with himself, he doesn’t really fancy engineering, and was extremely short on self-confidence on the verge of breakdown. That is what this bullshit called IIT, fixation and exaggeration, the mediocre society has created. 

     

Commentators were also seen pushing Indian value system?! And what really is that?  A society with amazingly ambiguous moral bearings always looks forward to justify itself on flimsiest of occasions. These kinds of individual achievements when you compare with overwhelming regressive surrounding and primitive ways cannot be generalized as an attribute of a society. Indeed this blogger will posit that despite overwhelming odds that Indian society creates some people are still able to do well is indeed a stupendous achievement, and instead of self-congratulating (for god knows what reason), it is better to introspect as to why Indians are such mediocrity appreciating bunch with extreme rare attribute of subtlety. These achievements has more do with the framework, and individuals escaping it. And yes they do well if they have to work within the system, that favor sincerity and hardworking as main attributes. As one fellow said in BBC: this is nothing to do with region or race. Assuming that there is an Indian race, though there are many Indians who tend to believe themselves to be quite superior, the dexterity with words morphs them as liberal. 

This blogger is here to rip the mask, quite sure of that one. This is an arduous task as the entrenched deviance is strong, and they have strongly positioned themselves as the money, power, traditional structures and alliances consolidates. They created crude aspiration frameworks, that are the basis of mediocrities and miseries. They are adept in degrading people and elevating gods, ditto with market -degrading nature and undermining basic ethical values. They are the basis of crony capitalism and nepotism, and primitive worldviews that is transmitted to younger generations. Morphing liberal values may impress the world community but this blogger knows the home truth, and is here to expose it. In this context Gandhi is only one of the array of defense that the elite carry with so much relish. The unfortunate reality is whether right or left, or anyone in between, Indian elite is severely compromised lot, and the depravity is much ingrained as they are aware of it. And that they have spread thin across the spectrum is the curse on Indian society. 

The desperate branding of goodness

The Nestle (Maggi) issue was quite a revelation, as devious commentators brought in their compassion exuding versions to side with the defaulters. Market as harbinger of goodness is now an established fact among certain section but that the multibillion dollar rich corporates are epitomising conscience is something of a revelation. Political clout and money power is the constant crave hence the stable factor, how you negotiate these into positive frame is the narration here. Corporates wants to display themselves as good, hence in constant look out for goodness. The goodness is now cemented as liberal values, hence ferocious defence and stampede by the elites meanwhile exaggerating threat perceptions to maximise their advantage. Being a mediocre lot they have hinged themselves as service providers a compelling euphemism for sweet talking facilitators adept in range of manipulations. After liberalisation big money has been flowing to multiply itself, hence the touts have morphed into sophisticated versions. With this huge money they have been twisting and degrading the system with ease as compliant policy makers wait for their cut. Market media is very much in the game and have their own agents working furiously to gain clout. As they went on with their nefarious ways they needed cloak of goodness, that is why we have these soul mercenaries who moonwalk as opinion makers, slick communicators, do-gooders etc. morphing into the requirement for a price. They expertise in taking conscience to ridiculous level embellishing it with Indian culture and tradition (i.e. if they intend to give a right twist to the narration) or higher goals of humanity cleverly hinging it to western pointers of liberalism. Exploitative corporates need them as a front, market media has a high value on them, so do the political establishment depending upon twist that is needed.    

          

A cash rich specie has emerged, as an essential by-product of service industry gigantism, they fix things and provide twist to the narration as and when needed. They expertise in creating perceptions on demand, obfuscate ethics and push in subjectivity to rules. Even basic facts are sought to be dimmed, recently Coca Cola is reported to be pushing the nonsense that “to maintain a healthy weight, get more exercise and worry less about cutting calories”. “The beverage giant has teamed up with influential scientists who are advancing this message in medical journals, at conferences and through social media. To help the scientists get the word out, Coke has provided financial and logistical support to a new nonprofit organization called the Global Energy Balance Network, which promotes the argument that weight-conscious Americans are overly fixated on how much they eat and drink while not paying enough attention to exercise”. While Health experts say this message is misleading and part of an effort by Coke to deflect criticism about the role sugary drinks have played in the spread of obesity and Type 2 diabetes. They contend that the company is using the new group to convince the public that physical activity can offset a bad diet despite evidence that exercise has only minimal impact on weight compared with what people consume.

Coca cola can do this so easily in India. Confusion over ‘science of health’ is an easy matter to manipulate. You can use the service of array of soul mercenaries, as also specially ordered icons, journalists, politicians, marketeers (includes colossal waste nutcases who do IIM after IIT, ready for any money suck), creative sellers (some even get poetic)…everyone is available at the right price. This usual haggling or even show of minimal talent, in whatever field, is for enhancing their brand value. Nestle is a good corporate image, hence soul mercenaries have latched in, it is a symbiotic relation. It is also quite likely these corporates might have fed handsomely as service gigantism spread with liberal values cloak, nepotism fattened clique furiously clearing the path with higher and higher conscience in shifting moral grounds. The new government most likely played its trick, the Lead/MSG issue seems like a convenient alibi. I gather there are corporates that is taking sides (or have taken sides) or is trying to masquerade higher conscience. There is a wresting of initiatives going on, as the other sides are trying to push in the ‘ominous portent’ narration. It is in this wrestling that crumbs fall for common people, atleast now we have some standards on packaged food that will be checked. It is the same reason why the Congress government didn’t initiate any meaningful changes or reforms (despite some brilliant suggestion by subsequent reform commissions so on), there was no gain, they therefore maintained socio-political status quo as the cronies reaped in. Afterall in this society moral codes were sought to be established through Mahabharata, essentially a family feud exaggerated for grandeur; scheming, and cunning protagonists mostly devoid of ethics or compassion. In this family feud of elite we have to search our morals, it is the same framework that exists even today. The negotiators have shifted from primitive frameworks to board rooms. In this narration of one-upmanship crumbs are dropped to common people, that is democracy.

Donald Trump could very well be Donald Deshpande, a convenient Gandhian (if seeking to take higher moral grounds), or a high sounding bureaucrats (with negotiable ethics, but high on traditional pointers), pretentious journalist (dexterity with words, also exalting lifestyle puerilities), or a machiavellian marketer (on a liberal high ride, ever so landing softly as GDP trustees), investment friendly politician (ready to open up the natural resources to be plundered by likes of billionaire Trumps or Aggrawals), an activist socialite (market props who cover loose ends, purring sickularism/compassion, moral morphing whatever can fetch)…thankfully the new government is seeking to plug in the loopholes, although it is an arduous task, decades of apathy have severely dented the institutions. Knowing the primitive social system, entrenched apathy and contemporary realities this blogger is not expecting any miracles but is ready to give this government atleast a decade. Even some of the corruption charges can be excused, it is a minor matter at this stage (overwhelming perception is that Sushma Swaraj is not corrupt, she made the habitual mistake of Indian elite when they see money bags, but nothing substantial was compromised. IPL is a stink pot and everyone including the cricketers are corrupt and severely compromised). Compared to the kind of loot and arrogance initiated by the previous government these are nothing, and what makes it distressing is that they don’t seemed to have learned the lessons, many of the cunning leaders are still in currency and espousing high values. Amazing lack of leadership, one would have thought worst defeat would have revamped them, kicked out the dead weights, crafty weasels. Indeed that is what happens when you feed sycophants while arrogant leaders tend to be assured of their invincibility in these fawn filled surroundings.  

First ever ant website. Wonderful.

In my world ants have always had a very special place. Better part of my childhood was spent observing ants than anything else. I am also quite fascinated by myrmecomorphy, that is, the insects that mime ants, the most common being spiders and wasps. It is in this context I am glad to inform that a spellbinding website, world’s first ever ant map showing the distribution of ants around the globe, was launched yesterday by the University of Hong Kong. http://antmaps.org/. It is a colourful interactive online map which took four years to complete, and displays the geographic locations of nearly 15,000 types of ants. What more can one ask for?

Would you be calm and placid

If you were full of formic acid?

(Ogden Nash)

IUCN, WWF, CITES must answer

"Trophy hunting is a form of wildlife use that, when well-managed, may assist in furthering conservation objectives" (IUCN)

My respect for WWF is substantially diminished over the years, now the intent of CITES, as was elucidated by one of its spokesperson, has appalled me in no small measure. As one was trying to come in terms with serious ethical breaches and moral expediencies comes the revelation of IUCN. Are these people for conservation or is conservation a ruse for furthering themselves and their ways, animals as a convenient alibi to spread oneself. Animals cannot speak so you can be the spokesperson and manipulate (reminds me of cunning Indian elite who with effortless feudal ease seek to represent common people and rub it in through ever purifying moral matrix). 

It is becoming quite clear that the wildlife related conservation issues are still run by erstwhile hunters and colonisers. The kind of literature on hunting by colonisers will leave you baffled, the depravity of it beyond shock. Indeed if you visit Bharatpur bird sanctuary you will see a placard on the number of birds killed in one go, it crosses thousands. What kind of sick people will do these? These hunting zones were protected as they wanted the numbers to increase so that they can kill for their perverse pleasure. These regions later acquired the status of wildlife sanctuaries, so conservation wasn’t the early concern. During these massacres of animals for pleasure common people’s knowledge were used for tracking, while Indian elite were enthusiastic participants of massacre creating their own records to match the masters. In the weekends they cemented further as they fawned over master’s gentlemanly attributes through cricket (like squatter’s temples cricket was also quite successfully pushed through the throats of common people, with immense success and relish. Cursory study will show how mediocrity thrived as it sucked on), they also got essential lessons on modernity that they easily blended into feudal norms and sickening traditions.

It is in this context I find the ease to analyse WWF, CITES, IUCN so on (I must again express my gratefulness to Indian elite and their depraved ways). Clearly the erstwhile hunters and decadent colonisers have occupied responsible positions in the wildlife conservation related organisations. They might have morphed themselves successfully as conservators but their intent will show in the crucial situations. ‘Trophy hunting’ is such an occasion where they open up as practical souls with higher intent in mind.  The kind of conservation strategy that they pursue quite clearly carries the legacy of brutes and colonisers. Selective killing maybe used as a last resort to balance or to weed out, in rare instances, but trophy hunting is a different matter. It seeks to encourage sick minds and their debauched ways, it is awfully disturbing. Even the monetary gains and ‘economic incentives’, that seeks to exploit the poverty in an exceedingly classist framework, doesn’t stand scrutiny. A study shows that 70.4 percent of Americans would pay to view lions on an African safari, while only 6.6 percent would pay to hunt them.

The people who are holding responsible positions in WWF, IUCN, CITES etc. must be scrutinised closely, the erstwhile scums seems to have morphed as conservators. Ironically people who are connected to forest and its ways generally tend to be sustainable in the practice and compassionate in their outlook. They rarely kill for fun, sick thrills nor will support depraved minds, their poverty (which ofcourse is the result of skewed nature of socio-economic system, than any claim to competence. Donald trump is a sterling example) is being exploited for furthering one’s debauched ways.

The picture herein is that Donald trump’s son. A CNN newsreader, an Afro-American trying to balance the discussion, was saying in defence of Trump “...but his children are normal and not in wrong ways”. Being normal is such a big deal, even in this limited ethical space look what is there to see. Sickening.   

The Ted Turner way

To be very frank I didn’t know much about Ted Turner, just a vague idea of him being a ‘media mogul’ so on. The other day I was watching CNN and saw this interview (Amanpour.) that got me riveted. What an amazing man. Apart from brilliance and quaint quintessential American way, that is almost extinct, he is precise and alert to the point with sharp memory. Some people attract you instantly. When asked about Bill Gate’s investment in fossil fuel, he didn’t go haranguing of any sort, on the contrary, he just said ‘he is smart’. Sarcasm at its best. What I also liked is this concept of buying land and let it be the way it is, with free horses and wild bisons, quite a sight that one.

I have seen palatial houses that doesn’t even leave an inch of ‘waste space’ no gardens no nothing just concrete. It is therefore a refreshing idea to buy land and create forest or just leave it the way it is. I recall few years back while I was cycling through Kerala meeting a man who created a forest on his private property. The task of conservation should include more people, private sanctuaries should be allowed ofcourse under strict wildlife laws and precautions. It is time to introduce private/public participation into wildlife sanctuaries. I have sponsored animals in the zoo, but if there is an option of sponsoring wild animals in their habitat I will prefer that.   

Justice delayed is justice denied: The tragic nature of carbon units

It is inhuman to keep a person on death row for more than two decades then execute him. In a civilised world any sane person should be against capital punishment, it is barbaric and questions the mode of State’s response.  This blogger has read and understood the arguments regarding capital punishment, as also some really riveting fiction works from Camus to Dostoevsky. Camus has been my favourite and I am quite influenced by his views. Therefore few years back I too had reservations on capital punishments but now realise that the issue is complex when it comes to Indian situations, one cannot be quite certain. It is contextual and needs to be applied as the situation demands, in the rarest circumstances. Human life is not sacrosanct, to argue that human life predominates everything else is placing it in ethical moral context created by religion. That is not how nature works, and human being is only minor but increasingly dominant part of narration called life. If one human being decides to take another human being's life or a set of people’s life then if investigation finds factors pointing to heinousness of the intent, as also other aggravating factors then that person very definitely loses his case on his own life. Clearly these are not confined to direct act of killing only but also to creating circumstances that degrades lives of community and causes deaths, hence needed be treated with equal seriousness. So the question of degrading the environment, ecosystem and thus putting lives of millions of humans and other species at risk is a serious matter. Psychopath capitalists rarely face death sentence, even the worst of offenders like Anderson are escorted out.

You have to live your life responsibly; if it grievously intrudes into others then you have to take the consequences. It may sound retributive hence uncivilized but then that is what punishment is defined as, there is inbuilt vengeance in the concept of punishment. If a person takes the life of another person, in a situation that points to heinousness, then that person will have to be punished in the severest form possible. Now whether that is to be capital punishment or life imprisonment is the question. Why this blogger favours capital punishment in such situation is based on realistic factors that are based on the tribulations facing this society, hence we cannot be compared with Europe or richer societies. India is a poor country where millions of people live under abject poverty and desperation; people die of malnutrition and diseases. They don’t get the attentions that is expected from the State, further the society is too skewed that makes the elite section extremely exploitative. In such situation the argument that perpetrators of heinous crime can have the option of comfortable stay and regular food is not acceptable. Why I use the term ‘comfortable’ is since if you compare the abject destitution under which millions of poor people exist then any concrete structure over head is undoubtedly comfort if not luxury, and to have access to regular food without any uncertainties is a dream for many therefore when these facilities are extended to perpetrators of heinous crimes, in the name of life imprisonment, it becomes a joke on lives of poor people in this country. Food and shelter is what millions of people don’t have (in cities there are many instances of them being crushed by vehicles as they sleep on footpath), and they are not violent and don’t kill other people. In most cases they are vicious outcome of skewed social circumstances and lack of enlightened policy making, therefore the state’s limited resources must go to these areas. Further, there are too many people, and the population keeps on increasing, under such circumstances heinous criminals cannot be guaranteed life. Keeping the carbon unit that is serious threat to society, having committed act of heinousness, is a waste and must be terminated. This might sound robotic but if you place yourself in abject poverty and crowded surroundings then you have to be practical. We are exploding quite rapidly, food is becoming costly, space for healthy living is reducing at a faster rate, surroundings are degrading and unsustainable. Freedom is only a notion for most people; they are trapped in the demeaning frameworks and primitive worldviews. It is worse than being imprisoned in a jail. Capital punishment therefore isn’t a bad option at all. It may or may not have deterrence but that is a minor issue.     

          

  We have to also factor in machiavellian elite who masquerade benevolence as they take sides depending on gains or high moral grounds that fetch precious price in West. They don’t live in congested places and diminished facilities, they don’t face daily abuses and threats. Indeed it can be argued quite easily that they themselves are in many way cause of these disparities that undoubtedly has historical reasons and contemporary apathy.  It is quite clear that Indian elite see these occasions to establish their ideas of compassion hence compassionate, in the meanwhile they quite firmly play to the international community as representing higher moral for Indians hence could be fed. It is held that capital punishment is barbaric and that many civilised countries have discontinued it. It is ironic but Indians cannot claim to be civilised, therefore you cannot create a superstructure of trying to be civilised while ensconced in primitive. This call for compassion and stampeding onto attention seeking issues is a clever ploy and opportunism. India has one of the tardiest judicial systems, common people languish in jails for years and years as under trials for pettiest of crimes (recently there have been attempts to mitigate these), and that is worse than capital punishment, these are living dead and that too people who maybe innocent. While there are successful lawyers and legal luminaries who walk on planet earth with faintest of bearings. What can be more brutal than this? Cases take years and years while the judiciary fattens on these miseries. The law and systems herein are archaic, many times continuing the colonial legacy. Life in this part of the world is much cheaper, this chest beating over capital punishment therefore smacks of same insensitivities as also moral arrogance that is so characteristic of Indian elite. If Indians have same living conditions and standards’ as Europeans and enjoy same alert law and machinery as also judiciary then we can debate on morality over perpetrators of heinous crimes. If Indian elite are as enlightened as any member of civilised society then they can take high moral grounds. In this skewed society with depraved traditions, very much tethered to primitive, they will not be allowed to take it to the next level. They will be reminded of home truths, it cannot be wished away nor will it be allowed to be cloaked in clever words. Actually Indian elite have much in common with market driven crude mainstream in USA –very much in consonance with white supremacist, both strangely skewed societies with high estimation about itself and considers oneself infallible, ordained by god’s special acts. Americans are violently moral, while Indians non-violently moral. Both lethal in their morality, and uses it in every opportune occasion to obfuscate the truth. One uses guns as weapon other uses clever words and depraved ways for spreading untold misery. One kills physically while the other kills the soul and degrades the humans. They both pride in democracies but end up ridiculous caricatures. It need be pointed out that a better part of USA is quite sane and vibrant hence the progress, that cannot be said about Indians who have the habit of living on others, hence static and perpetrators of heinous ways. Taking high moral grounds in vacuum that resembles Europe or other enlightened societies doesn’t work; the social circumstances and realities have to be factored in. It is a habit of Indian elite to take high moral grounds from most unethical and inhuman surroundings, it is their wont to use high flying words that carry no much meaning or intent, they satisfy their audience, grab and move on. It is the common people who have to face the realities and consequences. The tardy law and order machinery, a judiciary that perpetuates its own absurdities, political elite that preserves itself on pointers of feudalism, while the religious elites/priests arguably the worst scums on earth, and now we have to go through the deceit of bleeding heart primitives strategically placed around gravy pits as they negotiate nuances of pride, preference and prejudice. Afro-American community must ask this question to themselves: is it pride, or is it preference or is it prejudice that kills them?…to understand it they need to negotiate through vaginal superhighways and get into the mind of Indian elite, a wonderful world of depravity. 

If justice is delayed then it is justice denied. The judges must be held responsible, this blogger believes that Yakub Memon’s case was quite brutally handled since you cannot keep a person on death row for so many years, it is unethical. As also too much resources and money are being wasted. These cases should be finished within five years, or the person should be left free for the reason of incompetence of judiciary.  In the meanwhile a judge must be immune to political pressures and influences, as also be aware of social circumstances and inequities. It is clear that some death sentences are commuted to life imprisonment due to political reasons. The perpetrators of heinous acts like assassination of former PM should have been dealt long time back, they do fall into rarest of rare case so do the Delhi bus gang rapists. There are hundreds and thousands of farmers who are killing themselves. These are peace loving people, ordinary people, trapped in a system that doesn’t seem to be in their control, and are forced to take their own life. Isn’t society responsible for their deaths? There are millions of people dying and suffering because of lack of proper food, unhygienic surroundings and common diseases and infections that could be easily be cured. When you keep perpetrators of heinous crime under life imprisonment you are extending these facilities that are being denied to millions of marginalised common people, and that is immoral. Death sentences can only be discontinued as and when the society is egalitarian. The understanding of egalitarianism must start from how we treat common people and our surrounding, as also home truths.  The concept of egalitarianism shouldn’t be kept at the fancy of elite section, and debating club herein, those looking for traction and gaining points at international level. Resource stretched India as also world community is facing threats in terms of terrorism and complexities that arises herein, these need to be dealt accordingly. As is the case death sentences are used in rarest of rare cases in India unlike China or USA, and a more sensitive President would deny it further, hence capital punishment could be used judiciously as and when the need arises. 

An adorable man

Abdul Kalam was referred to as people’s president for more than many reasons. He had an infectiously positive presence; the sincerity of purpose is what stood out. A dedicated and energetic enthusiasm to know and understand, and translate that to younger generation in a simple lucid manner made him sought after person. A top class scientist, committed to the cause of the nation, a communicator and a benevolent guru. And what is amazing is that he achieved these high technical and scientific calibres without going abroad for higher studies, so on.

It is surprising that he could go through the scheming, mediocre system and come out intact. For that we have to express our gratitude to two individuals, both remarkable in their own way. One, Vikram Sarabhai, who recognised his calibre at an early and crucial stage, probably that saw him bypass the self defeating rigmarole and deceitful surroundings that plagues Indians. That provided him with essential space to sparkle, to be the topmost Indian scientist, and a charming individual. Second, ofcourse is another of great leader Atal Bihari Vajapai, the former PM, who suggested him for the President’s position. So as we pay tribute to Mr. Kalam, as an inspiring human being and undoubtedly a gift to the nation, we must also recognise the role of these two exceptional leaders, one in the field of Science another in Politics. I am reiterating this since all these decades we have leaders imposed on us, depending on their qualities of malleability and sycophancy. Think of Presidents like Giani Zail Singh or Fakkruddin Ali Ahmed, I can go on with the list of those who occupy responsible positions apart from the role as President, those who degrade the institutions, indeed threat to democracy itself (Pranabji is being watched quite closely, so far he is falling regrettably short). We can only blame people who perpetuate these.  

At a personal level, I happen to see Mr. Kalam once at the crossing near India gate more than a decade back, indeed I could have moved on but I waited since I wanted to have a glimpse of him. The other day I was in same position vis-à-vis Pranabji, and I said to myself ‘O dear’ and moved on. This fellow could have spent some time with school children or indeed at the zoo (undoubtedly one of the most well maintained zoo in the country), these will not occur to him and I am not surprised at all. I sometimes take HR related sessions, and Abdul Kalam is always an easy reference that connects with the younger generations. Many years back I even visited Mr. Kalam’s home in Rameshwaram as also lodge in Thiruvanathapuram, and wrote about it in my blog. Earlier last year I had plans to cycle from Puducherry to Tutikudi, and had included Rameshwaram in the itinerary. I still have that tour plan, maybe later this year I will take it up, and include Rameshwaram as a tribute to Mr. Kalam. 

The Jawa days of Mysuru

Some are quite connected to vehicles, there was once a bike known as Jawa. If you recall Yezdi, quite a popular bike in 1980s, well these were manufactured in Mysuru and exported too, now ofcourse the unit is closed and there are apartment buildings, the bus stop is still Jawa. Jawa craze is still around and every second Sunday of July they get together. Quite coincidently I spotted them on my morning cycling. I must add the vehicle is quite polluting. Craziness and nostalgia for the bikes withstanding, if they don’t follow the pollution rules, then should be fined.

Motor racing is big money initiated and sponsored event that the market media is duty bound to follow and report. Then there are compelling visuals of accidents that are another source of money spinning enterprise. As for Indian media this is how they claw themselves into world standard reporting. Pretentious Indians too are warming up to these ‘sports’, one mediocre fellow even manage to snatch an Arjuna award, the depravity of it. Another instance of how they manipulate and degrade awards. In the meanwhile people die too. Recently two british car racing enthusiasts fell straight into a deep gorge. They are investigating what went wrong; yep they must find out, it surely is a mystery. Why do normal people drive fast as they negotiate dangerous roads, indeed why should they be allowed to? And yes why do fast driven cars veer off the road? It is not supposed to, is it? The family and friend, meanwhile, insist on them being charming individuals. They seem to be, one of the fellow even wore a rabbit toy cap as he drove and pranked his own absurdity moments before he was consumed.

President is in town: if temple hopping was a sport (which it should be) then President Pranab should win it hands down, ostensibly he is in town to celebrate anniversary of education institution but our man is such an incorrigible hopper. As mentioned in my earlier blog this is how the power structure gives credibility to primitive, and this percolates down as social mobility frame and aspiration. This is how things are working out in this godforsaken society in the last many centuries. And then the world asks why Indians are such incompetent people? Essentially the question is for the elite since they are the one who have manipulated to the power and seek to represent Indians, indeed some even attained mahatmahood in the process.  Common people are much realistic and smarter but they are subjugated by these clever narrations and pitfalls, hence pushed down. Pranab quite easily ensconces into presidential trapping, that carefully emulates the british monarchy and feudal markers as tradition. It is also not surprising that, even inside the ‘Presidential palace’ the people who are selected to work are to follow certain criteria. And this was reported by Kasturi slave, the fellow from JNU reports that you have to be tall (okay acceptable) and belong to certain caste configuration (?!!). Shocking. This scoundrel from JNU (this blogger feels that JNU too needs FTII treatment, these pretentious primitive caretakers should be taken to task) expresses these as matter of fact. Over the years all the Presidents and minions (the so called leaders) have adhered to these legacies put in by our wonderful freedom fighters.

Rivers were source of reverence as representation of natural forces, the providers of life. These subtle ways were usurped as squatters pushed in their framework of clever ways and rituals to propitiate during auspicious time, hence blessings. Quite a money spinner that one, as also consolidated their position as mediators. They trapped common people in these vicious grip as traditions. To make the matter worse they, as is their character, sided with the rich and powerful, hence as common people rushed in to get blessing at appropriate time, meaning god is open for business, hence auspicious, powerful people were given precedence. As common people are pushed out to give way to the powerful there is a stampede, many die. A common phenomenon around here, an amalgamation of deceitful ways, the fight for opportune blessings, the cunningness of the mediators and the brazenness of powerful.

Pranab (as a President he is also referred to as Mahamuhim? Really, somebody please explain, when do we stop these fuedal references?) was recently seen at Tirupathi, that he got precedence over common people, and that he also posed for his cameraman, along with his son tells the same story of depravity. Did he find out who are the people who are masquerading as priests and what is their credential? Indeed every temple occupied by squatters is a site akin to Auschwitz, and that is mild comparison. Elites represented by likes of Pranab, who are working on their nicer ways as also secularism, need to be pointed out that on the contrary these are not, and that they are as primitive. He needs to civilize himself, these pretensions don’t help and will not work. And yes, welcome to Mysore Mr. President, I read that whole of Chamundi temple hill area has been cordoned off for thy celestial communion with the divine. I will be cycling towards race course around noon, please don’t cross my path.   

Deconstructing secularism, the people living beyond the river Indus

Secularism is the most misused term in this part of the world, there is an attempt made to take the definitions and understandings of the western societies and somehow coalesce it into Indian reality. This superimposition goes well with the elitist notions and requirements. It’s a Faustian deal by the Indian elite –masquerading liberal, that this society suffers, as primitive identities are sought to be hidden in cloak of civilised. The West gawking elite have tutored themselves the values of modernity and notions of democracy. This fake sophistication as identity is sought to be further chiselled and practised in the form of their visceral dislike for brethren, the erstwhile collaborators of brutal atrocities. This opposing, the conflict, acts as a means to consolidate position, posited as beacon of values, thus copyright over idioms of culture and egalitarianism that is packaged herein is the easiest route chosen to connect to the vagaries of modernity, with immense success. It keeps primitive frameworks intact, feudalistic norms static and exploitative minds in constant hunt for greener pastures that could be cleverly morphed as modern. The grip over narration has created these debased anachronism to persist as culture as traditions. Hence they position themselves as compassionate souls concerned about the wellbeing of the society. Nothing could be farthest from the truth, and there is no irony in this audacity that comes with the feudal ease of being tethered to the brutal framework, that has degraded the society and continues to cause untold miseries. 

Hinduism is not a religion as is understood from the western framework, it doesn’t fall into definitions that has origin in Semitic religion. Indeed under such framework it cannot even be classified as a religion. It is not an irony that even the reference of the word Hinduism has alien origin and was meant to describe people living in certain geographical region, i.e. beyond the river Sindhu (or Indus). The ‘believers’ carrying the burden of semitic worldview when came in contact with this part of the world, were most likely bewildered by the way of life here, and had to assign some meaning. The reference was to a set of people, and began as a secular allusion devoid of religion but that didn’t stick for long. They had to ascribe based on the faith, any other understanding of a society and people was beyond their understanding, hence Hindus. A set of people with myriad number of gods/goddesses –that could be living or dead, animals, trees or stones, thoughts, counter thoughts and what not. Amazingly fertile and crazily polytheist, with no specific references of single holy text or scripture that can take primacy over different views. Nor was there any god that is supreme, that guides all values, morals so on. Indeed god was just a convenience to suit the occasion. They found solace in amalgamation of enlightened saints, stories, myths, hearsay and superstitions, that sought to consolidate the moral fibres in the meanwhile kept them connected to the natural forces. The forces of Nature were ready reference for superior forces hence respect, hence reverence and fear, therefore god. For people of this region everything had the potential of greatness, that which glimpsed the superior power of nature was worthy of reverence, hence god. This god wasn’t something beyond but part of everyday reference, so shouldn’t be mistaken for god as understood by semitic faiths. It needed no miracles or special messages. The understanding of god and expression of faith is entirely different.

Since Hindu religion in itself is in different premise it is but natural that the ideas of secularism, essentially tolerance or acceptance of different versions of faith, will be quite different from what is understood by the West through the influence of Christianity or other semitic ways that forms the basis of liberal values and democracy herein. To understand that we need to look much deeper into the process of Hinduism. If you were placed in Indian subcontinent about two thousand years back or more you wouldn’t even know that the ideas of faith you carry will soon be referred to as Hinduism. In the myriad ways of life that accommodated different views and thoughts something sinister was taking its roots. The power structures were being consolidated, rituals were being refined for manipulation. Places of worships were being sanitised and taken away from the sites of common people. You can see that even now: A huge tree that is rallying point of villagers very soon acquires a shed, later a structure, then the tree vanishes and you have a temple. Hence the connection with nature is removed and becomes a scene for greed, egos and petty politics. As these aligned with rulers and created a self-servicing system they spread with the reach of state machinery. The primitive system as it percolated brought in savages among ordinary well meaning people while the elite negotiated these by being the arbitrators of this cannibalism. It was the worst known system of society in human history. This then the motif of how common people’s understanding of faith was slowly gobbled by bigger and powerful mechanism. Myths were reworked to include bigger gods, as the local faiths and gods were sought to be subjugated and streamlined into mainstream narrations. In the meanwhile the depraved elite further sought to consolidate their gain by hereditary perpetuations of their deviant views. Toxic ideas rapidly infected what was once coalescing of people to deal with their own god in their own way. Poisonous thoughts consolidated in the forms of caste, egalitarian values were now modified to fit in this addition, and very cunningly ideas of faith were being consolidated for perpetuating a sickness that slowly pushed this society into degradation. What was once exalted thoughts of sages were now being accumulated by squatters to fit in their devious ways. As the structures consolidated, rituals started to gain primacy as it perpetuated a system of control and power. It turned cannibalistic and as absurd. More crudeness were included as they got pointers from semitic exposure; that even now seeks to define the Hindu fundamentalists, this search for fundamentals to cling on, an enthusiasm for monotheistic streamlining, search for definitive scripture and intolerance. Bhagvad Gita is only one of the texts but was shown as superior in response to semitic challenges, the elite was choosing pointers to fill in the gaps that semitic posited. Hence the constructed core was now established as religion ie Hinduism, and quite viciously occupied by crude people (squatters) with firm grip on narration henceforth. They created a religion hence eased as the arbitrators and controllers of common people who were now Hindus (it’s the same audacity Gandhi showed in Poona). Exalted selves, specially blessed from above, the exaggeration that seeks to differentiate, classify and degrade humans. It is also becoming increasingly clear that ideas of monotheism has had a deleterious effect on human society in the long run, it has trampled varied understandings and thoughts on faith, and beautiful expressions and cultures herein. It is a source of easy control over lives and squats potential to be different and meaningful.  

As Hinduism was being consolidated into power structures by depraved vested interests, grand philosophies were being eloquently proposed that sought to take the experience away from the common people. Faith was being ripped away from the premise of common people and closeted in elevated pedestals. The decadence was couched in languages and nuances that perpetuated amazing level of cruelty. The elite was slowly cocooning itself into spiteful crafty ways that could even baffle modern day psychiatrists, meanwhile the society slipped into incredible levels of mediocrity, indeed temples became site of debauchery. They hobnobbed with power, and included divine blessings in their repertory. Kings and sundry queued up for blessings. Gods started to acquire characteristics of crudeness, devious ways were now divinely attributes, hence squatters opened the field for myths that perpetuated heaven in their own justification. The appalling nature, indeed unethical in most cases, of divinely figures will deeply disturb any sane person. Therefore now in a clever sleight God was perpetuating squatter’s worldview. Deceitful acts were sought to be put in broader perspective of goodness in clever interpretations that became mainstay of squatter’s storytelling and myth building. In the process ethics was kept ambiguous and hinged on context, thus easily manipulatable entity. This therefore acquired the core of Hinduism, hence a way of life among the elites. Now compare the Hindu mythology, the stories herein, deceitful ways of even gods that will leave you appalled, and the charming stories of Jataka. The Buddhism exhibited its compassion by using animals and nature as tellers and consolidators of morals. I need to point here that the much quoted king Ashoka –as torchbearer of secularism, is flawed, it wasn’t secularism it was compassion. Some vested interests have created a narration of Ashoka to work out their narrow end. Compassion is a way of life in an enlightened surrounding, hence respect for myriad ways, it is not to be mistaken for a structure that sought to oversee other faiths, hence secularism. This compassion is where values that defined morals, hence secularism, emerged. Ashoka is not and cannot be a secular icon, for the simple reason secularism has no meaning without compassion, and secondly, pushing the western framework to find one’s traction among civilised will be resisted. Those tethered to primitive framework with burden of mahatmas on their back shouldn’t be allowed to usurp these legacies.        

It need be noted that all the while enlightened saints and sages, as also common people protested against this decadence and depraved ways that was being consolidated as Hinduism. And one can assert that all the egalitarian thoughts and values can be traced to this tradition of protest and enlightenment herein that existed much before the squatters (or even the temples) and has carried on guiding common people through the ages. This is space for compassion and benevolence. This is the tradition of tolerance that has come to be defined as secularism as people know and have ingrained as a way of life. This is what binds the society. It was not complementing squatter’s world, it was defending and resisting this negative pull. In the meanwhile in these protests sects were created, some even acquired status of religions. Common people associated with these without any thought of otherness or superiority.  It is the same way they negotiated semitic religions, although the terms of reference of these were harsh, but they amalgamated it well. Some even converted but carried these characteristics of leniency in matter of faith, a space untouched by competing forces. The degree of fracture is what separates Bangladesh from Pakistan, and prevents radicalisation instigated by crude semitism. It need be pointed out that common people constantly sought to resist the attempts by ritual driven squatters as they were exploited. But were increasingly sucked in and trapped into the crude squatter’s framework, as it dealt with tribulation of life, matters of death so on, they capitulated. Squatters grip was tight, with acknowledgement and patronage of rulers they gained credibility and prospered as temples became pits of depravity. In the feudal nature of the society these were grievous, as exploitations reached heinous level.   

Saints and egalitarian souls were not in a complementary role to squatters, indeed it was very definitively a role that was antagonistic. It was a strident opposition to squatter’s depravity and the crude world they pursued. They sided with the truth and ethical values, that were vacated from religious precincts. They brought in sanity into the society that was being cannibalised. In the meanwhile the debauched squatters dealt these with characteristic ease, instead of comforting the gravity of issue, they obfuscated the matter by questioning the credentials of the accusers, and went on constructing the most inhuman sort of worldviews. Credentials here meant the identity, the status in pecking order, the degree of ordain. This is so ingrained that this is now replicated as Indians appetite for status and position. It is not what you do that is important but what is your position, the ego and sensitivities around it defines the everyday work scenarios, whatever maybe one’s professional competence. It is not what is said but who is saying? Since it is not what you do but the position you hold there is a stampede for fancier meaningless designations. Unfortunately they fail to distinguish between identity and reference. As they are not able to shirk their entitled world hence mistake position for identity and bring in squatter’s deviant pattern and debauched value system. Their main aim being to consolidate the position and accrue benefits. It is this constant strive that defines jobs and aspirations. Qualifications can be acquired by mugging up or even be bought but attitude cannot be. The despicable attitude that emerges severely handicapped from the squatter's framework, it is shocking that it is being connected to god. Such unenlightened self-assured people. The arrogance and pretension of high culture in savage surroundings is what gets me.  

Hinduism therefore shouldn’t be taken in context to other religion. What is being defined as Hinduism is the degenerated part that is consolidated through feudal power and elaborate structure of control through cash rich temples and compelling narrations. Traditions herein are expressions of decadence and unfortunate prominence of these due to firm grip on narration that they manipulated at their will. People tethered with these are part of debauchery. Now we see them espousing values and in the name of western framework of secularism they seek credibility. ‘We must respect religion’ is being posited as egalitarian value hence secularism. Hinduism is not a religion nor what we see are expressions of Hinduism, these are coalesce of inhuman crudity that seeks credibility through modern nuances and power structures. Ironically what is being pushed as secularism, from the evolutionary aspect of ideas of Hinduism –hence the idea of India to a larger extend, isn’t even considered secularism at all. Anything that emerges from squatter’s framework is being rejected in this tradition that is foundation of this society. Indian secularism establishes and flourishes in rejecting squatter (i.e. caste cannibal) traditions; it was and is inimical to these expressions. Secularism in Indian context emerges from the expression of compassion; it was not about state versus religion paradigm. Indeed it is so secular that it doesn’t even recognise religion nor distinguish gods. The way Hinduism finds its expression and has consolidated now under the tutelage of power is the puss that is collected over the centuries from the gangrene of this society, the places of worship hence temples are putrid pits and people safeguarding these or tethered to these in anyway are dangerously decadent. It is no surprise that these decadents when they espouse secularism it makes us puke. And that they invariably come out as arrogant, cunning and corrupt. So by adhering to western understanding of secularism they shrewdly classify Hinduism as religion for their own benefits, while seeking credibility for their primitive conceptions. In the meanwhile, in the tradition of Indian compassion and tolerance, people kept away from these deceits, they bow to whatever god and move on. There is nothing to theorise or pontificate, nor do they have tricks to save the world. If a stone serves purpose, god so be it! The tradition of Jejuri is what defines it, Kolatkar caught it so well (unfortunately on my recent visit I see signs of squatters moving in, slow but relentless push of the power structure and exploitative mechanisms, now being replaced by market). In the best of bhakti tradition that defines this society, and is indeed core of Hinduism or whatever one may refer it, away from squatters and temples, they sing, dance, drop some food for the animals and move on.  I guess that does really explains it.